Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately there are very few people around with the time/money to buy both and test them back to back on the same car and dyno. Until there is I guess we'll never know. I've seen both up close off a car before and they're very schmick. I'm curious of the effects the 6boost oval entry into the turbo flange has on a dyno chart. Apparently it increases exhaust speed giving better response but you'd expect it to lessen the flow in the top end?

Now your making me want to sell my 8374. Any chance of seeing a dyno sheet from it? I know the numbers are probably top secret but even if you got rid of the numbers so we could get an idea of the curve.

yep there will be graphs I'm sure. we have agreed to provide the graphs to Borg Warner and Full Race and I'm sure they will want to share them. I don't know if the scale will be intact but I don't see why not. A certain power figure at just 1 point in time one 1 dyno doesn't really give the game away....

Sounds awesome so far- not sure if you are joking about needing a bigger turbo though haha. Have you already maxed it out, and thats the motivation for saying that - or is it just because it spools better than you anticipated so figure a bit more lag for a bit more power would be acceptable?

This turbo is advertised as being able to ~95lb/min of air - if thats accurate, this has the potential to be a 1000hp vehicle... call me conservative, but that might be just about enough for a track car ;)

yes serious about considering a bigger turbo. but we are not nearly finished with this one yet. like TheKeeper said we have not really stretched the legs on this one yet and the thought was pretty much like you said. it's response was so much better than expected that we'd be willing to sacrifice some of that for even more top end. but we'll have to see how much top end it has yet... if it makes a power number that is in kw at the wheels and starts with a 6 then we'll probably be satisfied.

the biggest thing the 9180 response has done for me is make me even more excited about the twin 6258s. they sit between a single 8374 and a 9180 in terms of flow (88lb/min combined). my thinking now is they'll probably be at least as responsive as -5s (maybe even -7s/GTSS?) and should outperform -10s up top. to early to stake my life on such predictions yet but it no longer seems impossible.

Yeah I don't have anything really bad to say about 6boost manifolds. they are a great product. I have recommended them to friends of mine as far back as 5 years ago (or more). I can't say I've tested the same turbo back to back on the same car with a full race vs a 6boost. maybe one day. but I have looked carefully at both. They are both great products but I personally feel the full race is a little more advanced. they are so nicely finished too.

No doubt some of the excellent spool and power you are getting with your turbo combo will have to be attributed to the manifolds, etc. The final product is effectively the sum of the parts used, it may not give the same result with an RPS Exhaust, XS Power exhaust manifold, reground cams and an old Microtech.

well anyone who reckoned the 9180 might be too big was way off...it's way more responsive than the -10s it replaced. getting the car set-up on the dyno at part throttle the thing is coming onto boost in the 3,000-4,000rpm range! my memory is hazy so don't quote me but off the top of my head at 4,000rpm it made 60kw more than the -10s

promising start - we think once you get more time with this turbokit the last thing youll worry about is pulling it off for another :thumbsup:

Great news Richard. We knew you'd like the performance. We've seen in person that it's not hype, but ultimately want the guys in the trenches to show the rest of the community just how impressive these turbos are...thanks for the props, we do our best to make a product you'll never have to replace.

^^^^^ +1

the biggest thing the 9180 response has done for me is make me even more excited about the twin 6258s. they sit between a single 8374 and a 9180 in terms of flow (88lb/min combined). my thinking now is they'll probably be at least as responsive as -5s (maybe even -7s/GTSS?) and should outperform -10s up top.

agreed - after we finished the twin turbo EFR6258 skyline in the US i started to reconsider my personal cars' turbo setup. My car is LHD so its much more difficult to fit the twins, however I consider the boost response and linearity of the twin 6258 powerband as phenomenal, so I am particularly eager to hear your impressions compared to all the twins youve run over the years. we have a steady supply of the smaller EFR's from borg warner so if i went twins i could potentially put my car back together quickly...

seriously though, don't comment too much on Full race gear till you've seen it in the flesh. it's hard to capture properly in pics just how nice it is.

thanks for the vote of confidence, that means a lot coming from a seasoned pro such as yourself. Everyone on our team at Full-Race works *hard* to put out a top-shelf product .. anybody that claims to top us in quality or design better have their act together because we do and its not easy!

I would suggest something around 280 10.5mm if it's a track car. the thing is lots of the jap cams are a bit too big on duration and too small on lift to enable them to be bolt in cams.

totally agree with you - 280 x 10.5 or 280 x 11.5 is a great cam. I personally prefer to have solid boost response by ~3500-3700rpm so for my driving style and 2.6L displacement the 8374 is preferred. For anyone with an Rb30 and an aggressive trans like you guys have the 9180 is clearly the monster.

going by the results I've heard of the 67mm S400SX turbos doing - the compressor wheel is probably capable of pretty serious things, all comes down to how much exhaust gas the 80mm turbine can do. I'm picking that if the cam specs thrown around are at all relevant to this setup, its capable of quite happily cracking 600kw on a hubdyno running E85.

we recently tested a 1.9L honda on the BW S400SX 67mm, which as you mention uses a similar design compressor wheel to the EFR 9180 but with the 83mm inconel turbine wheel for max exhaust flow and power, designed primarily as a drag racing 67mm not so much focused on spoolup/response. on a 1.9L honda engine, 31psi boost and E85 race fuel we saw 950hp on a dynapack hubdyno. does not spool nearly as well as the efr of course

not a chance.

:cheers:

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible. nicely built RB30/26, ARC intercooler, hypertune plenum, full race manifold, twin turbo-smart gates, EFR 9180, beautifully made piping, hollinger, dry sump, autronic ecu and CDI etc etc. so if ever a 9180 is going to be pushed it will be on a car like this.

we have very high hopes. :)

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible. nicely built RB30/26, ARC intercooler, hypertune plenum, full race manifold, twin turbo-smart gates, EFR 9180, beautifully made piping, hollinger, dry sump, autronic ecu and CDI etc etc. so if ever a 9180 is going to be pushed it will be on a car like this.

we have very high hopes. :)

Which model?

That is just awesome, can't wait to hear results... This is going to be the EFRs best chance to prove themselves, I gave up waiting for them to emerge but still hope to see success :)

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible.

Why did they ditch the twins?

Sounds like it was a good idea by that initial report - when is tuning likely to be completed?

A decent single twin scroll turbo is the main thing that has been missing from that car's setup which has managed to have it not holding a special place in my "Man that this is so cool I wish I had one just like it" list :)

That is just awesome, can't wait to hear results... This is going to be the EFRs best chance to prove themselves, I gave up waiting for them to emerge but still hope to see success :)

Sounds like the plot to a cheesy American fighting movie! Hahaha!

not a chance.

Look I'm not going to get into a pissing contest as I own neither and hardly care what people opt to spend their money on, yet here is what I base my comment on:

post-43588-0-67057200-1311296642_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-99119400-1311296633_thumb.jpg

One looks hand crafted, the other looks machine made and tidied up with a die grinder. Fact is, 6b are hand made and FR are machine made, cant change that and it is printed in plain text on the FR site. Such is supply and demand.

I will agree with all you kiddies that the FR is definitely the better looking product on the outside and I would certainly be happy to own one.

And yes 10 years and trip to club med based on two dangerous drive events, so be careful out there guys. As necessary as the law is, those upholding it dont always base their career choice on morals.

Look I'm not going to get into a pissing contest as I own neither and hardly care what people opt to spend their money on, yet here is what I base my comment on:

post-43588-0-67057200-1311296642_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-99119400-1311296633_thumb.jpg

One looks hand crafted, the other looks machine made and tidied up with a die grinder. Fact is, 6b are hand made and FR are machine made, cant change that and it is printed in plain text on the FR site. Such is supply and demand.

I will agree with all you kiddies that the FR is definitely the better looking product on the outside and I would certainly be happy to own one.

And yes 10 years and trip to club med based on two dangerous drive events, so be careful out there guys. As necessary as the law is, those upholding it dont always base their career choice on morals.

I think you may want to re-read that post, because if you wrote it correctly it means you really have NO IDEA what you're talking about. If, somehow you got the names confused.... you're forgiven, we all make mistakes.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...