Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was just recently emailing you and Jon i ended up finding a 1.05 locally however i still need to order the manifold and gates.

what's the lowest boost/power the 38's would be without creeping?

Am chasing somewhere around 700hp however being able to turn the wick down a little would be good.

Also on the gate springs, stock is .5bar does this mean minimum boost will be 1 bar? since there is two gates?

I was just recently emailing you and Jon i ended up finding a 1.05 locally however i still need to order the manifold and gates. what's the lowest boost/power the 38's would be without creeping? Am chasing somewhere around 700hp however being able to turn the wick down a little would be good. Also on the gate springs, stock is .5bar does this mean minimum boost will be 1 bar? since there is two gates?

glad to hear you found an external-WG EFR turbo locally - we only have the EFR Internal-WG models in stock right now. On my RB26 i was running 8374 1.05 a/r with twin 38mm, 1 bar springs. on WG pressure only no problem holding a steady 17psi and with BCSV duty cycle at 100% i ran it to 32-33psi for 704whp (through a high flow cat). here is a short video:

Nope, if each gate cracks at around .5bar then you just have 38mm x2 opening at .5bar

correct - 0.5 bar is 0.5 bar whether there is 1 or 2 wastegates (or more)

I would be surprised if they could hold that turbo at .5bar though :)

i have not seen any severe boost creeping EFR turbos, especially good to see on the internal WG variants!

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

Haltech recommended 220-VP-TURBORPM which has vnet module + sensor but the extra sensor won't be needed.

I searched around and found these 2 v-net modules may work

-230-VM-USM

-230-VM-TURBO SPEED MODULE (USE WITH 800-SS-SPEED)

Has anyone tried these?

Has anyone wired up the turbo speed sensor yet?

I have a Racepak IQ3 dash and wonder if anyone know what module I will need for the turbo speed sensor.

Thanks in advance

I am not a wiring expert, but i think you may need this little box: http://www.full-race.com/store/efr-turbo-accessories/road-rage-gages-tss-turbo-speed-scaler-2.html

How do you guys running the EFR turbos find the boost recoveries between shifts compaired to similar turbos in the garrett range??

;)

Hi Geoff , is the production EFR 7163 out yet ? I think quite a few are looking forward to this one ..

Is there enough evidence to suggest the EFR7163 was a successful concept? I've not seen enough testing to draw an opinion on it, and if it is released does that mean it will replace the 7064? Having both seems strange

Lol both within 1mm OD. Its probably a revision as 1mm on a comp wheel normally won't change much. It likely was done to remove confusion for the older model and anyone who ended up with one.

More signs of afterthought changes rather than pure bred success.

Um no , the EFR 7163 will be the largest of the small series EFRs and it uses a different style of turbine - called mixed flow or something of that nature .

I believe the compressor and turbine housings will be the same as it's three smaller brothers but the wheels are different . There are a couple of prototypes floating around for development but the production units are due out very soon .

This is a link to Fullrace and shows a table of the EFR range , the new EFR7163 will be next after the 500 hp 6758 in that table and its aimed at making a broad spread of power in a compact size for that power range . You'd think same or better response/power than the bulkier 7064 otherwise why would they bother ?

http://www.full-race.com/articles/borgwarner-efr-turbos.html

It's just a shame there is no "T3" flanged twin scroll IW turbine housing for them .

Geoff can tell you more about them , cheers Adrian .

Edited by discopotato03

Haltech recommended 220-VP-TURBORPM which has vnet module + sensor but the extra sensor won't be needed.

I searched around and found these 2 v-net modules may work

-230-VM-USM

-230-VM-TURBO SPEED MODULE (USE WITH 800-SS-SPEED)

Has anyone tried these?

Let us know how you get on with this, I have a EFR with the turbo speed sensor and a IQ3 Display Dash, I've got the Speed Sensor wired to the ViPec but it would be nice to display it.

P.S, Have you managed to get Speed and Odo running on your IQ3, or do you have a IQ3 Logger Dash?

I know of someone that tuned a car with a 6758 and really liked it , they also I think played with a prototype 7163 and it was good as well . I'm told EFRs are generally wide ranging things and I believe they are aiming at compact though they don't look that compact to me turbine housing wise . I think it's difficult to make IW particularly TS IW turbine housings reasonably short and have the waste paths flow well enough . Garrett and Mitsubishi have done it but not with clockwise rotation "T3" flanged turbos .

Sadly there is a market for T3 flanged TS IW turbine housings but not much is being done about it .

Hate to say it but I think single scroll and VATN will be the reality once the moving vane assembly becomes reliable on petrol engines .

Meanwhile I am interested in EFR 7163s but I don't see one on my car .

A .

Sadly there is a market for T3 flanged TS IW turbine housings but not much is being done about it .

Really? What makes you think this?

The R33 is one of the only cars that comes to mind which has a T3 split pulse design and it requires machine work to make it even work as described. Its missing a fairly large part of the splitter toward the turbine entry, and I do not think Nissan ever intended it to have a split pulse purpose but rather just good flow into the turbine housing.

Furthermore, I see a T3 twin scroll as nothing but a hindrance for manifold production, as everything gets smaller and harder to work with 6 pipes going into 2 tiny tubes.

Am unsure there is a market as you say. Cannot help but sense some form of motive in play.

Hi Geoff , is the production EFR 7163 out yet ? I think quite a few are looking forward to this one ..

A .

BW's ETA last year at SEMA and PRI was Q3 2013... we will see what happens but it sounds like sept (maybe? lol). I know everyone hates waiting but the EFR supply is improving. We're seeing product come in, 8374 twinscroll iwg, t3 iwg, and some 9180s coming through also. Twin RB guys 6258 and 6758 are popular but arriving also

Is there enough evidence to suggest the EFR7163 was a successful concept? I've not seen enough testing to draw an opinion on it, and if it is released does that mean it will replace the 7064? Having both seems strange

the 7163 is the largest of the B1 frame turbos and will eventually be available in vband inlet/outlet singlescroll and 0.80 a/r T4 twinscroll configuration. The initial 7163 prototypes were all excellent performers and the production units underwent further development and improvements. it is only a 2.5" inlet and 2" outlet so its not for everyone, but it does have some unique features

the 7064 is the smallest of the B2 frame turbos, and available as t4 twinscroll or t3 singlescroll. I agree there is some overlap here but both are excellent turbos and serve different levels of exhaust flow... For engines that needs more turbine flow this 7064 does that (64mm turbine and 0.92 or 1.05 a/r). We have a professional RB25 drift competitor in the us doing great on that turbo.

the EFR 7163 will be the largest of the small series EFRs and it uses a different style of turbine - called mixed flow or something of that nature .

I believe the compressor and turbine housings will be the same as it's three smaller brothers but the wheels are different . There are a couple of prototypes floating around for development but the production units are due out very soon .

the idea of the 7163 was to make max powerband in the smallest possible package size. The mixed flow turbine wheel is able to acheive this goal nicely. Sorry i do not have any specs for public consumption yet, you can be sure we will post online once they're available

It's just a shame there is no "T3" flanged twin scroll IW turbine housing for them .

ive been running Full-Race for 11 years now, youre the only person whos ever asked for more T3 twinscroll housings ;>

the 7163 is the largest of the B1 frame turbos and will eventually be available in vband inlet/outlet singlescroll and 0.80 a/r T4 twinscroll configuration. The initial 7163 prototypes were all excellent performers and the production units underwent further development and improvements. it is only a 2.5" inlet and 2" outlet so its not for everyone, but it does have some unique features

he idea of the 7163 was to make max powerband in the smallest possible package size. The mixed flow turbine wheel is able to acheive this goal nicely. Sorry i do not have any specs for public consumption yet, you can be sure we will post online once they're available

Ahhh somehow I've missed that - nice :)

ive been running Full-Race for 11 years now, youre the only person whos ever asked for more T3 twinscroll housings ;>

:rofl2:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...