Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Blue is 98, Red is E85

This is with the 7psi springs so will be interesting to see if response picks up with a 14psi springs.

It's also with 272 cams, bigger than the general consensus on here...

post-53650-0-57860900-1464247366_thumb.jpg

Car has run 130mph with my big ass in it, so it makes the power no question.

This is with the 7psi springs so will be interesting to see if response picks up with a 14psi springs.

It will.

It will start spooling earlier. Went from 7 to 15 psi spring and just ran it it off the gate to get base spring pressure and noticed the difference immediately.

What BW's would be recommended for a stock block - if you wanted to retain twins for rwc purposes?

They don't fit in stock locations. They're way too long.

This is what twins look like

AB1D3231-698F-4E76-9FD9-C49917044AE3_zps

C91700BF-E978-462A-B5F2-BD1063C7357B_zps

The smallest twin EFR's (6258's) will do 500 wkw on a well sorted setup. Brightey who posted above has a set on his RB28.

Forget the 0.92. 1.05. Better setup for when you realise the 7670 is too small :D

7670 would be great on RB25, but on RB26 i think too small for anything other than bone stock engine for autox events imo. Maybe if you were limited to low boosthe or wanted to keep revs down for some reason?

7670 would be great on RB25, but on RB26 i think too small for anything other than bone stock engine for autox events imo. Maybe if you were limited to low boosthe or wanted to keep revs down for some reason?

Single EFR for the "-7/-9 on a stock engine" type of build.

How does it compare to the TO4Z you drive a while back?

Speaking to a local turbo guy and he said he can mod a Zed to bring it on 800rpm earlier, make more powa, and improve the already good part throttle transient response. Not sure if its an exaggeration, but interested to hear ur thoughts.

He also mentioned these EFRs and SXEs are very very good.

[emoji2] [emoji2] [emoji2]

Id hazard a guess he'd just throw away old comp wheel and fit the ebay gtx style billet 11 blader that everybody uses?

My mechanic has a EFR 8374 on his built RB26

Made 550kw on e85 on 32-30psi

has 32psi by 4200rpm

i'll see if he'll let me put his dyno graph on here... havent been in it yet but response looks mental

i've also bought an EFR 8374.... mine should be getting overhauled in July hopefully

stock bottom end EFR 8374.... see how we go

  • Like 1

Id hazard a guess he'd just throw away old comp wheel and fit the ebay gtx style billet 11 blader that everybody uses?

Pretty much. I think they machine the housing and put bigger wheels in them. I will find out tomorrow.

My mechanic has a EFR 8374 on his built RB26

Made 550kw on e85 on 32-30psi

has 32psi by 4200rpm

i'll see if he'll let me put his dyno graph on here... havent been in it yet but response looks mental

i've also bought an EFR 8374.... mine should be getting overhauled in July hopefully

stock bottom end EFR 8374.... see how we go

Yeah that E85 is tempting me as well.

I totally believe the 32 psi by 4200 with anywhere near a decent tune on E85.

It's funny how this turbo comes on. It will make the 10 psi on bottom end while cruising and slow spooling, but right around 3800-4k the turbo turns on. I can't wait to get mine to a solid 20 psi on pump. I can NOT imagine what 32 psi on E85 feels like!

  • Like 1

7670 would be great on RB25, but on RB26 i think too small for anything other than bone stock engine for autox events imo. Maybe if you were limited to low boosthe or wanted to keep revs down for some reason?

I just don't really want 500+kW, so why go bigger? More momentum etc with the bigger wheel is my logic

I just don't really want 500+kW, so why go bigger? More momentum etc with the bigger wheel is my logic

You should run it through matchbot, you will hit the right side wall and it will overspeed .

I have tried countless configurations on match bot and rb26/28. The efr 8374 .92 is what I have, but if I could get e85 ( none in Nippon) then I would go 1.05 and wind it up.

I've seen the light haaaaaaa!

Edited by Meathead
  • Like 3
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was once told, who it was I'm to old to remember, that the length of the OEM wheels brace supplied with a vehicle is designed long enough for a average person to apply enough torque to do up, and undo the wheel nuts to the specified torque  What a average person is is anyone's guess though, i.e. average fat bastard, average knuckle head, average perfect sized human......like me Unless of course, a tyre shop has ugga dugga'd them up to "torque to yeild/strip" specs, used cross threading as natures lock tight, or a big breaker bar was used to tighten them up to get some nice stretch in the poor old wheel studs Me, I torque wheel nuts to 1 elbow joint click, lower torque settings are based of wrist clicks, higher torque settings are based of shoulder clunks, or total dislocation for anything that requires all of the torques 
    • I think the catch can design is pretty flawed. Evident in the fact that the V2 one moved to a larger top mounted filter which alone would have helped with overflow and reduce restrictions compared with the side filter. I also imagine there was a major improvement to the baffling design. It is worth mentioning that this catch can with the RB20 was never as much of an issue and the high kms RB25 is likely a part of the problem. I have gotten quotes for both a new "Vibrant Gen 3" catch can and to modify this existing ones but that may have to wait until after the track day. I hope the sump/head breathers/drains and cam splash plates will be enough
    • Yep, both. The ratio is 1.8 instead of OEM being 1.7. The rocker bodies are modified with a larger bolt hole and re-threaded with 10mm holes instead of the 8mm YT has stock. Finding out they don't actually fit the stock castings cause a lot of un-impressment by the person in the USA who tapped the new holes for the 'upgraded' YT product. He was very unhappy with them given their previous design did not require 'clearancing'
    • That too, but I think this is why she's put the work into the cam cover baffles. I mean, a catch can should only need to be a catch can, not an oil air separator also. Not to say that putting the effort into having it do a better job of oil-air sep is a waste of time, but doing the sep earlier is always going to make life better. And that should happen now anyway.
    • I think both. Higher ratio and more stout. I think at least part of his lift increase came from the rocker.
×
×
  • Create New...