Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heres my data.

First tune, ran out of dyno time. Fought boost control for a long time then just went to open loop on Haltech. I should have played with that more before dynoing. Boost on graph is PSI * 10 (for scaling purposes) and is straight from the log. It literally rained while we dyno'd so 100% humidity and 83 deg F ambient.

This is STOCK Haltech timing advance (untouched). Only would knock at 20 psi at 4400 rpms during spike. I'm DEFINITELY losing boost response on this because the logs with the wastegate hose pulled are showing 21 psi at 4100 rpms (as opposed to my lazy 4400 that was kinda of spiking at first).

Anyway, pumpgas 93 (with the 10% ethanol they have in my area).

2.75L BC stroker

New N1 block 86mm bores

tomei poncam A

6boost manifold - divided for IWG EFR

8374 EFR .92 IWG divided

ported head

SS +.5mm valves

squish pads removed

Hypertune V2

stock intercooler

I WILL be ordering the high boost cannister and getting boost leveled out at 16-17 psi for base and using closed loop for tuning. CAR IS AN ABSOLUTE ANIMAL!!!

I bet it has 130 mph in it right now!

Also it should be noted on STOCK intercooler I'm seeing 115 deg F when hammering through the gears (all the way through 4th) on the highway. It was AT LEAST 125 on the dyno every pull. Air temps drop drastically when on it...ironically they increase while you cruise (or sit in traffic). Makes sense as all that is moving is IDLE air. But under load at 18 psi and this power level the stock intercooler is keeping up well so far. Temps pretty much drop the whole time you are in boost. NICE EFFICIENT TURBO HELPS I AM SURE!!

post-136202-0-03103500-1464405381_thumb.png

Thought about water/meth injection?

Is they Hypertune single throttle or multi? Single will hurt response a smidge.

There is no response issue whatsoever. The single 90mm hypertune is not the issue.

The problem is the medium boost cannister for the internal gate on the EFR starts "cracking" open around 9-10 psi...as you adjust it tighter this number goes up slightly, I'm having to keep the port open on the solenoid so long that when it finally comes into boost the boost controller was making it overshoot the target boost at 4500 rpms. If I run JUST wastegate with no boost supply to the cannister it will hit 23 or so at 4100 rpms (this shows what the turbo and engine will do because effectively the gate is held shut. Trust me it's coming on strong, I was tweaking the boost duty cycle in the haltech for it to try to smooth the boost spike (and then resultant FALL) with moderate success - the pull attached is by far the best, but even 2-3% duty cycle changes at rpms were causing drops and spikes. Also on top end the exhaust backpressure is blowing the gate open so I'm dropping boost there too. My duty cycle chart looks silly.

Geoff with full race warned me of this already (previously in this thread).

I'm going to get the high boost cannister and set it to "crack" at 16-17 just on the wastegate and supply hose (no solenoid spill) then try to get it to hold a solid 20 to redline. When this happens...hello 500 whp and hello 20 psi at 4100 rpms. It's going to be stupid. Between 7-8k rpms the car gained nearly 100 whp going from 12.8 psi to 17. I think I have that last 50 or so whp on pump gas at 19-20 psi. If not, the car may need bigger cams.

ALSO I have not TOUCHED the timing. That will help everywhere as well.

Also have not TOUCHED the cams. More changes.

I'll get a video of a little drive today for you so you can see how it spools and drives. "Responsive" is the word of the day :)

There is no response issue whatsoever. The single 90mm hypertune is not the issue.

The problem is the medium boost cannister for the internal gate on the EFR starts "cracking" open around 9-10 psi...as you adjust it tighter this number goes up slightly, I'm having to keep the port open on the solenoid so long that when it finally comes into boost the boost controller was making it overshoot the target boost at 4500 rpms. If I run JUST wastegate with no boost supply to the cannister it will hit 23 or so at 4100 rpms (this shows what the turbo and engine will do because effectively the gate is held shut. Trust me it's coming on strong, I was tweaking the boost duty cycle in the haltech for it to try to smooth the boost spike (and then resultant FALL) with moderate success - the pull attached is by far the best, but even 2-3% duty cycle changes at rpms were causing drops and spikes. Also on top end the exhaust backpressure is blowing the gate open so I'm dropping boost there too. My duty cycle chart looks silly.

Geoff with full race warned me of this already (previously in this thread).

I'm going to get the high boost cannister and set it to "crack" at 16-17 just on the wastegate and supply hose (no solenoid spill) then try to get it to hold a solid 20 to redline. When this happens...hello 500 whp and hello 20 psi at 4100 rpms. It's going to be stupid. Between 7-8k rpms the car gained nearly 100 whp going from 12.8 psi to 17. I think I have that last 50 or so whp on pump gas at 19-20 psi. If not, the car may need bigger cams.

ALSO I have not TOUCHED the timing. That will help everywhere as well.

Also have not TOUCHED the cams. More changes.

I'll get a video of a little drive today for you so you can see how it spools and drives. "Responsive" is the word of the day :)

Do yourself a favour and get a 2 port double acting actuator and a 4 port Mac valve. Lots of tuners swear by them now.

http://www.turbosmartdirect.com/Product-Categories/Turbo-Specific-Actuators/Borg-Warner-EFR-Twin-Port-B1-Single-Scroll-14psi_2.html

Do yourself a favour and get a 2 port double acting actuator and a 4 port Mac valve. Lots of tuners swear by them now.

http://www.turbosmartdirect.com/Product-Categories/Turbo-Specific-Actuators/Borg-Warner-EFR-Twin-Port-B1-Single-Scroll-14psi_2.html

Perfect. Thank you!

I did get the haltech to start running closed loop boost with pretty great success so far.

I didn't realize you can make the closed loop a table just like the open loop. Basically ended up taking my open loop numbers for 17 psi and making them the higher boost table. I didn't play much with it yet but for sure had greater response than before and looks like it will hold more boost up top!

But yes that actuator should solve a lot of my problems.

Oh and this.

https://youtu.be/BVYG2ziS9IM

  • Like 2

Perfect. Thank you!

I did get the haltech to start running closed loop boost with pretty great success so far.

I didn't realize you can make the closed loop a table just like the open loop. Basically ended up taking my open loop numbers for 17 psi and making them the higher boost table. I didn't play much with it yet but for sure had greater response than before and looks like it will hold more boost up top!

But yes that actuator should solve a lot of my problems.

Oh and this.

I have a G4+ and run open loop with a 3D duty cycle table which is a sort of pseudo closed loop and works really well. much easier to set up.

Looks pretty fun.
Got any logs of boost vs rpm vs tps vs time for that or just general spirited driving Patrick?

Pete, have you read much on the evoM forum? Some guys that went 7670, a lot go "bugger it, I'm going 8374". The guys that go 8374 step up to the 9180. It's quite funny to watch.

i'm working on it... Tis an interesting read. Started at 101 and upto about 140 now

If you want 400 KW and that's it a 7670 might be the go. But reaper on here is cracking gates at around 4300 RPM (from memory) on a stock engine (it does have the baby v cam), makes 470 kW using a 8374/1.05. You'll have a reasonably high comp 2.8.

I don't particularly feel the need for anything over 400kw's, no. but yes, there's some pretty good results with the 8374, its just a question of how much response is sacrificed, and additionally, there's the benfit that I could probably go .92 IWG for the 8374 and save money/simplify things a lot.
I came across a comparison between the 7670 EWG and 8374 IWG on a pair of evo's in that thread which did show some pretty significant differences, but that was different engines/dynos etc, and they're smaller than my 2.8.

More research is required

Speaking to a few guys that have these things, the dyno graph doesn't give a true indication of how they drive. How soon are you going to make the decision?

Yeah, there was a nice log of someone over there doing a gear change showing boost recovered in about 3/4 of a second after 100% TPS was re applied (and about 1/2 second for 80% of boost). Pretty impressive.

The sooner I can get stuff ordered the better but at the same time i'm not ordering until i'm 100% sure that I've picked the right setup.

Here is the data for the gear change from 3rd to 4th. Sorry I'm logging ALL channels now so resolution isn't as good as it could be.

My brother also short shifted because the tachometer is off a good bit.

post-136202-0-00874400-1464481438_thumb.png

post-136202-0-49867600-1464481445_thumb.png

post-136202-0-91395700-1464481453_thumb.png

  • Like 1

The power curve goes form very little to very much in a short space of time. That is the definition of on off. Note i didn't say it was bad, also note I also commented how f**king amazing it is having 350+kw for an entire 3500rpm band a few posts later. No need to rant it makes you look silly; the facts are out there and are speaking for themselves, the real issue is the nitty gritty details of what particular size/setup I want to grab :P

Pete im obviously passionate about this stuff so i feel just in having a rant :)

I have done ALOT of research, driven and worked on ALOT of amazing expensive well sorted cars in both twin and single forms and i can tell you that the singles i have driven out performed the twins in response/power and throttle response.

Thing is you say im making myself look silly mate yet all the points i make about singles vs twins none of you "twins guys" can produce any data to prove me wrong?

You say this turbo goes from nothing to everything? Yet it makes 250kw @ 4000 & goes on to make another 300kw up top. No twins EVER do that.

:rolleyes:

Last few posts i've been asking which EFR I should get...

Move on from bashing on twins and help me decide if I want a 7670 or 8374. Main thing is I want the car to be fun to drive in the twisties

Singles are shit

See this is all the data ya typical twin turbo tosser can come up with lol.

:P

I have a 7670 with 1.05 rear for my 2L with mivec and i expect that to be alive before 4K so i believe the 1.05 8374 would probably have you all in around 4000rpm Pete. Don't be scared off the 1.05 thinking it will make your laggy mate :)

  • Like 1

No ego here. After pulling down the twins during my rebuild I decided I was going single no matter what.

I initally thought to use a smaller single when I was thinking of staying 2.6 and actually inquired about the 7670. Geoff with full race gave great advice on not using the 7670 due to potential to overspin on an rb26 (even on pumpgas) and since I'm stroker it would only complicate the matter. After running the match bot models he's dead right. He was also correct in that the 8374 is an awesome fit for an rb26/28 stroker with basic flow mods.

I know I'm just scraping the surface of the turbo now and have plenty left in my tune but I can tell you that drivability is insanely good and top end power is just incredible. I set redline at 8k on mine so far but power is still climbing at that power...so yes the 7670 could probably be fine on a STOCK rb26 if limiting your rpms and dead set on sticking with pump gas.

I will run the numbers on match bot for you if you give me some information about your build.

See this is all the data ya typical twin turbo tosser can come up with lol.

:P

I have a 7670 with 1.05 rear for my 2L with mivec and i expect that to be alive before 4K so i believe the 1.05 8374 would probably have you all in around 4000rpm Pete. Don't be scared off the 1.05 thinking it will make your laggy mate :)

lol I'm on who cares, each to their own side of things. There's no denying the results from singles are great but my twins are doing everything I want.

I was just hoping to ruffle a few feathers while I was a sleep ;)

No ego here. After pulling down the twins during my rebuild I decided I was going single no matter what.

I initally thought to use a smaller single when I was thinking of staying 2.6 and actually inquired about the 7670. Geoff with full race gave great advice on not using the 7670 due to potential to overspin on an rb26 (even on pumpgas) and since I'm stroker it would only complicate the matter. After running the match bot models he's dead right. He was also correct in that the 8374 is an awesome fit for an rb26/28 stroker with basic flow mods.

I know I'm just scraping the surface of the turbo now and have plenty left in my tune but I can tell you that drivability is insanely good and top end power is just incredible. I set redline at 8k on mine so far but power is still climbing at that power...so yes the 7670 could probably be fine on a STOCK rb26 if limiting your rpms and dead set on sticking with pump gas.

I will run the numbers on match bot for you if you give me some information about your build.

Yeah i've been meaning to sit down and learn how to use their matching program but i've had a cold the last few days and its just seemed to hard :P

If you don't mind running the numbers and giving me a rundown that would be neat.

Build is pretty much 2.8L stroker, so 2740cc, 9.5:1 ish compression ratio (very interesting pistons, got to have a gaze at them thismorning), running 260 degree 11mm lift cams. Fuel will be E70. What else is needed for it?

Power goal wise, 400kw is enough, as much response as possible is the more important factor for the type of driving I do, on the street and on country roads.

Yeah i've been meaning to sit down and learn how to use their matching program but i've had a cold the last few days and its just seemed to hard [emoji14]

If you don't mind running the numbers and giving me a rundown that would be neat.

Build is pretty much 2.8L stroker, so 2740cc, 9.5:1 ish compression ratio (very interesting pistons, got to have a gaze at them thismorning), running 260 degree 11mm lift cams. Fuel will be E70. What else is needed for it?

Power goal wise, 400kw is enough, as much response as possible is the more important factor for the type of driving I do, on the street and on country roads.

It would be silly imo to put anything smaller than an 8374 on that engine!

You have a touch more lift on the cams but our builds are almost identical. You planning on running ethanol with the higher compression will likely see full boost at 3800 rpms or less even. I have seen 20.1 psi at 4077 rpms trust me it will drive incredibly well!

I ran the numbers. Mine are almost spot on so far. Search "matchbot"

Yeah i've been meaning to sit down and learn how to use their matching program but i've had a cold the last few days and its just seemed to hard :P

If you don't mind running the numbers and giving me a rundown that would be neat.

Build is pretty much 2.8L stroker, so 2740cc, 9.5:1 ish compression ratio (very interesting pistons, got to have a gaze at them thismorning), running 260 degree 11mm lift cams. Fuel will be E70. What else is needed for it?

Power goal wise, 400kw is enough, as much response as possible is the more important factor for the type of driving I do, on the street and on country roads.

8374 for sure

you'll have 30psi before 4000rpm if everything on the setup is well sorted (e.g. manifold, cams, gears etc etc)

i've orderd my cams, cam gears, springs/retainers. Manifold should be here this week too.

Then its off to get the turbo put on, fuel wiring, custom exhaust and tune!

many excites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
    • I might have gone a little more South Efrican.  But this is off topic.   😍😍 FD 😍😍
    • I think you might have skipped a whole vowel sounds there C.
×
×
  • Create New...