Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, mr skidz said:

Loading the engine in 5th for 12 seconds to make 18psi?

Not usually the type of data I look for but what the hell.

8374 vs -5 in real world terms you CANNOT compare.

Everyone that has gone between them both can't be wrong. -5 = prehistoric. Period.

 

Loading the engine in 5th for 12 seconds to make 18psi?

Not usually the type of data I look for but what the hell.


I had both -5's and an untuned efr 8374 1.05 rear on a build 3L poncams 9.15 to 1, the efr belts the -5's out of the park.

What experience do you have with single efr turbo?
  • Like 2
8374 vs -5 in real world terms you CANNOT compare.

Everyone that has gone between them both can't be wrong. -5 = prehistoric. Period.

 

Both logs on both cars were taken from Street Logs which is real world so what are you talking about?

While I have your attention paul I'd appreciate if you didn't text message your bbq buddies little little snippets of info regarding me as you don't know my background at all.

The same way you would text message me when other members would chime in and you would disagree with them too.

It's a forum don't take it so personal.

2 minutes ago, mr skidz said:


Both logs on both cars were taken from Street Logs which is real world so what are talking about?

While I have your attention paul I'd appreciate if you didn't text message your bbq buddies little little snippets of info regarding me as you don't know my background at all.
The same way you would text message me when other members would chime in and you would disagree with them too.
It's a forum don't take it so personal.

So no answer for the experience between EFR and -5?

For what it's worth, most of mates are watching this thread and have woken up to the fact that GT dinosaurs are that, dinosaurs and have moved on. Not taking it personal.

when there is data off Motec logs that an 8374 vs -5 are "on" in 1/3rd the time, what are you trying to defend?

 

I had both -5's and an untuned efr 8374 1.05 rear on a build 3L poncams 9.15 to 1, the efr belts the -5's out of the park.

What experience do you have with single efr turbo?

The word "belts" doesn't impress me. what does it actually do better is the question I'm looking for apart from making more power as I expect it should it's a single using an external wastegate.

Let's not take this out of context and get it twisted, I've never once said -5's are the greatest!

everyone from 1 comment can take everything out of context.

I'm on this page to see a comparison don't get it twisted.


The word "belts" doesn't impress me what does it actually do better is the question I'm looking for apart from making more power as I expect it should it's a single using an external wastegate.

Let's not take this out of context and get it twisted I've never once said dash fives other greatest everyone from 1 comment can take everything out of context I'm on this page to see a comparison don't get it twisted

On the same car, an 8374 with the big "1.05 rear" and the -5's, the EFR won;
- low end
- up high
- transient response

Take your precious twin turbo's that look stock. This thread isn't about looking stock.
Why has it turned into a -5 vs EFR thread?

On the same car, an 8374 with the big "1.05 rear" and the -5's, the EFR won;
- low end
- up high
- transient response

Take your precious twin turbo's that look stock. This thread isn't about looking stock.
Why has it turned into a -5 vs EFR thread?

who cares about looking stock just want to see the difference don't disagree with your results but I haven't seen any.
2 minutes ago, mr skidz said:


who cares about looking stock just want to see the difference don't disagree with your results but I haven't seen any.

You care because you asked "if it looks like this then ok" or word to that effect.

Go back a few pages.

Edited by Piggaz
You care because you asked "if it looks like this then ok" or word to that effect.

Go back a few pages.


The only time I bring up my car looking stock is because people wonder why the f**k I use them and this is my only reason!!

I don't get your point I'm not interested in the stock argument anymore I'm curious about the difference in this so call response it's the only reason I dropped my logs on this thread otherwise I don't give a f**k about anything else

Who gives a f**k if it "doesn't impress you" you post ALOT of junk and you clearly dont know shit! Comments to harris racing like "a 3" exhaust is fine because you have external wastegates"  seriously dude REALLY LOL??? Or comments like "i dont need an intercooler because i will be running E85" that is seriously rookie shit! 

Arguing with a bloke like you who is narrow minded and thinks he knows it all but doesn't know what he is on about is pointless! 

It "belts em everywhere" because it  responds to throttle inputs faster, it comes on to boost faster, its power delivery is smoother, has a broader power and torque band, it is easier and better to drive than the twins because it has removed all the factory restrictions/packaging issues? Whats not to understand man?

This bloke has experienced BOTH setups but his input doesn't count for anything? Just to correct you its a single running TWIN external gates. But i dont know what twin wastegates that control boost have anything to do with just how well these turbos perform???

I know you have an online street tuna certificate but you are seriously the tuna John West rejects that makes John West the best! 

 

  • Like 1

who cares about looking stock just want to see the difference don't disagree with your results but I haven't seen any.

I don't understand that you don't understand 500rpm earlier than -5's. There are 3 other drivers that have driven the car untuned and have said the same comment, what other result are you after or you being ignorant of the result?

To be fair it would be quite good to have more real-world logging of how these EFRs perform, I don't see any issue with what Skidz is saying would be nice to have.  It would have been epic to have had logging  data of the drive we went for in Brett's car, response is subjective while data is data.

Look forward to intune's results and hope some data logs from a well setup and tuned EFR can be caught and shared 

  • Like 1
Who gives a f**k if it "doesn't impress you" you post ALOT of junk and you clearly dont know shit! Comments to harris racing like "a 3" exhaust is fine because you have external wastegates"  seriously dude REALLY LOL??? Or comments like "i dont need an intercooler because i will be running E85" that is seriously rookie shit! 

Arguing with a bloke like you who is narrow minded and thinks he knows it all but doesn't know what he is on about is pointless! 

It "belts em everywhere" because it  responds to throttle inputs faster, it comes on to boost faster, its power delivery is smoother, has a broader power and torque band, it is easier and better to drive than the twins because it has removed all the factory restrictions/packaging issues? Whats not to understand man?

This bloke has experienced BOTH setups but his input doesn't count for anything? Just to correct you its a single running TWIN external gates. But i dont know what twin wastegates that control boost have anything to do with just how well these turbos perform???

I know you have an online street tuna certificate but you are seriously the tuna John West rejects that makes John West the best! 

 


Coming from a bloke who takes 12 months to tack up an exhaust that's impressive!

hope you don't charge by the hour.

oh that's right you owe piggaz enough money as it is pay your f**king bills.

Maybe you can pay off your bill by liking more comments.

Wouldn't knock HPA online courses either, there's is a wealth of knowledge on there and they're also followed by all major tuning workshops in Australia so that's telling you something.
On 7/29/2016 at 3:24 PM, usmair said:

Not long now!

Hopefully at tuners in a week

13843414_10208496712728140_258894425_o (1).jpg

So anyway, all arguing aside...

I'm really keen to see the results of this setup as I think it's more representative of what the 'everyday SAU user' could achieve. Stock bottom end, 8374 with 1.05 rear housing, 264 cams, 3.5" exhaust and e85. No RB30 / VCAM etc.

  • Like 1

LOL @ this guy trying to get all personal! Whatever works for ya baldie! Cant argue with facts so trying to get all personal to take the attention away from your stupidity huh? All i know is you cant build a car for shit Mr 110kw @ 4000 rpm from a 2.8L stroker on -5's! Nice result man you made half the power of piggies car at those revs and fell 100kw short up top! I hope E85 nets ya 400kw at best mate! 

Your car is a nugget man so move on! Why ever you feel the need to come in this thread arguing about these turbos vs your soggy turd sandwich with blokes that have gone away from 5s to an EFR is beyond me...

Who cares if your car is making a claimed 19 psi at 3680rpm or whatever dribble you are claiming! You probably had the handbrake on at the time? Or were you too busy looking at your laptop to see the lil red light handbrake light on on ya dash?!

I bet the car still ain't moving at 3700rpm is it?! I bet it still needs another 1000rpm before it kicks you up the ass like every other twins setup that has been done a million times before you does?! 

I never said HPA courses weren't good! So tell me if they are followed by all major shops here in Oz why was it your tuner couldn't optimise your setup 1st attempt? But then you watched a few vids online and went for a drive with your laptop and "made your car far better"? Those holes in that airbox must really of helped huh? ?

 

Keep the thread on track and stop arguing with people's experiences with EFR's trying to derail this thread with ya twin turbo bollocks! 

 

 

 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
    • I might have gone a little more South Efrican.  But this is off topic.   😍😍 FD 😍😍
    • I think you might have skipped a whole vowel sounds there C.
×
×
  • Create New...