Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah man run that -5 on the track and get us some 1/4 mile results with logs. It's an exceptionally hot and humid summer here this year but when it cools I'll run the car some more.

@HarrisRacing - What exhaust manifold are you running, and what ID runners does it have?  

Skidz - anything involving corners throws HEAPS of variables into the game which make it next to impossible to compare turbo performance

13 minutes ago, Lithium said:

@HarrisRacing - What exhaust manifold are you running, and what ID runners does it have?  

Skidz - anything involving corners throws HEAPS of variables into the game which make it next to impossible to compare turbo performance

6boost IWG divided T4 for EFR. no clue on diameters but I'm sure I could ask Kyle.

24 minutes ago, mr skidz said:

Roll Racing sounds like something that doesn't require a steering wheel emoji14.png

Come next track day at Wakefield that trak-life & Yez Racing organise.. the September one is full unfortunately. $235 per car, untimed, unlimited track no sessions.

  • Like 1
@HarrisRacing - What exhaust manifold are you running, and what ID runners does it have?  

Skidz - anything involving corners throws HEAPS of variables into the game which make it next to impossible to compare turbo performance


I thought it was an invite to go have some fun not compare turbo's [emoji54]
Come next track day at Wakefield that trak-life & Yez Racing organise.. the September one is full unfortunately. $235 per car, untimed, unlimited track no sessions.

Will do definitely at some stage last time I went to Wakefield in my last Gtr I ended up spending the whole day in rear wheel drive ripping skids with the gtst boys got some footage of it somewhere.

But I think my first track day in this car will be at the creek as I know the creek really well from many bike sessions I've done over the years I've only been to Wakefield once so I'd be useless there and besides my car still uses completely stock brakes they're not the greatest I think we all know that but for the most part it's just my streetcar / daily nothing serious just a fun car.

damnit  just went to get you guys some logs + videos and popped the axle out hammering around the first turn. Gets violent with the 3 wheel drive. need to change the circlip on the axle.

3 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

There are people with results however they can't be bothered sharing. One of those people just pulled off their setup to go bigger lol

Hey not my fault I pulled it apart before everyone asked for stats!

I just wanna go fast

  • Like 1

^^ Looks pretty quick!

Took the liberty of converting my dyno data from 10 psi and 17 psi and putting in excel graphs. BLUE lines are data associated with 17 psi pull, RED lines are data associated with 11 psi pull. Boost is in PSI, but is multiplied by 10 for scaling purposes (so 100=10.0 psi and 200=20.0 psi).

Also I believe the turbo would have made 380-385 whp if revved to 8k rpms on the 11 psi pull...I was hesitant at first because this was literally the first dyno pull. It did make 371 whp at 7600 rpms though.

dyno 10 vs 17.JPG

  • Like 1

I'll get another dyno run done on this pump tune of mine out of curiosity , as my first dyno tune was over 1000rpm laggier than my current tune at 18psi when set to 25psi.
(Someone else tuned it as we needed load on the fresh engine)

Cool vids too I enjoyed watching them all
[emoji4][emoji108]





Hi :)

I have a question, what power can make 7670 1.05 on RB26 forged + cams + pb98? With no exceed 27psi?

Previously i wanna 8374 .92 but i look on HarrisRacing 2.75l RB and i think it be too laggy for stock capacity and daily drive. 7670 1.05 should spool 300-400 rpms faster? 

I just need 630 EU hp on crank :D

 

If going 7670 I would stick with a 2.6L and stock cams. Turbo will be at maximum speed for sure and you will need to add a road rage gauge to make sure you don't destroy it from overspinning. I wouldn't suggest running the boost over 20 psi over 7k rpms. I bet it will *just* make your HP number though. It would be a VERY fun daily driver.

Reason why I say stock cams is because you will start to choke that turbo on top end on the exhaust side and larger (ie-overlapping) cams will only make the backpressure contamination worse in the cylinder.

When I was comparing the 8374 to the 7670 I think I found that the 7670 should hit full boost 500 rpms sooner than the 8374 and make similar power up until around 7k where the 8374 will continue to feed the motor. Of course I was probably looking at 2.75L at the time so I'm sure a 7670 on stock cams and 2.6L is a good choice for a street car that occasionally wants to turn up the boost.

33 minutes ago, Snara said:

Hi :)

I have a question, what power can make 7670 1.05 on RB26 forged + cams + pb98? With no exceed 27psi?

Previously i wanna 8374 .92 but i look on HarrisRacing 2.75l RB and i think it be too laggy for stock capacity and daily drive. 7670 1.05 should spool 300-400 rpms faster? 

I just need 630 EU hp on crank :D

 

Someone might be able to correct me if my math is wrong, but @ 27psi, but that turbo is going to be out of the efficiency range for your setup. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...