Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, HarrisRacing said:

 


Yep. No way to keep boost high enough on top end without changing duty cycle throughout rpm. Mine is almost linear on duty cycle for rpms after it onsets.

You mean it increases linearly, not you have a flat duty cycle ?

Is yours IWG ?

Yes IWG. And yes increases pretty much linearly.

I posted a log on here not far back. If you download the haltech datalog viewer you can see my output duty cycle on the logs under "boost control output" (which is controlled by open loop) and also my "base duty cycle" (which is my start point before controls - basically my duty cycle map). Just double click those to populate the charts and add the RPM THE same way to see what mine is doing on the high boost IWG BW actuator set at 6 turns from base.


  • Like 1

Found it. White line is boost control output. Notice it's 100% while it spools until it hits my commanded boost number to start open loop control. You can see its pretty linear with RPM to maintain my 18 or so psi boost.
6caa52e8bdeeebcd873bc390c14d3d35.jpg

  • Like 1
On 8/15/2016 at 8:51 AM, VFRegal said:

got a turbosmart dual port locally. It wouldn't hold boost. So changed EBC to one which can have different duties at different rpm but apparently made no difference on the dyno. Pretty much I don't think tuner likes the turbo :blink:.

VFregal - which turbosmart IWG spring and how much preload are you using?  More than likely you need more springs in the IWG actuator..

06968505-727C-4763-AF61-05D22EFEF8EB_zps

Here is Nicks sheet. 8.9:1, RB 30, 8374 1.05, 260 poncams. Timing on the gears is +1 intake, 0 exhaust. Boost is 25 through the middle and purposely pulled back to 23 psi up top. It's also been held back a tad through the middle. There is definitely more left in this but a few kms needs to be put on it, see what Nick wants and a few touch ups/"customisation" made.

EASILY on 500 RPM earlier on than -5's as a comparison. I won't repeat myself with how it drives, I'll sound like a broken record.

the tuner tried advancing the intake cam to +6 degrees on the intake and all it did was come on SO early it introduced surge. It's not very often of the cam timing having to be relaxed because the turbo is on TOO early! He said this combo on the street would be VERY hard to find. It is the most responsive and torquey GTR he has ever tuned. Maybe he hasn't tuned a stroker/-5 combo ;). He also said if the owner wanted he would like to see a 9180 on it and advance the cam a bit and it wouldn't give away too much.

The Dyno sheet doesn't give any real world indication of how well this thing drives!

So more power down low, extra 40 up high, better transient, and smoother delivery with more left in it. Standard position low mount twins in the bin, EFR for the win!

  • Like 3

^^^^ Please tell me you have some 17-18 psi data!?

I'm assuming E85? I'm glad to start seeing other "real" numbers. I mean this is 620 whp on 25 or so PSI. I am hoping to see 550 whp on my car at the same boost on the 2.75L. I'd love to compare logs to this thing on the street to see how far I have to go.

Also I'm on the Poncam A's (260 and 256 ex) and found that closest to 0-0 made the best results for me too. I tried getting them closer together and it felt "stumpy" in the mid range.

Excellent results!

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Piggaz said:

06968505-727C-4763-AF61-05D22EFEF8EB_zps

Here is Nicks sheet. 8.9:1, RB 30, 8374 1.05, 260 poncams. Timing on the gears is +1 intake, 0 exhaust. Boost is 25 through the middle and purposely pulled back to 23 psi up top. It's also been held back a tad through the middle. There is definitely more left in this but a few kms needs to be put on it, see what Nick wants and a few touch ups/"customisation" made.

EASILY on 500 RPM earlier on than -5's as a comparison. I won't repeat myself with how it drives, I'll sound like a broken record.

the tuner tried advancing the intake cam to +6 degrees on the intake and all it did was come on SO early it introduced surge. It's not very often of the cam timing having to be relaxed because the turbo is on TOO early! He said this combo on the street would be VERY hard to find. It is the most responsive and torquey GTR he has ever tuned. Maybe he hasn't tuned a stroker/-5 combo ;). He also said if the owner wanted he would like to see a 9180 on it and advance the cam a bit and it wouldn't give away too much.

The Dyno sheet doesn't give any real world indication of how well this thing drives!

So more power down low, extra 40 up high, better transient, and smoother delivery with more left in it. Standard position low mount twins in the bin, EFR for the win!

Looks really good. Awesome results. I don't know much about RB30's. How do you think this would compare to a 26/7/8 RB motor instead?

59 minutes ago, minesskyline said:

Looks really good. Awesome results. I don't know much about RB30's. How do you think this would compare to a 26/7/8 RB motor instead?

Obviously things like engine compression, cam choice/settings, exhaust size etc would play a part in the response. But lets say a 2.8L (because building a 2.7L is silly lol) would probably be around 2-300rpm laggier worst case scenario i would think ?

 

1 hour ago, HarrisRacing said:

^^^^ Please tell me you have some 17-18 psi data!?

I'm assuming E85? I'm glad to start seeing other "real" numbers. I mean this is 620 whp on 25 or so PSI. I am hoping to see 550 whp on my car at the same boost on the 2.75L. I'd love to compare logs to this thing on the street to see how far I have to go.

Also I'm on the Poncam A's (260 and 256 ex) and found that closest to 0-0 made the best results for me too. I tried getting them closer together and it felt "stumpy" in the mid range.

Excellent results!

Yeah thats E85. No logs as the car is still in the shop man lol. 

Your car runs a 3" exhaust doesn't it? If so i honestly think that would be hurting your response a bit and will probably become alot more of an issue when u really start looking to put some more boost into it ?

3.5" minimum would probably help things quite a bit. 

We will try getting some vids up on the weekend when we go for a blast ?

 

9 hours ago, Full-Race Geoff said:

VFregal - which turbosmart IWG spring and how much preload are you using?  More than likely you need more springs in the IWG actuator..

Hi Geoff,

19 psi spring combination and about 4 or 5 turns preload. I'd like to try out my more preload but tuner was against it saying it wont make any difference.
I am going to take the car elsewhere it's just waiting on a new gearbox at the moment. Interested on your thoughts on spring size for target boost pressure.

Cheers

Edited by VFRegal

why isn't everyone that runs external gates or a dual port actuator for IWG using a 4 port boost solenoid?

seems like the obvious choice to me. at 100% duty you KNOW the gate is clamped shut.

Edited by burn4005
9 hours ago, Piggaz said:

06968505-727C-4763-AF61-05D22EFEF8EB_zps

Here is Nicks sheet. 8.9:1, RB 30, 8374 1.05, 260 poncams. Timing on the gears is +1 intake, 0 exhaust. Boost is 25 through the middle and purposely pulled back to 23 psi up top. It's also been held back a tad through the middle. There is definitely more left in this but a few kms needs to be put on it, see what Nick wants and a few touch ups/"customisation" made.

so boost held at 23-25 psi at the moment due to wanting to run the engine in more?

I just dropped mine off to the tuner this morning. Told him to whack 30psi in to the stock motor haha

  • Like 1
2 minutes ago, usmair said:

so boost held at 23-25 psi at the moment due to wanting to run the engine in more?

I just dropped mine off to the tuner this morning. Told him to whack 30psi in to the stock motor haha

Engine is run in. Boost is currently held back as the speed sensor isn't operating currently so he's kinda capping it there for safety currently. He believes its pretty close to being all in as the most he has seen a 8374 make on his dyno is 480kw i believe he said. 

 

5 minutes ago, Mick_o said:

Engine is run in. Boost is currently held back as the speed sensor isn't operating currently so he's kinda capping it there for safety currently. He believes its pretty close to being all in as the most he has seen a 8374 make on his dyno is 480kw i believe he said. 

interesting. fairly big difference in power on different dynos. ive seen them make 550kw on a dyno.

I'm not sure they would max out on 25psi though. I know of a setup running 32-34 and it made more n more power with every psi up to around 34 psi.

 

1 minute ago, usmair said:

 

interesting. fairly big difference in power on different dynos. ive seen them make 550kw on a dyno.

I'm not sure they would max out on 25psi though. I know of a setup running 32-34 and it made more n more power with every psi up to around 34 psi.

 

Yeah but it all comes down to engine efficiency.

It's good to see Nick's car with some decent compression rather than the low compression rb's designed for 50 pounds of boost we normally see from Sydney).

1 minute ago, acsplit said:

Yeah but it all comes down to engine efficiency.

It's good to see Nick's car with some decent compression rather than the low compression rb's designed for 50 pounds of boost we normally see from Sydney).

yes i do recall this particular engine was very low comp.

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, burn4005 said:

why isn't everyone that runs external gates or a dual port actuator for IWG using a 4 port boost solenoid?

seems like the obvious choice to me. at 100% duty you KNOW the gate is clamped shut.

On that angle, anyone know a supplier of those in Australia?

45 minutes ago, sneakey pete said:

On that angle, anyone know a supplier of those in Australia?

what do you mean? it's just a 4 port MAC valve. (46A-AA1-JDBA-1BAA)

s-l500.jpg[/img]

they're 100ish bucks delivered on ebay.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/HI-TEMP-MAC-Boost-Solenoid-Valve-BCS-4-port-AEM-MAC-46A-AA1-JDBA-1BA-NICKEL-/232031631192?hash=item360629b758:g:WrMAAOSw3ydVzVlf

Edited by burn4005
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...