Jump to content
SAU Community

[Closed] Borg Warner Efr Series Turbos


Lithium

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, mr skidz said:

I'd like to think that any turbo combo would slingshot from 4000 onwards.

You say that like you've never driven a stock displacement GTR with -5s or 2530s.  By my pants they do next to nothing when you first stab them at 4000rpm.

 

48 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

There's always going to be a 'best'. All I was really saying is there's diminishing returns and you start splitting hairs between 2-3 great options all within a very small window of difference.

The bigger and most notable difference is going to something modern.

Agreed fully with this.  I started this thread for interest in regards to a company bringing turbos to the general populace which has the kind of features previously only available to big budget race teams etc - for not THAT kind of budget.  Anyone who thinks of EFRs as cost effective performance are being silly, they are not race team expensive turbos which are race team spec BUT they're still definitely a fair bit more expensive than your typical units but due to the fact they're still exhaust driven superchargers they will not offer any magical different performance, just an edge.  That edge can matter more to some than others.

The other thing which is the part which is ever hard to quantify is how much "lighter" they feel under foot, I've said this much earlier but will re-iterate - this whole EFR (ie, TiAL exhaust wheel, twin scroll etc) experience fully applied correctly is much the same as comparing journal bearing versus ball bearing turbos back in the day.  People used to waahhh on that ball bearing cores were overrated and that journal bearings were just as good, it was all a sales thing - but as more and more people experienced the transient response difference in real terms things moved more and more in the direction of ball bearing turbos.  Even Hypergear have basically stated they're phasing out the JB range and going to ball bearing. 

From the perspective of someone who has been following turbo tech/tuning for decades now, this is all just the same old shit.  You want a bit more performance, you have to pay more money - the cost goes up exponentially for linear gains but it still results in better performance, its up to the individual to decide how worthwhile it is to them... and this thread is not about pandering to individuals with individual tastes, its about discussing whats here, whats on the horizon, and how things have gone with them to make them more than just a unicorn.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, how about this.

My car - stock 26 with a twin scroll EFR 8374 vs my brother's car stock 26 with a twin scroll ball bearing 6262.

Aside from turbo, both setups are very similar. Both are on e85.

My brother is making 460kw and I have his dyno sheet handy. Once mine is done (hopefully this week) I will put up both dyno print outs and we can compare till the cows come home.

Only doing dynos, cant be ass'd doing actual logging.

But i will drive my brother's GTR and my GTR back to back and provide a butt on seat review.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, how about this.

My car - stock 26 with a twin scroll EFR 8374 vs my brother's car stock 26 with a twin scroll ball bearing 6262.

Aside from turbo, both setups are very similar. Both are on e85.

My brother is making 460kw and I have his dyno sheet handy. Once mine is done (hopefully this week) I will put up both dyno print outs and we can compare till the cows come home.

Only doing dynos, cant be ass'd doing actual logging.

But i will drive my brother's GTR and my GTR back to back and provide a butt on seat review.


What boost is your brothers car running with the Precision?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once I get my boost controller installed to stabilize boost and tuned I'll have a decent comparison with a few people here.

I'v pretty much got same setup as Piggaz in terms of 2.8 stroker, 6 boost manifold, twin 38mm gates but I run a 6262. Although he has much more headwork and V cam it'll still be comparable. I always wanted an efr but ended up with a precision, don't know why lol.

Iv been following this tread for ages now!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, usmair said:

ok, how about this.

My car - stock 26 with a twin scroll EFR 8374 vs my brother's car stock 26 with a twin scroll ball bearing 6262.

Aside from turbo, both setups are very similar. Both are on e85.

My brother is making 460kw and I have his dyno sheet handy. Once mine is done (hopefully this week) I will put up both dyno print outs and we can compare till the cows come home.

Only doing dynos, cant be ass'd doing actual logging.

But i will drive my brother's GTR and my GTR back to back and provide a butt on seat review.

Your brothers 6262 must be  close to maxed @ 460kw , they are rated at 675BHP or the CEA at 705BHP , but who knows just how much they can do??

Look forward to see the results :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I'm asking, I had 410kw on a 2.6 and that's all she'd make, in saying that my engine was very tired.

Now on a 2.8 I have 420kw on only 20psi but was told not to expect it to go much over 480kw if that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a precision, i run 500+, ive built quiet a few 500+ cars. Boost pressure is irrelevant.  Comparing a turbo that is in its peak efficiency range at sub 200krpm and sub 30psi to a turbo specifically designed to turn much harder and have an efficiency range and compressor map to 50+psi is like comparing your sister to a supermodel. Precision designed the CEA turbos to outperform at the limit, and i can guarentee this, they do. BW designed a turbo to outperform in response vs boost and i can guarentee they have there too. I have personally run a 6466 with a .84 housing at 55psi on a relatively mild stroker and seen over 640kw on e85. Thats with basic headwork and stock valves. I have also personally seen a BW EFR 8374 on an evo make stupid numbers but fall on its ass at 30psi, but drive like a big block once on song. IMO,  its down to choice. You want big block response and big turbo top end, build a 632cube turbo. You want the most you can squeeze  out of a small cube donk, build accordingly and probably, at this stage, build with a precision. You want a street light missile then build with an efr. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Allan , good to get someone elses input to this that knows what he wants, I have a 6266 , but thinking of going to the 8374 to help get it a bit more snappy low end. Happy with keeping the psi around 25 on E85 as it gives me everything  I need.

It is what the individual wants from his ride that matters. I just listen to like minded people to get there :)

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Your brothers 6262 must be  close to maxed @ 460kw , they are rated at 675BHP or the CEA at 705BHP , but who knows just how much they can do??

Look forward to see the results :)

Mine went 552kw with a 6262 CEA at the hubs on 30psi so I'd imagine it's not at its limits yet 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just goes to show you, how can you believe the manufactures?

I have a 6266 CEA Gen2 , rated at 800BHP and my tuner said it is close to maxed at 461KW, so about 45kw left in it going off the manufacturer.

So your 552kw is 740whp and 852BHP on the 6262CEA , about 150BHP over the suggested ratings by the manufacture, that is great , so going on that I should get close to 950BHP + on the 6266CEA Gen2

Maybe my 3.2Lt donk has something to do with it not being able to get to the BHP levels you have achieved on a smaller turbo ??

I was also told I will only get around the same KWs with the 8374 if I put it on, but better response, YEAH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw hp ratings are silly for turbos. They can be exceeded and also fell short of depending on the setup.

 

In terms of hub dyno numbers a couple of people I know  have hit 600wkw with EFR8374s on hub dynos on E85

Edited by Lithium
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Fwiw hp ratings are silly for turbos. They can be exceeded and also fell short of depending on the setup.

 

In terms of hub dyno numbers a couple of people have hit 600wkw with EFR8374s on hub dynos on E85

I'd love to see what correction they are using to get 600kw out of a 8374, would be interesting? Jeff's R14 did 525kw on a EFR8374 on same hub dyno we use on 2 bar.

In saying that my set up has always made around 30-40hp more than set up GTX3582R on the same dyno, same correction etc. Generally the GTX seem to top out around the 500kw mark, mine used to go 525kw and when we turned it right up to 11 (with a extra few pounds of boost and 2 more degrees of timing) it gained another 25kw again on top of that. Now days with my new stock motor and smaller cams (Tomei Poncam Type R) it's hovering around 515kw.

I just checked and Matt's RB30 EFR8374 went 450kw on the same dyno but with a much lower 1.6bar which is very similar to the power mine makes at that boost.

Edited by SimonR32
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SAE, 1.00TCF on 35psi on a Subaru.

Plenty of people have gone from GTX3582 to 8374s and picked up good power, the Falcon guys in Oz were probably the first I know of to do the switch...the first one to do the swap did solid 9s with one then low 9s with a 9180 with full interior.  I forget there is no point claiming power figures as you guys seem to make a big deal if you don't agree even if sulking because it's more than you expect, those EFRs both made enough to make a 1800kg car go well over 130mph in the quarter.

Whatever your maths make of it.

 

Attached this just to show the correction etc of the 8374 on the Subaru.  I know it's going to be ignored for some reason or another but it's there because I have it and someone might find it interesting.

FB_IMG_1472028861537.jpg

 

I might tap out from here as I sense the same old circles gaining momentum, the previous comments on choose what works for you, what you can afford or what you know and go with that. No point arguing.  Just realise that other people who have conflicting opinions or thoughts to you can have every bit as much knowledge and experience as you, if not more - and may have made their decisions on more than a whim.  You clearly rate the 6262 as better, so you have chosen an option which is perfect for you - well done, that is great... it would be folly for me to criticise the selection given the results and your feelings on it.  What puzzles me is what you are doing in this thread.

 

Peace all, I might pop back in briefly before the end of the year as there will be some more activity relevant to my interests but otherwise have fun

FB_IMG_1472028861537.jpg

Edited by Lithium
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI.

Just drove my car to work this morning in a little over a week (don't know if you've heard on the news about all of the flooding in my area of the world, but thank God we are OK - lots of our friends were not so fortunate).

I trimmed my fuel map a good bit leaner to correct my AFR after fixing my voltage issues and the car is significantly smoother to drive again.

My final PUMP GAS assessment (and I'm on a 2.75L stroker). The 8374 EFR .92 IWG is a very drivable turbo for a streetcar. It starts coming on STRONG at 3700 rpms and pulls all the way till I bang the limiter which is currently at 8k. At 20 psi boost I could easily autox the car and it's definitely responsive enough to do this. I can 100% vouch that I am HAPPY for the amount of power it makes now and the powerband of my engine. I built my motor to go 9k so at the current 8k limit I'm very pleased with the delivery and response of the turbo. I'm even more pleased that there is still 10-15 psi of boost and possibly 150-200 more HP left in my setup when I move to E85. For pump gas SOME may think this powerband is a bit laggy, but hey...the RB is NOT a big motor and you WILL be giving up lots of power if you size something that magically spools at 3k rpms. They are currently building an E85 station RIGHT BY MY HOUSE that is supposed to be completed in November so get ready for some cold weather and high-boost E85 numbers coming soon. I'll save my pennies for a couple of extra fuel pumps and some GIANT injectors and let you guys know how this thing really performs.

But don't forget it made already on 93 pump:

376 whp on 10 psi

464 whp on 17 psi (88 whp gain from only 7 psi boost) - also ran 11.70 @ 120 with this tune.

I'm estimating (and will dyno again soon) 500 whp on 20 psi on 93 pump with conservative timing.

And when I put in E85 I'm sure the sky is the limit (or Trans as I am on a bone-stock R32 box currently).

I'm kinda with you Lithium...It gets strange just looking at dyno numbers from "X" car on the internet. I provided logs and videos correlating them, and others posted driving videos of their cars in competition (so did I), which should give plenty of information for those looking to go bigger.

I personally would not put a precision on my car for the reason that I think the EFR has more to offer for the money and more engineering data behind it should I make changes in the future (the wheel speed attachment point is one GREAT feature to start with).

That being said, I understand the guys with -5's not wanting to swap their setups and I understand 100% the labor, time and money involved in that swap...I likely would NOT remove -5 turbos if they were on my car - but I went from stock turbos to the 8374EFR and honestly with the: Integrated BOV, integrated wastegate, oversized ball bearings, CNC compressor wheel, Gamma-Ti exhaust wheel, stainless steel housing, V-Band ready compressor housing, and wheel speed sensor ready boss - it's a GREAT value in a very reliable and responsive turbo. Not that I would do this, but the simplicity that I have with my setup is such that in 45 minutes I could 100% remove my turbo, wastegate, intake, and blow off valve from my car and bolt on the 1,000HP 9180 in it's place <-- this was added bonus for me.

I stayed with the IWG .92 because I got the turbo for $1640 USD shipped straight from Ebay (seller HAD to have listed the price wrong, but they honored the sale). Think about it...that's a world-class BB turbo, wastegate, and BOV for less than the cost of most other singles before you add a BOV or single wastegate to them (and lots of guys are running twin gates). So add in a 6 boost manifold (you guys all get them for less than I do) and honestly it was a no-brainer great deal on this setup even compared to me going -5's with new gaskets, lines, hot pipes, etc.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, s2d4 said:


EFRs can't be over spun apparently.

You can overspin an EFR, just expect to have a nice paperweight afterwards.

Realistically, overspin a garrett, or precision, it will fail eventually also. Just because it works in short spurts, doesn't mean its doing what it should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can overspin an EFR, just expect to have a nice paperweight afterwards.

Realistically, overspin a garrett, or precision, it will fail eventually also. Just because it works in short spurts, doesn't mean its doing what it should.


In the past, if the turbo stopped making power, that'd be where you'd have stopped as it would be out of its efficiency zone. The turbo speed didn't seem so crucial as you would have stopped prior to the limit or the limit is much higher and/or not catastrophic immediately.

With the EFR's and the combination of E85, the rpm limit appears to be an issue.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, first things first, it's had a service for all fluids (2x coolant as it has air/water heat exchangers instead of air/air), new air filters (they were terrible, and one was pinched when installed by NIssan's "technician"). Also, both the boot and bonnet gas struts were shot, so ebay sorted some new ones, the jack handle kept me alive for the first service It needs tyres (more to come on that...) and the brakes are horribly grabby, looks like they've been badly glazed sitting around in Sydney traffic. On the bright side there are no obvious leaks and it runs well. The car goes well with 300kw (stock, claimed, I'll put it on a dyno soon), does good skids and handles reasonably well eg in long medium g corners. It is no cruiser like the Fuga though and is noticeably jiggly on the average (poor) rural road and terrible on corrugated dirt.  I'll get some road/race shocks in it shortly which should help.
    • So, for those following along at home, I've had the R32 up on stands for a while since a minor incident in the last rally, which required a new rear quarter panel to be welded in after the car had been (pretty much) put back square again. The problem is of course, that some R32 GTR stuff is simply not available (eg front guards) and other things are either expensive (second hand) or very expensive (nismo heritage).   In the end I've decided to try out a v37 with some track days, hill climbs etc before going ahead with modifying it for race/rally like the old GTR. To do so I've picked up an ADM Infiniti Q50 Red Sport, rather than a JDM car which offers much better value but might lead to complexities when I discuss spec with the production racing guys. In the meantime it will be my daily (well, more like weekly) driver, mostly highway use to Canberra or Sydney. BTW yes, I did notice it is auto-only, and yes I did know the Z comes with the same motor in manual. Big issue with the Z for me is that it is unlikely I can meet the new rally cage clearance requirements in that chassis so I've gone the 4 door/auto route The colour isn't great for rural lyf, and neither is having a sunroof for racing, but the Q50 market is small and it is what it is. Also...can't say I really like the shape much either, the front is OK but from the rear it is a dead ringer for a mazda 6
    • Ahh yes looks like I’m playing with a new cock on the weekends. Thanks for the information @soviet_merlin I’ll search for it later on and try to get it shipped. Looks like it won’t happen this weekend regardless. But the coolant looks fine so far (no floaties of concern). And waiting another week will slow down my money hole 😂
    • I don't know whether that one should be reused or not. But here's one way to find the part. Go to https://nissan.epc-data.com and use frame number or the menus to drill down to the parts for your specific car. Looks like it is under 'Body parts -> 214 radiator'. See for example the respective part for my Stagea. Looks like it's called drain cock packing, and at least for mine it is part number 2148118000. Searching for that then gives you various places where you can buy it. Amayama can be a bit slow, so it's worth searching around. I'd make sure it's the correct one for yours. At least from amayama it looks pretty generic and fits a ton of cars. And if anyone asks what you did on the weekend, you can tell them that you put a new cock on the car
    • Because people like Gregged stories, I'll elaborate. I ordered a front end, being a GTR conversion front bumper, CF hood, to go with my URAS wider front fenders. These took a good ~year to arrive. They had arrived when I dropped them off at paint shop 1 and are in that large pile of car panels. Unfortunately _some_ of it didn't fit very well/at all, though to be more accurate it's safer to say it didn't fit with each other. A lot of GTR conversion parts, really are just GTR parts. GTR fiber replicas need GTR guards. Because GTR fenders flare out more than GTT fenders. Even GTT fenders that are flared out by the same amount GTR fenders are. The GTR conversion/GTR bumper I was sold is no longer for sale as the company involved recognized the issues with it and refunded it, beyond this situation. The bonnet and bumper gap was... this. They then sent a redesigned bumper, but this still had the issue with the width, and then advised me I needed GTR bracketry to fit this conversion bumper. Which, to me, is kind of crazy - Because if you need a GTR Reo, headlight supports, headlight brackets, and the mounting bracket (with the additional plate with the rubber strip) in order to mount your 'conversion' bumper, the bumper itself is just a GTR bumper. And when I mentioned this, not to mention the time and hassle of sending bumpers back and a forth and dealing with a busy company, I was able to make the statement that this is not made to fit a GTT at all, at least in the sense that you can't use any of it with any other GTT part. The bonnet worked, but without a bumper that can actually fit it was effectively just a GTR bonnet with GTT hinge points and latch points. Not much use if I can't use a bumper. Why would I (or anyone) buy a fibreglass GTR replica that costs more than an OEM plastic GTR bar, if I need to use all the GTR hardware to mount it anyway? Funny enough I had test fitted everything else except these bits. Obviously I should have. I saw pictures of things fitted but everything's not quite the same and unmentioned the fact people have made extra brackets or something to pull on these fibreglass bumpers. With the GTR brackets we were able to force the "second" bumper they sent us, but you shouldn't need two big guys forcing a fibreglass bumper over mounts you need to drill to get it to fit, using a lot of tension and a lot of force, the whole thing was completely taut and felt spring loaded to explode at any moment. In any case after all this faffing about, I eventually spoke to someone else at this company who advised I should have been sent the correct parts to begin with given they pulled up all my communications with what I had, what I wanted, what parts I was using, etc. But by this time the car had been sitting at Shop 1 for quite some time now and they didn't really just want to paint the rest of the car from A pillar back while this was all sorted out. I got a full refund and honestly everyone involved was perfectly nice and easy to deal with once I could get ahold of them, though it did need a bit of 'chasing' as you kinda expect. So then I had a stock front end again, and could have just fit the URAS fibreglass fronts and used an OEM front bumper and OEM hood and called it a day. But did I do that? No, I am retarded. Because I was paranoid about Mr Police in the future sticking a magnet to my front guards, or my bonnet and realising they weren't metal, I followed up on a tip I got from a friend who got his metal guards widened out. I had wanted to do this 'in the future some day' but thought I may as well just do this 'now' given I'd be driving around all paranoid about my fibreglass front fenders on my otherwise legal and engineered car. SO ANYWAY I engaged these people during the time I was returning the original body parts, so the car was at Shop 1 with no front end at all, not being fitted or being painted A pillar back even though I was more than happy to just get the front panels painted separately when they existed. (I understand the reasoning for not wanting this, but I was just trying to save time). And you guessed it, the metalbenders took much longer than they said they would take, and Shop 1 man had a medical issue where he had to close the shop indefinitely (legitimately).  So even though I had to return a bunch of stuff, and a car sat around for months with no work being done on it, there's no actual bad blood there, so I don't want to name names and say "SHOP X SUCKS" just... do your diligence. Metalbender place returned my Bonnet and Guards to me eventually, which was when I realised THIS: Is going to make my life hard again, because having wider metal guards doesn't make much benefit if the actual point it hits is the connection between the bumper and the guard. Which is why Nissan flared it out, ostensibly.   With regards to the bonnet, I needed vents in the first place because the car likes to overheat due to heat soak on 40C days with the aircon on, if the car has been driven for more than like 30 minutes. Only with the aircon on, only on days that hot, only when sitting, and only after ~30 minutes. So the logic behind it all was to cut vents in. I had originally thought to just the flat pieces out (not the webbing!) and put mesh in there, which would have worked fine. Then talking to the metalbenders I was convinced this was a bit agricultural and water would get in. STUPID EVERYONE INVOLVED didn't think of simply using a plastic engine cover on the engine, and we started talking about vent design and rain gutters instead. There was also the issue of while the guards both fit what I asked for, which was: "Can you replicate these URAS Fibreglass flares on these stock metal guards by the same distance, or maybe +10mm wider?" ..the issue was the guards weren't the same as one another when the job was done. Enough that when I fit them and went to paint places, the overriding feeling was "I can't get it painted while they're like that". So, I Karen'ed and they offered to fix them up to get them symmetrical again after I drove back and showed them, and we did the whole lean back from a few meters in front of the car, and: "Oh yeah" "ahhh yeah".. "Ahh, ... yeah, yeah nah yeah" ... and I then took them off and delivered them. I have it all back now, and while the guards are better they're still not symmetrical, and I'm paranoid about a tiny bit of webbing actually being cut with the vents installed, and only slightly remorseful about the fact that METALBENDING WAS REALLY EXPENSIVE, and it would have been cheaper to simply buy all of the Nissan OEM pieces, including $2200 aluminium bonnets, and $2000 guard sets and OEM plastic bumpers and get it done that way. YOU ARE WARNED. also, anyone wanna buy my GTR brackets between the headlights? Useful for someone doing this conversion and they cost about $1000 cause you didn't want to use/mark up/damage the fibreglass replica the company sold you to make their stuff fit (it won't fit).
×
×
  • Create New...