Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, GTR_JOEY said:

Yea but I wanted to see how responsive I could get it, would have destroyed most twins ???

How soon will the EFR be going on? Next weekend? :D. You'll have to plumb those gates in but that won't be hard.

  • Like 1

So does anyone know a 7670 result out there that makes it a no brainer decision? I have spent this morning again cruising google and can only find one old article which supports what i was saying about the SR20 comparison.

http://blog.perrinperformance.com/borg-warner-efr7670-turbo-exposed-and-tuned-part-2/

I did see some good results on a std EVO X ... i think i am going to stick with what i got :(

Just now, Roy said:

So does anyone know a 7670 result out there that makes it a no brainer decision? I have spent this morning again cruising google and can only find one old article which supports what i was saying about the SR20 comparison.

http://blog.perrinperformance.com/borg-warner-efr7670-turbo-exposed-and-tuned-part-2/

I did see some good results on a std EVO X ... i think i am going to stick with what i got :(

Have you have a good read through the EFR thread on EvoM? That thread is a wealth of information.

Yeh, there are some Evo 8 thru 10 results that tempt me..but bascally its 3076 response and power with  better transient response.  Which is ....wishy washy stuff. Tempted to just go 7163 and give it a gut full and at least habe it all in...but that is wooftah 427ci cave man stuff. Its a turbo car....it shoudl be about soaring top end :)

I went from a HTA3076 to a 7670 on my RB25. Dyno graph in this thread somewhere of initial tune. Picked up power everywhere, much better car for the change. Approx 75hp gain (top end, now) since final tune with minimal loss down low. 

6boost, 1.05ts. I have since added heavier waste gate springs and picked up another 30hp and had a slight improvement in response. Next job will be to replace the cooler piping as it goes from 2.5 turbo exit to 4 back to 3 for cooler then exits as 3 straight into 4 upto inlet manifold. It's not ideal.

10 hours ago, Piggaz said:

How soon will the EFR be going on? Next weekend? :D. You'll have to plumb those gates in but that won't be hard.

Steady up lol, I'm not even back yet, 

hopefully not not too much goes wrong and I can have in bolted together and ready to go in a couple of weeks.

already spoke to Dennis, gates are getting plumbed in ?

43 minutes ago, GTR_JOEY said:

Steady up lol, I'm not even back yet, 

hopefully not not too much goes wrong and I can have in bolted together and ready to go in a couple of weeks.

already spoke to Dennis, gates are getting plumbed in ?

Excellent!

just don't go pushing aside a white 33. Haha

  • Like 1

Where are you getting this info Roy lol? A 7670 will punch holes in a GTX & GT3076! 

Ive never heard of an GT's going 410kw?350-360kw max. Yeah the GTX will blow 400kw but its ALOT laggier! 

 

Whats this its "only transient and response" its better? Transient response on the track and on the street is king! 

 

SAU is being a turd. If it lets me i will load a GTX3076 vs 7670 result for you. 

Both are T3 .82/.83 results on an evo.

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Uniclutch install vid, RB Track edition.   Highlight reel is very drive able, not noisy but still heavy with the clutch master he has.      
    • And....if that could be true for all R34 GTTs, then it might be good. But in reality it is not really any better than my standard instruction to "go out and have a look at it yourself, and wave a tape measure around" etc etc, because as soon as you have any adjustable arms, or coilovers with smaller diameter springs, or tyres that have any bulge that goes out further than the rim, etc etc, then the simple version of the information is still potentially misleading. Plus, nothing in this is static. Everything is moving. At the rear the wheels swing inward at the top as they go up, so the clearances on the inside change as the suspension is compressed. At the front it's even worse. And then you have the difference in absolute wheel position in the arch can move around more, or less, depending on how compliant the bushes are. If, like me, you have sphericals on the front caster rods (and on the FUCAs also, but these are probably less dominant when it comes to wheel position), then your wheel will swing forward/backward under loads, as well as up/down, as well as steering angle. You end up having the simple numbers with 17 caveats/footnotes for each.
    • Both windows operate normally while the engine is running but start to sag as soon as I switch off.  Does anyone know of reasonably priced replacements or other brands that will fit?
    • Actually PowerFC is probably the easiest to get basic data from, it comes with a hand controller and display so you don't need to remember to pack a laptop every time you drive. It also has a PC based viewing/logging option if required. Nissan used consult on these because back in the mid 80s, ODB was just a glint in a standard's body's eyes.  They switched to OBD shape around 2000 (my 2001 Cima had OBD shaped but not OBD compliant port) With the standard ECU there is a cable and software available to give basic data too, I think it is called Nissan Data Scan or s
×
×
  • Create New...