Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, bigmikespec said:

For the record, compressor RPM and pressure are not related... at all. 

Was looking for a loose estimation on how hard a 26 would spin it In relation to boost.

but yea thanks 

4 hours ago, Piggaz said:

7F40E034-348A-4E8D-A9D9-00AE447141F2_zps

R32, 6 boost high mount, 8374 IWG.

And the aircon used?

Genuinely curious, out of interest, for the sake of anyone who may wonder themselves in the future. Can't see the factory aircon line where they should be running under the compressor housing though, I think, but i think i see aircon lines wrapped in foil up at the firewall?

19 minutes ago, sneakey pete said:

And the aircon used?

Genuinely curious, out of interest, for the sake of anyone who may wonder themselves in the future. Can't see the factory aircon line where they should be running under the compressor housing though, I think, but i think i see aircon lines wrapped in foil up at the firewall?

I believe so. Waiting on a call back from the owner of the car. 

Why don't you ring 6 boob and ask? Bugger making a manifold when you don't have to. FWIW, I've never heard of the issue you're talking about. R32/full race with the PS pump yeah, not AC with a 6 boost.

If that's the case that's good.
I had been onto Kyle via email and did ask him if there were fitment issues re aircon at which point I didn't receive a reply, however by that stage i'd got onto my mate about doing it, and he was competitive on price and willing to have a got at the low mount, so I didn't bother following up more on the 6boost. I was going to far to say it wont fit, i've read too much into the fact I didn't get a reply when I specifically asked about that. Either way the car is in the fab shed with a set of flanges and elbows so we'll see what comes out

I have 6 boost on 8374 iwg .92 efr with r32 AC on my car right now. I did make a new AC line because I had cut mine previously trying to get it to fit with the RAW brokerage manifold. The dampener in line would have been close to the bottom of the manifold for sure on the stock line. I cut the ends and just had my shop sweat 2' of line in-between the end fittings and covered with heat wrap. Works perfect

 

Warranty issues is why no heat wrap is present. Thought about doing it anyway but it seems to work well enough.

Zero hood clearance issues (that was the problem with the RAW). Remember the 9180 is the same size as the 8374...so there's room enough for a 1,000HP turbo on here.



Ran some more boost threshold tests: Temp = 91 F, 70% humidity.

1) Third gear from 2k rpms. Graph attached - NOTE that my closed loop boost control is starting to compensate at 3390 rpms (ie starting to give supply pressure to the wastegate).

  • 10 psi @ 3430 rpms
  • 14 psi @ 3712 rpms
  • 16.5 psi @ 3909 rpms

2) 5th gear from 2k rpms. Graph attached.

  • 10 psi @ 3059 rpms
  • 14 psi @ 3200 rpms
  • 16.5 psi @ 3278 rpms
  • 18.1 psi @ 3329 rpms

So this goes to show that the EFR will spool soon when loaded for long amounts of time, but that it still has a good bit of inertia with it to get it to respond on extreme low end. As stated previously with my setup, the gear greatly affects threshold. Granted, it's still hyper responsive and the low boost threshold in 5th is nice for passing on the highways because I'm still at those rpms while cruising so there is no need for downshifting.

boost threshold 3rd gear.JPG

boost threshold 5th gear.JPG

  • Like 4
HarrisRacing

Amazing spool :O

Its 2.75l? Stock head with cams? And on fuel pump?


BC 79mm stroker crank. Stock 86mm bores. Forged pistons stock compression. Squish pads mostly removed. Tomei poncam A's at 0 and 0 cam settings. 6 boost manifold divided T4 internal wastegate 8374 .92 housing hypertune V2 intake manifold and yes 93 octane fuel in the US
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...