Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nice info from the tuner. it really does look like a gun set-up.

Yeah good to see someone giving some extra information!

The power at 4000rpm is very impressive :)

I'm assuming the "old set up" is a stock 2.0L motor with a GT30ish sized turbo

The tuner posts some very nice and detailed info, that's great.

And wow, better power AND response than previous setup, agreed with SimonR32, looks like it was GT30-based. Win-win.

And it loses nothing to factory 4B11.

i want one now.

Even at 18psi it's an animal to make so much power as early as it does.

I wonder how an rb25 would go trying to spool it....

I would expect peak torque to be a little higher in the rev range but the transient area to be a little better to compensate (think linear inline 6 effect).

Now I want to see a 7064 on an SR, might just have to get one LOL

yeah I wonder how a 7670 would run at 30psi on my Jun RB27? but given how responsive the 9180 was on berrys RB30 I was thinking 8374 for me but if the 7670 can make the power I want (380-400kw atw) then why not use it? I'm still not convinced it's a genuine 600hp/400kw @ 30psi at the treads turbo though but if it is then it's bloody awesome.

Beer Baron - Depends on the dyno you're reading at the treads at, some rolling roads (ie, Dynojets) often read the same if not higher than Dynapacks... depending on the setups of course. This is ~470kw @ hubs, I'd say if this is a genuine reading, then I'd think 380-400kw on a DD should be realistic.

I can't believe how boost thirsty these things are....Hope my engines up to the task :wacko:

Its the EVO that needs that boost to make that power, though I'd still have gone the 9180 for an RB30 personally :thumbsup:

yeah I wonder how a 7670 would run at 30psi on my Jun RB27? but given how responsive the 9180 was on berrys RB30 I was thinking 8374 for me but if the 7670 can make the power I want (380-400kw atw) then why not use it? I'm still not convinced it's a genuine 600hp/400kw @ 30psi at the treads turbo though but if it is then it's bloody awesome.

My "410kw" on the same hub dyno with the same correction (SAE) went 360rwkw on a Dyno Dynamics roller...

So I would imagine the 30psi E85 run would be around the 400-420rwkw

Its the width of the compressor map that inspires me to say that more than the outright power numbers - will be interesting to see what kind of power the EFR8374 lets through when not pumping 2+bar through it.

Thanks, but I'm well aware that you've previously posted those results, not really any need for name calling, most of us are adults here.

Maybe on the dynos you use there is a 70kw difference.

  • Location:Perth.

Thanks, but I'm well aware that you've previously posted those results, not really any need for name calling, most of us are adults here.

Maybe on the dynos you use there is a 70kw difference.

  • Location:Perth.

I didn't call you a name?

The dynos I "use" is the same dyno with the same correction as the result of the Borg Warner EFR on the last page (so a viable comparison)... It's also the same dyno that STATUS (not from Perth) uses. (battery, with almost an identical set up to mine makes almost exactly the same power as mine on the STATUS dyno as mine does on the Allstar dyno)

It's also worth noting that we know the hub dyno reads higher than a roller, which is why we usually leave correction off. With correction turned off it's still 30kw difference between the hubber and the roller! The 2 runs were also on the same tank of fuel with about 50km of driving between the 2 dynos...

Also in regards to the shot at high reading dynos in Perth, good one... Original, pitty the mph does not lie!

Thanks, but I'm well aware that you've previously posted those results, not really any need for name calling, most of us are adults here.

Maybe on the dynos you use there is a 70kw difference.

  • Location:Perth.

Now you just sound incredibly ignorant.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @joshuaho96 Hmm considering the drama you've seen/experienced, have you looked into getting a built complete long motor shipped from Australia?  Considering the AUD is basically monopoly money when compared to the USD, at a glance this seems like a good option?
    • Bloody Skylines, they put you through the bloody wringer! Stick at it! Stunning drag strip BTW! Where is it? Can see part of the name on the slip and probably should just Google it!
    • I mean the other day I had to walk someone through diagnosing why their timing belt was walking off the cam gears. At least one of the issues was a bent tensioner stud. Local mechanics have found runout on the CAS mechanism causing weird failures. I'm also no saint here I've documented some of the things I've had to learn the hard way. Something I discovered recently is that my CA emissions catalytic converters weren't even welded correctly to align the downpipe to the main cat and they tossed the support bracket that goes from the transfer case to the downpipe to support everything there. I spend a lot of time chasing down these decidedly unsexy problems and the net effect is it feels like I never actually get to the original objective (flex fuel, VCAM, oil control, cooling, etc).
    • At times with how you make everything sound, all I imagine Americans doing when they see a gtr is standing there looking at it and bashing it with a gun like how a caveman would with a club and hoping it fixes itself 
    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
×
×
  • Create New...