Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

correct - XS Engineering shut down many years ago. However, Blackmarket Racing aka 'BMR' is located directly behind Full-Race... and they bought the dynamic testing dyno from XS. BMR had wanted to get it from XS for many years becuase it has some special features (such as extremely accurate measurement of drivetrain losses) however when we dynoed the evo i accidentally brought up the old template with the xs logo.

edit: i know the chart says "engine" on the screen but I assure you this is whp. the point i was trying to make was that a turbo thats larger than gt35R is spooling like a gt30R... and making more than 35R power

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

Ah gotcha. That's very impressive!

As for cobraa's comment:

"My other comment would be great if you could make a complete kit instead of a kit that need more modification and fabrication"

That would be cool indeed but then the already "expensive kit" could go up another $500-1500 (depending if you meant intake pipes, filters and hoses/fittings)

And as full race has already said at some point, there are already plenty of good downpipea and what not out there so they focused on the required parts that weren't available, or something like that

  • Like 1

I got lazy right at the end and didn't mix up fuel with ethanol and got it tuned on 98RON despite having 9.5:1 compression ratio. It couldn't really take any decent timing numbers at all. Still makes full boost at around 3200 and makes 258rwkw. Dyno printout is at home so will upload a pic tonight. Printout is in km/h rather than rpm at the moment so just trying to decypher it at the moment. I reallyneed to put a softer wastegate spring in it and lower the boost a bit to get a bit more timing into it imo.

hey brad - did you post this dyno chart in the thread? I just looked for it but could not find it. Would love to see the torque curve, with full boost at 3200

The dyno run with a fairly quick ramp rate did not represent the on-road boost threshold. It showed full boost at around 3800 on the dyno.

I'm now running my E30 mix and have added 2psi of boost across the board and around 6 degrees more timing in most of the full load cells with no sign of knock. I didn't push it any further but I plan to get it in to the tuner in a month or so see if has any more headroom and get a good dyno printout with RPM and at a slow ramp rate.

Been waiting for this kind of thing to start filtering through - a twin scroll EFR9180 on a 2.2litre EVO X:

Mods:

2008 Evo X GSR
Fuel: 93 Octane + Meth
Mods: Moore Automotive Built 2.2L (Manley 94mm Stroker Kit with Turbo Tuff Rods and ACL Bearings)
AMS TMP Cams
Kelford Valve Springs
Ferrea Intake Valves
SuperTech Inconel Exhaust Valves
Cosworth 1.3mm HeadGasket
ARP 625+ Head Studs
JDL built T4 Twin-Scroll Turbo Manifold
Borg Warner EFR9180 (T4 TS) Turbo
Tial MV-S Wastegates (open dump)
Moore Automotive Custom 3.5" Turbo-back Exhaust and Dump Tubes
Moore Automotive 3.5" Intake, 2.5" UICP, 2.75" LICP
ETS 4" Intercooler
ID1300 Injectors
Walbro 400 Fuel Pump
Moore Automotive modified Fuel Pump Housing with -6AN outlet
-6AN Fuel Feed Line
AMS Fuel Rail
MAP FPR Kit with FuelLab Regulator
Snow Performance Direct Port Meth Injection Kit
Exedy Triple Disc Clutch
Jack's Built Transmission
STOCK Sleeves, Head, Intake Manifold, and Throttle Body

C_Hoover_Moore_Evo_X_GSR_22L_EFR9180_Dyn

Apparently was running out of fuel system - he reckons he needs to (and may?) upgrade the fuel system to get more out of it, definitely didn't reach the limit of the flow of the 9180. 25psi by just after 25psi for a 94lb/min turbo on a 2.2litre is offensively good. Its just dirty... basically this is better than PT6466 spool and better than PT6766 flow, for those who are obsessed with Precision turbos.

Guessing there is supporsed to be a rpm number here.

Apparently was running out of fuel system - he reckons he needs to (and may?) upgrade the fuel system to get more out of it, definitely didn't reach the limit of the flow of the 9180. 25psi by just after 25psi for a 94lb/min turbo on a 2.2litre is offensively good. Its just dirty... basically this is better than PT6466 spool and better than PT6766 flow, for those who are obsessed with Precision turbos.

yea lith - this EvoX is the daily driver for the owner of MooreTuning. He started with EFR7670 1.05 a/r and then switched to the EFR9180 1.05 a/r. Really nice guys, I met them in the BorgWarner booth at PRI and spoken a few times over the last 4 years. Typically they sell a lot of precision and FP turbos so he was interested in the EFR but like everyone else was a little skeptical. now he has a decent opinion on them, keeps calling it magical :stupid:

  • Like 1

yea lith - this EvoX is the daily driver for the owner of MooreTuning. He started with EFR7670 1.05 a/r and then switched to the EFR9180 1.05 a/r. Really nice guys, I met them in the BorgWarner booth at PRI and spoken a few times over the last 4 years. Typically they sell a lot of precision and FP turbos so he was interested in the EFR but like everyone else was a little skeptical. now he has a decent opinion on them, keeps calling it magical :stupid:

I like !

So can I/we expect the result on this 7670 to be better since we have 2.6 instead of 2.2. I know nothing about evos and don't know if they can compare, somehow, to rbs.

EVOs tend to drive turbos better cc for cc.... unfortunately

You can't beat a square engine :)

Hence why I would love to see a well equipped NEO dirty 30. I may just have to build one ;)

Also the 4B11T is a more modern engine than a 4G63T or an RB six . More modern head designs inc chamber and port cooling and variable cam timing both sides .

Brad I'd like to hear more about your E30 experiences maybe in one of the ethanol/E85 threads .

Cheers A .

You can't beat a square engine :)

Hence why I would love to see a well equipped NEO dirty 30. I may just have to build one ;)

Yes I like that idea too though engines like BDAs and FJ20s were a bit more than square . If Nissan really intended the RB30 to be a true high performance engine it could have used the bore and stroke of the VG30 which I think is 87 x 83 . Sadly V6s package better than straight ones so RBs died a quick death . BMW kept them alive for a time but eventually went to the dark side with a V8 I believe in M3s .

A .

If Nissan really intended the RB30 to be a true high performance engine it could have used the bore and stroke of the VG30 which I think is 87 x 83

How do you figure this? Many of the best performance engines are square, or very close to it. Check out SR20DET, K20A, 2JZGTE, 4G63 etc... I would take any of those over any of the options on the other list

  • Like 1

You can't beat a square engine :)

Hence why I would love to see a well equipped NEO dirty 30. I may just have to build one ;)

I've got a neo 30 on a slow build, which I'll probably go with the EFR 8374, won't be ready till next year though :(

  • Like 1

So can I/we expect the result on this 7670 to be better since we have 2.6 instead of 2.2. I know nothing about evos and don't know if they can compare, somehow, to rbs.

a larger displacement engine will usually spool faster. the 7670 is a great turbo, but a bit small for an RB26 if you plan to build it. The 8374 is a better match in my opinion. We have an rb25 pro drift competitor who runs the 7670 (because he wanted a bit quicker response for his small local track) but i expect he will have an 8374 on there soon for the big tracks:

Hence why I would love to see a well equipped NEO dirty 30. I may just have to build one ;)

what is a NEO dirty 30?

BMW kept them alive for a time but eventually went to the dark side with a V8 I believe in M3s .

A .

adrian normally i agree with you, but you must be drinking tonite. :cheers: BMW produces far more turbocharged Inline motors than V motors...

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

what is a NEO dirty 30?

An RB30DET sporting an R34 RB25DET NEO cylinder head.

You get improved combusion chamber and port design, along with VCT and solid lifters.

A pair of drop in cams will make for a formidable budget alternative to a high performance head.

How do you figure this? Many of the best performance engines are square, or very close to it. Check out SR20DET, K20A, 2JZGTE, 4G63 etc... I would take any of those over any of the options on the other list

How do you figure this? Many of the best performance engines are square, or very close to it. Check out SR20DET, K20A, 2JZGTE, 4G63 etc... I would take any of those over any of the options on the other list

Well Lith I guess it depends on your definition of best performance engines . Generally the highest horsepower comes at revs and under square engines often are not top end screamers .

The greatest limitation power wise for a square or under square engine is the lack of valve , mainly inlet , valve area . There comes a time when the cylinder bores limit valve size you can physically fit in the chambers . You mention SR20s and they are an interesting case in point . These were developed to be an east west as well as a north south engine so packaging compromises in east west form limited the blocks length as well as the bore centres . It was not really intended to be a competition engine even though Nissan had half a go with the Pulsar GTiR version , which ended up being an epic failure as a competition car - won jack shit . The only serious engine was the Super Tourer Primera one and it was so far removed from a production SR20 as to be unrecognisable . They basically had the 89 x 80 bore stroke of the FJ20 as well as turning the head around and then driving the cams from the opposite end . The block and head castings may have started out as SR20 but in the end there was SFA Nissan about it .

I'm not so sure Toyota went road racing with the 2JZGTE and even if you could stop the Supras body flex the manifolds are RS on 2Js .

The reason I mentioned the old Cosworth BDA was because it used a big bore compared to stroke bottom end and the head worked very well in its day . A real race twin cam head is quite tall because the included angle between the inlet and exhaust valves is narrow to keep the valves out of the pistons and also to house steeply downdraught inlet ports . A tall head needs a not too tall block to fit in a production car and that works out best with a big bore and a short stroke otherwise the complete engine gets too tall . Same story with Nissans Formula Pacific based LZ twin cam engines in the "L14" blocks . These were actually L18 blocks with short stroke cranks in them and hanging 10000 revs off them was nothing .

Off the top of my head there is no square RBs though 30s from memory are closest at 86 x 85 - from memory . They get a leg up from having quite long rods too .

Now to a theoretical RB30 based on VG30 dimensions . Larger bore could have supported larger valves and depending on rod length the block may not have needed to be as tall as an RB30 so a little easier to package in twin cam form . We'll never know .

The one non standard RB variant , RB24 , really shows the shortcomings of lack of bore diameter . Compared to an RB25 a 24 lacks valve and port area and there's SFA you can do about it . Compare the bores and strokes though neither is square .

4G63s are an old design now and in competition use (FIA Group A) they never busted 5500 revs with turbo restrictors on them . You can probably argue that a slightly undersquare engine may make slightly better torque (low to mid range) when it is rev limited - doesn't rev high enough for valve area to be a problem . Also rod and piston inertia not a real biggie provided they can withstand the high boost almost diesel like characteristics .

Sorry Geoff must have been thinking of the NA I6s .

Edited by discopotato03
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Your off site links didn't work for me, and in any case it is easier for forum members if you post the pic directly either as an attachment or a link so the information is all in one place. That aside, the sills are the correct place to lift the car, whether with the factory jack or a hoist. Yes you should use rubber blocks with a slit for the seam on a hoist to avoid bending the pinch weld (where yours is currently bent, just bend it back if possible eg vicegrips), and be aware of the height you need in the blocks to clear any sill extensions to the hoist arms as it lifts If what you are doing needs access to the sills, the rear subframe bush would also be strong and secure. I'm not sure what you mean by sidemember (maybe same part I mean by sills) but be careful that your front support point is not too far back as the car is very front heavy and could overbalance.
    • Here's my first iteration - white duct tape so color is off, but this is just a straight line across the bonnet lip. From a geometry standpoint, this is probably closest to what a GTR has. Next up is some $5 white pearl vinyl and some rubber door sill trim, applied to the BACK of the bonnet lip. It's more accurate placement to the GTR, but also follows the body lines on this setup a bit more. Couple more pics on this config incoming: Again, a $5 vinyl and rubber job, it's  POC still and not how I'm gonna run this part. But one thing I'll note is that the black trim does need to "straighten out" a bit, and instead of going completely along the line of the bonnet lip, might be better suited to wrap over the "horns" of the bonnet lip, giving it a less aggressive curve up at the ends.  The correct way to do this would be to paint it body-matched and then decide how you want to make the black line. If you used paint or a pinstripe, you could have the black line go straight to the corner of the headlight where the rubber strip typically meets the headlight on a GTR.   Hope this helps!
    • I know this is a super old topic, but what ended up being the problem?
    • I know this is an old thread but I have a particular attachment to the ENR34, so I don't think additional content hurts. For starters, I agree with everyone here in that the performance of a stock R34 GTR is a pretty low bar and one that you're going to spend a lot of money "matching". Now if you're willing to deviate from that template as your goal, you'll be much better off and enjoy the car much more. The engine in the NA R34s is a real kick in the nuts in terms of upgradability compared to previous generation NA cars. The NA heads on the RB2X NEOs have MUCH smaller intake port cross sections and are not compatible with any of the aftermarket forward-facing manifolds available for the RB25DET. This can be remedied with a RB25DET NEO head, but those are expensive relative to what they are. A full long-block from a turbo AWD Stagea is generally a better value and will run you about $4000 USD to get it to you. This will get you the stronger RB26DETT rods, as well. That would give you a base to build off of to be safe in the 400whp range. Not shooting for the moon, but if the stock R34 was your bar, this engine would buy you enough to be just North of stock GTR power. A forward facing manifold would allow for the easiest method toward using Bosch EV14 format injectors such as those from Injector Dynamics and FIC, to name a couple. People hate them because they're copies, but Greddy fakes can be had for around $300 USD. With what the fuel rail, regulator, injectors, and the rail adds, figure $2000 USD for the whole setup including the manifold. With the OEM brackets and a bit of trimming to the ends of the lower frame rails, the OEM intercooler mounting brackets can be used to mount an OEM GTR intercooler, or an aftermarket one made for a GTR. Those are handy vs a universale due to the angles that the end tanks have on them. Then your plumbing become super straightforward at that point despite having to cut a hole where the battery is an a matching one on the other side for the pipes. Battery can go to the trunk. I'd round up to a healthy $2000 USD here too (maybe even a tiny more) to allow for a nice aftermarket unit and some pipe fabrication. Or if you can find someone that's upgrading to something larger, the used market comes in clutch here for a decent savings. I won't even get into turbo sizing as that's something that would be for yourself to determine. HOWEVER, for the purposes of your stated goals, a Borg Warner 7064 with an internal wastegate would be a perfect spooler and would make stock GTR power easily. It would also bolt up to your OEM manifold (that would come with the DET you purchased a couple steps above) if it were ordered with a T3 flange. More with adequate fuel. If you can stick with the OEM exhaust manifold then expect to be in the whole about $6000 USD for decent turbo like the one suggested, a down pipe, new O2, and full exhaust to mate up, and upgrades to the integrated BOV in an EFR or a standalone BOV for a different turbo, as well as an aftermarket IWG (internal waste gate). Those last two are definitely optional and unnecessary. All of this stuff above does you no good without any way of tuning and or monitoring the engine. Bite the bullet on a standalone engine management solution. If your experience with wiring is limited, you're going to have to hand it off to someone else, though. Unfortunately, the adapter/patch harnesses available are typically made around the GTT which does not include AWD, and the GTR, which integrates into a lot of chassis features that aren't present in your wiring interface. So the ENR34 is the oddball. So you'll want to expand a bit on your selection and find an ECU that's capable of running the ATTESA pump also. I have a Link Thunder, but you don't need quite that much ECU to accommodate that. You WILL need someone with the know-how to tune it and code those features into whatever software it uses. And to wire it up. This will be your most significant expense. Call it $6000 USD with an ECU, an okay wiring job (no motorsport grade at this price), aftermarket triggers and R35 coils, and the time it takes to tune the ECU with added features (electronic boost control solenoid, MAP, IAT, the new triggers, and ATTESA) and don't be surprised if it's more if you want better work done. Grab a clutch made for any RB pull transmission R32/R33GTR made for the power handling capacity you're looking for. Budget $1500 USD for a new good one. That's about $20,000 USD for an engine you've upgraded yourself and had wired and tuned by someone else. That's no brakes (ENR34 brakes are pathetic), suspension (again, pathetic), or wheels and tires. So you're pretty spot on in terms of spending $30,000 USD extra on the car just to get it to perform a little better than a stock R34 GTR while looking like a bone stock ENR34 with some wheels and suspension mods. That doesn't include fluids, maintenance items, gaskets/seals, repairs needed or anything else discovered along the way. But you'll have a car you can take to the track and have fun without worrying as much about nicks and dings.  
    • Okay so, please read this. car started and ran fine. got my tuned ecu by RSenthalpy, did a bunch of pulls to test it out and finally drive the car after half a year of it just sitting and idling at most. Everything was good, thing ran flawlessly and had so much power, didn't feel slower than a Prius anymore. Parked it back and turned it off.  Next day, I install an AFR and start the car. Didn't wire anything to the ecu. Just gauge.  Car started, but died out in about a minute. I figured it was cause my car was on a lift and the fuel was really low and old. I add 5 gallons of fuel, still cranks but no start. I remove all AFR wiring (tapped into double din acc and power wires but there was a nest of wiring there so I was worried I messed something up. tried to put it back to how it was prior to afr install.) Still cranks no start. Changed spark plugs with brand new ones Changed fuel pump with a new one (verified working) Did compression test , compression came back all at 150ish. All fuses are good, Relay seemed good but ill double check by switching similar relays around. Verified MAF is working - Ended up getting curious as to why fuel pump is not priming when ignition is on, so I cut the fuel pump ground and power and connected them directly to a portable jumper. I also disconnected fuel line to fuel rail to verify fuel is being sent. So with direct jumper power, the fuel pump turns on and shot gas everywhere through the fuel pipe that I had disconnected, so ny doing that, I verified no clogs in fuel lines or filter. - Tried starting the car with that jumper directly wired to power and ground, but car still did not start. I'm guessing its a CAS issue but im a little scared to check it without messing up timing or anything else since I actually dont understand how to check CAS lol. If anyone has any other suggestions or recommendations , please let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...