Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just an update on the GCG hiflow with OP6 rear housing

I had to get a boost leak sorted (repositioned cooler piping and tightened a hose clamp), base timing reset to 15 (mechanic didn't do this properly when i got a major service) and ECU tuned by Toshi, who did a great job!

OP6 GCG hiflow wasn't as laggy as I thought it was, it was surprisingly linear, less lag than GT2540, you can see positive pressure from just over 2000rpm and full 17psi from 4000rpm

it doesn't have the midrange rush like the R33 GCG high flow, but provided a very linear delivery with strong top end, which i think is great for track, whereas the r33 GCG hiflow will be good for street.

don't know what the max power figure is though, as the tune is done on the road, one thing Toshi did mention is that he thinks it drives simillar to hypergear OP6 highflow

for the price of $2000 new, complete bolt on ball bearing unit, i think it is good value for money

Edited by chiksluvit
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Question , is a 96 build GTS25T with a genuine 91K a rare beast nowdays ?

I have a 96 GTS25T with 95k :)

I also have a GTRS turbo. I make 252rwkw @ 15psi. There's probably more in it, but as my tuner said, the power was 'there' without leaning on the motor too hard so why push my luck!

As for how it drives on the street, its kind of deceptive.. sometimes it doesn't 'feel' like you are going fast, but looking at the speedo its obvious that it isnt true. Also, I can't speak for anyone else's car, but I have pretty good tyres and unless its provoked my car just digs in, grips and rips through 1st and 2nd.

EDIT: Forgot to add, that my car passed over the pits with a GT-RS 8)

Edited by SoFreshSoClean
  • 2 weeks later...

went for a drive with andymoocow today, and i must say that the GTRS' response is noticeably better than the OP6 hiflow

both turbos are quite linear, yet GTRS feels like it has a fatter torque curve throughout the rev range

the OP6 GCG has that second of lag on downshift acceleration, with GTRS, this is almost unnoticeable.

my boost is limited to 16psi with AVCR and still standard actuator, whereas andymoocow's GTRS is running 18 psi, this may affect the overall performance. But overall you get what you pay for.

was good fun going for a spin in your car too mate, good to feel the old GCG again, ahhh good memories :D

I do love the GT-RS turbo still, and will most likely bolt another one on when this one comes to the end of its life. Sure there are PLENTY of other turbos out there with more power, but response is what i love when driving sydney roads, which are almost all 50km/hr near me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Um.... This is not easy. I will have a fiddle with it, but make no promises. I think, given the explicit resistances vs temperature, and your ECU measured voltages, it should be possible to match them up. I will do that by assuming a 5V supply from ECU to sensor, find out how much current would have to flow to produce that voltage, then use that current as a .... nah f**k. That won't work. The supply voltage is fixed, but there's nothing to say that the ECU regulates the current too. Um... I dunno. I guess there's a voltage divider setup in the ECU. As in, there's another resistance between the ECU's sense terminal and ground. That way, as the sensor resistance changes, that's how they get a floating voltage that varies with the temperature, without having to control the current. Give me a minute or 3.
    • *that* is a question for chatgpt (or someone that understands maths....but I'd try chatty). Drop them the table and ask for the formula
    • Alright. Exhaust has been looked at, and booked in 'soon'. I'm not 100% convinced it's going to be as good as possible but I'm going to go with it anyway. If I get a reasonable thing that works for 10 years I mean that's twice as long as I've lived with the current one. I have a more pressing issue. I have fixed my MPVI3 (by buying a new one). Excellently, one can wire in analog 0-5v inputs to the ECU itself. I had wideband already via Serial so I also wired it in via the direct input. The idea being I can use the standalone logging without a laptop and have Wideband data in it. The other wire I thought I'd use oil temp. This is where I've gone crazy. HPTuners requires you to implement a formula so you know how much volts = how much temp. This seems relatively simple to me. However I cannot find the scale for this anywhere on the internet, nor decipher how to figure it out without removing the sensor from the car. All I know is that voltage actually goes up as temperature goes down. I am using the actual gauge, so I can see what the temp is. The signal wire has been branched off into the MPVI3. EXAMPLE: 2.68v = 58C 2.7 = 57C 2.74v = 56C 2.8V = 54C 3.06V = 49C 3.18V = 47C 3.37V = 43C I think the gauge is 50-150C. It may be more. It may be less, because I can't find it for the love of f**k. It appears all the information about the gauges I have has been scoured from the internet, but the sender is VDO 320.021 I believe the resistance chart is this How the f**k do I convert this to a voltage? Once I have a voltage... I then have to perform this transform of said voltage to show it in the scanner: https://www.hptuners.com/help/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm @GTSBoy you're probably my only hope here TEST YOUR MIGHT
    • Here’s the updated and installed muse replica nismo ones … very happy with the outcome. Eventhough I painted my whole rear end due to my rich idle lol. 
    • Hmm. I had a good look (w/o searching, because I'm not logging in) and couldn't see it either. I distinctly recall the thread, not many weeks ago. It must have been removed or perhaps put into the back section. If it was in Off Topic you should at least have been able to search it up. So if I'm not hallucinating, it is fairly decently removed.
×
×
  • Create New...