Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just an update on the GCG hiflow with OP6 rear housing

I had to get a boost leak sorted (repositioned cooler piping and tightened a hose clamp), base timing reset to 15 (mechanic didn't do this properly when i got a major service) and ECU tuned by Toshi, who did a great job!

OP6 GCG hiflow wasn't as laggy as I thought it was, it was surprisingly linear, less lag than GT2540, you can see positive pressure from just over 2000rpm and full 17psi from 4000rpm

it doesn't have the midrange rush like the R33 GCG high flow, but provided a very linear delivery with strong top end, which i think is great for track, whereas the r33 GCG hiflow will be good for street.

don't know what the max power figure is though, as the tune is done on the road, one thing Toshi did mention is that he thinks it drives simillar to hypergear OP6 highflow

for the price of $2000 new, complete bolt on ball bearing unit, i think it is good value for money

Edited by chiksluvit
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Question , is a 96 build GTS25T with a genuine 91K a rare beast nowdays ?

I have a 96 GTS25T with 95k :)

I also have a GTRS turbo. I make 252rwkw @ 15psi. There's probably more in it, but as my tuner said, the power was 'there' without leaning on the motor too hard so why push my luck!

As for how it drives on the street, its kind of deceptive.. sometimes it doesn't 'feel' like you are going fast, but looking at the speedo its obvious that it isnt true. Also, I can't speak for anyone else's car, but I have pretty good tyres and unless its provoked my car just digs in, grips and rips through 1st and 2nd.

EDIT: Forgot to add, that my car passed over the pits with a GT-RS 8)

Edited by SoFreshSoClean
  • 2 weeks later...

went for a drive with andymoocow today, and i must say that the GTRS' response is noticeably better than the OP6 hiflow

both turbos are quite linear, yet GTRS feels like it has a fatter torque curve throughout the rev range

the OP6 GCG has that second of lag on downshift acceleration, with GTRS, this is almost unnoticeable.

my boost is limited to 16psi with AVCR and still standard actuator, whereas andymoocow's GTRS is running 18 psi, this may affect the overall performance. But overall you get what you pay for.

was good fun going for a spin in your car too mate, good to feel the old GCG again, ahhh good memories :D

I do love the GT-RS turbo still, and will most likely bolt another one on when this one comes to the end of its life. Sure there are PLENTY of other turbos out there with more power, but response is what i love when driving sydney roads, which are almost all 50km/hr near me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
    • Ceramic coating and heat shielding, you mean?
    • Turbos don't require pulling the motor apart so that's "easier". I would recommend the Nismo R3 turbos instead if you want to do stock twin turbo. It doesn't make as much power as the 2530s but it's only like ~50 whp off the mark and should have better response (ball bearing CHRA, slightly smaller turbo). A local that went with a Garrett G30 and 6boost manifold recently nearly burned his car to the ground after the hood insulator started melting and and burning so if you go single turbo I recommend doing a lot of research and validation work to make sure you don't do the same.
×
×
  • Create New...