Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What size rear is the op running to achieve the 290kw?

I'm about to order one of these but am unsure whether to get the .6 or .8 rear

My understanding is the op is running a 0.68 exhaust housing. joeyjoey runs the 0.68 rear and makes 280kw on 98 and 320kw on E85.

I would definitely recommend the 0.68 for a good combination between response, mid range and peak power. I think the 0.68 is the default option in the rb25 kit anyway.

yep its the .6 housing for sure...

here are the dyno charts, if anyone has any critic please comment...

Havnt had a good drive of it yet, but it feels good and thats the main thing.

and this time I got rmp, power & afr, easier to read.

post-26316-1291168445_thumb.jpgpost-26316-1291168433_thumb.jpg

Boost control still looks like a bit of an issue but its making good power at 4000rpm.

I would expect it to be a bit crisper and slightly earlier coming on boost and a little flatter holding your set level.

I agree, any ideas on what could help the response and get a flatter boost line?

I expected it to ramp up smoothly and a tad steeper.

and whats with the dip at 4800-5400rpm???

still looks a lil lazy getting onto boost... can you crank the gain up at all with the PFC boost kit?

i have a blitz dsbc spec S with the gain set to full and i see 20psi just before 3500 with the HKS 1 bar actuator

it trails off to just under 18 by redline, but i'm not worried as its safer that way and it's only a ~5rwkw difference

midrange and getting the party started sooner is where it's at

there's always going to be a slight dip just after you hit full boost... nothing really to worry about.... have a look at my graph at around 3500

i'll try to find a run on a dyno dynamics somewhere for an easier cross reference

Yeah I want mine to come on boost like that... I'll try changing the gain and see, although its going to hard to tell the difference without hitting the dyno again, $300 for a tune touch-up yesterday doesnt exactly make me want to keep seeing improvements on the dyno printouts.

$300 isnt too bad, depends how long they spent I suppose.

Excellent response/midrange there, 130rwkw at 3,500rpm, 195rwkw at 4,000rpm. Yup strange dip from 4800-5400, but then a nice top end especially considering the boost is dropping.

Joeyjoeys drops about 2psi but yours is about 4. So not too bad but I agree the gain should be wound up a bit more to improve it.

Still great result and I would prob leave it as is until you come back with E85 :P

Yeah I want mine to come on boost like that... I'll try changing the gain and see, although its going to hard to tell the difference without hitting the dyno again, $300 for a tune touch-up yesterday doesnt exactly make me want to keep seeing improvements on the dyno printouts.

leave it... its pretty damn good as is... very progressive/responsive with beefy midrange... would be really nice to drive I imagine... that's gotta be the best setup for a street driven GTSt IMO

I had one making 260rwkw but had the boost dropping off issue you were having... sold it before I sorted that out, would have been awesome with another 30rwkw

ok Im convinced time to move onto other things (of course checking the boost control gain first), like installing all of the CF Ive got coming, and rip through the masses of tyres Ive accumulated for destruction...

Your graph looks good now, it is however sprawled over 200rpm points so the boost response can look a little lazier than it should. I actually see it as being quite good. Nice to see the preload worked for you.

Can you check your EX cam gear setting?

Fact of the matter is, your motor is now making the power at the right intervals. Perhaps the change in cam timing has increased engine VE at lower RPM which has allowed it to accept more volume (decrease actual measured boost).

So I just got my car back from the tuners and Im not really disappointed with the results but am wondering if the dyno printout shows any issues.

253.2rwkw

HKS2835 ProS

sard 550cc

front facing plenum

powerFC with boost control kit

splitfire coilpacks

arc air intake

stock cams

adjustable exhaust cam pulley

98ULP

its disappointing that the dyno print doesnt show rpm so I find it harder to read than normal, but more experienced people may be able to see something from looking at this printout...

Does boost control look right?

Do I need the rpm indicator for more info of how the setup is performing?

Is power output lower than expected?

Any suggestions?

I did expect more peak power tbh, but Im more interested in midrange.

post-26316-1288450012_thumb.jpg

first of what kind of dyno is that?

how is it compare to a dynojet or dynopack?

yep its the .6 housing for sure...

here are the dyno charts, if anyone has any critic please comment...

Havnt had a good drive of it yet, but it feels good and thats the main thing.

and this time I got rmp, power & afr, easier to read.

post-26316-1291168445_thumb.jpgpost-26316-1291168433_thumb.jpg

Boost control as others have mentioned is shocking...

Ditch the Power FC boost control kit as it is junk, either install a Turbotech bleed valve for $35 which will work very well or fork out for a Blitz Dual solenoid (spec r or IDIII) so you can have multiple boost settings

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I currently have a 2008 370GT Coupe, with the big brakes (Akebeno if I'm correct), and Its coming time to get new pads. Previously, I had a 2003 350GT Coupe with the stock sized brakes, not Brembos. I had custom wheels on it that were pretty open to the brakes, and when I first put the wheels on it, the rims where completely coated with brake dust. A few years after adding the new rims, I needed to change to pads on that car. I didn't do any research, but I told the mechanic of the problem with the brake dust. I also told him I didn't track the car or even drive around the streets harshley. But the dust was an issue. The mechanics changed the pads to a different compound, and the dust was GONE! The other change I noted was that when coming to a complete stop, instead of having to press harder on the pedal as I approached 0kph, I had to actually lift off a little to not come to a hard jerky stop.( My unfounded explanation is they became stickier as they heated by stopping ) Since I got my 370gt with big brakes, I noticed that that as I came closer to stopping, I had to press harder and harder to reach a full stop. I am not talking about hard, just harder. I brought the car in from another state, so when I had a blue slip done, I asked the mechanic what he thought of the brakes, and he thought they were brilliant. The only negative of these pads on the 350GT, was that they squealed when cold. So driving out of a shopping center carpark, it was a little embarrassing, as the brakes squealed, and I am sure people thought that I needed new brakes, when they were actually fresh. I have no idea of what type of compound they were on the 350gt, but whatever it was, I want to get the exact same on my 370GT. They weren't ridiculously expensive, and were replaced at the local JAX (which is no longer open), so I am certain they would be a pretty common big brand, off the shelf type/brand. My current mechanic suggested I need top get the rear pads changed soonish, but he suggested standard Brembo pads. Which I expect to behave the same as the current ones and not like the ones on the 350GT.  I don't think dust will be an issue on the 370GT. With the behaviour I describe above on the 360GT, does anyone have a suggestion of pad material that will act like the change I had done on the 350GT?
    • The consult isn't even OBD1. It's a Nissan Consult. Proprietary.   Re read everything I've said. I specifically say, put down the laptop/tablet. Understand, and review the issue first. Logging voltages is the same as logging the converted value. Things like O2 that you say to log, is unusable for this, whether it be the voltage, or the value the ECU thinks.   The fact you don't know how to diagnose without looking at the computer, is exactly what I've said multiple times is the issue for why techs these days can't diagnose the fun issues with cars.
    • Breather for it. If it's anything like the GTRs it should run up to the top of a bellhousing bolt.
    • What basics? With these OBD1 ECUs it's not like the ECU will give you any real clues, it's not really doing any sanity checking of sensors/sensor data. My experience is actually a lot of sensors tend to be the source of the issue first and foremost, and checking everything gives you a direction to investigate. MAF/O2/STFT/LTFT should all kind of make sense. You can try little tricks of the trade like tapping the MAFs to see if it triggers a stumble, things like that. But once you've done a compression test knowing whether you have an air leak or fuel delivery problem is kind of hard to narrow down without sensor data. And you don't really know if all your sensors are making sense unless you can interrogate the ECU directly about what it's seeing for sensor data.
    • Absolutely this. Yes, except not vacuum hose. Something oil/fuel safe is a better idea.
×
×
  • Create New...