Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking at this car in QLD:

http://www.carsales.com.au/all-cars/privat...3&silo=1011

The sender sent me the import docs:

Can anyone tell me what they say? Anything of interest? I can see it said it had 32k KM....this was back in 2005. hmmm....

compliance done by Longden Enterprise. Are they reputable?

img007.pdf

img008.pdf

Edited by ironpaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't get it... why is any of this a concern to you as a potential buyer?? i am confused.. you can see condition of the car.. you know how many km it's traveled..

...what is the relevance of the documents?? and what does it matter if longden compliance's work is reliable or not if it was complied in 2005..

if you are able to inspect the car - then DO that... a small flight ticket is a small price to pay for peace of mind in these instances.. but then again only do that if you KNOW what you're looking for..

and remember.. you're looking at buying a CAR.. not paperwork..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't get it... why is any of this a concern to you as a potential buyer?? i am confused.. you can see condition of the car.. you know how many km it's traveled..

...what is the relevance of the documents?? and what does it matter if longden compliance's work is reliable or not if it was complied in 2005..

if you are able to inspect the car - then DO that... a small flight ticket is a small price to pay for peace of mind in these instances.. but then again only do that if you KNOW what you're looking for..

and remember.. you're looking at buying a CAR.. not paperwork..

Well, no, I don't really know what to look for. So you're saying that these papers are irrelevant, yet alot of people stress the "history" of the car is important; that its beneficial to check out the import paperwork.

And now you're saying its not. And you're saying that the reputation of a compliance workshop has no relevance to the condition of a car, even though you mentioned in another thread that the compliance done on your Soarers was not acceptable. Well, I would think that if compliance wasn't carried out (fluids flushed/changed) correctly, then the drivetrain condition would be affected down the road?

Like you said - its only worthwhile for me to inspect the car IF I knew WTF I was doing, which I frankly admit I don't know a whole alot apart from the basics, and that which has been mentioned on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, another scenario. There's a R34 in Melb - imported/complied/registered in July. Rang the owner. He's got no compliance/import paperwork. Doesn't know where car was complied. Claimed he bought it off a friend and that he wants to sell it to buy a BMW. under such circumstances, would you purchase a vehicle based on inspection/test drive alone? I'm inclined to think something there's something dodgy with this car if its imported recently yet there is no paperwork for anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^ That last scenario is correct.

Given that the car was imported in 2005, it's entirely possible that it had those kms on it when it arrived in Australia, but as far as verifying mileage goes, the documents they've sent you don't make a very convincing case either way.

The fact that the owner has held on to them for 5 years, however, points to someone who keeps their documents in order, which usually also points to a well serviced car. I think it's worth going over to have a look at it. The paperwork's not ideal but it's better than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it's better than what you'd get in say scenario two... Where you have a fresh import that has no paperwork...

Sorry if what I said earlier seemed callous or abrasive what I was trying to say was... If the compliance work has been done then it's been done..

Also.. Car's now on 90xxxkm and was on 32xxx when it was imported in 05... So basically.. Any issues from japan or fluid changes should have been carried out or replaced during it's time in Australia.. In short... Five years on and 60xxx km later... A few Japanese characters on a PDF file lose their relevance .. The Australian service history and documents are now what's important :) and if this owner has kept 5 year old Japanese docs then most likely he's kept aust docs too

As for me whinging about compliance... My issues were a bit stickier.. In that (if I may be so bold as to disclose details) the evidence package (itemized reciept claiming works performed) were incorrect and weren't conclusive with the physical cars../

Edit none of the below are things that happened these are just examples of possibilities... All I'm saying is.. Let's say trans n brake fluid was replaced in compliance.. That's irrelevant now cos it should've been changed again by now anyway

This sounds bad to you I'm sure but all it means is car may not have a third child safety bracket installed.. Or it may mean certain corners were cut to save money.. Doesn't mean I get a worse car.. It doesn't mean my car is worth any less money or that it has shady history.. it just causes massive headache for me at registration inspection...

So to summarize yes import docs have relevance but in this instance... Because the car has probably spent the most of it's life and travelled most of it's distance in aust... The Australian history is most important

The Melbourne case however... Being a ten year old car that's only been here a matter of months then he'll yeah the jap docs are important

Edited by Mr Eps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its pretty irrelevant what the compliance was like on a car done 5 years ago . most of it is servicing , testing , documentation .

I wouldn't give to much weight to auction km either

inspect the car , its condition is the most important thing . no good having a pig that has good service history. if you don't know what to look for get someone who does to check it. not saying service history isnt important , but sometimes cars look good on paper but in reality are not what they are cracked up to be . inspect thoroughly

Edited by autoworx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^this

which is why i always say - you're buying a CAR not paperwork..

(i really need to stop saying that. it's becoming like a tourette's twitch, my work colleagues are starting to worry) (who am i kidding i've been unemployed for two days now *cries* )

haha

but yeah - back on topic.. you were asking what those papers mean - we told you they have little to no relevance ... which...

while it's true - doesn't really answer your question.. which was "can we read this japanese stuff"

sooooo

you can pay a uni student to read it for you -

my advice is - take chris out for a day - he's a wealth of knowledge.. so yeah - fly up to qld.. have a look at the car.. take chris with you but remember benevolence goes a long way, so take him out for tea too or go to a movie :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Car is getting Compliance at Longden, I have visited there and Micheal and Jesse really know there stuff and if you search the forum for Longden A.K.A ISASO, you will see very positive feedback, both the owners have Skyline so there enthusiasts as well

Why you bother about a compliance Job done 5 years ago on the other is beyond me :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Are these the Dmax ones you are in reference too? https://justjap.com/collections/driveshafts-bearings/products/d-max-reinforced-replacement-rear-driveshaft-set-fits-nissan-s13-s14-s15-r32-r33-r34-c35#description Not a bad idea to get the uni flange ones. I have sent just jap an email too. Will see what they say lmao. Only thing is the Dmax ones are on a big back order. Low key anything will be better then my OEM ones I got as they are sounding like popcorn when I go under load lmao 😂☠️🪦.
    • They should do. I have S14 (or something S chassis, anyway) driveshafts in my R32 (because my diff flanges have 3x2). They're the right length. When you go looking for R32/3/4 driveshafts (for turbos), they're all the same thing, so are the same length. So there really shouldn't be any reason why those cheapies from JJ won't also fit an R34. R32/3 NA should also be the same thing. The (3x the price) D-Max ones are uni-fit. They have 5x1 and 3x2 bolt holes and say they cover all the cars. So that would also suggest that they are all the same except for the flanges. And in that case, the flange goes both ways. I'd be buying the D-Max ones if I ever have to replace a shaft. Because that will open up diff options without needing to juggle shafts also. Juggling shafts is gay.
    • Yeah with the adaptors they do look like the photo above - just the fitment within the plenum itself and then further with the rail to the intake is questionable - we shall see tomorrow hopefully once I get some replies from Aeroflow, maybe those bosses are the missing piece....
    • Should be fine, if you have it sitting too far in, you end up just spraying the walls and have shit idle. You "can" run them like that, however I don't think it's a great idea (also depends on your plenum, might be good to just get the injector bosses first, mock it up and see if you need to get the bottom extension) Ideally your injectors, with the extension should look like this  (Not my photos, just Google)
    • Thanks for the replies guys, it's really appreciated.  It seems the kit was supposed to come with those injector bosses but hasn't. Unsure if they'll help as even with the adaptors to make them a 3/4 height injector they still sit too far out so mount the fuel rail?
×
×
  • Create New...