Jump to content
SAU Community

All C210 Owners?


Recommended Posts

Red one looks like a C10 one, cause of the mounting at the back

and black one is stick on which wasn't how they were.

But yes they are of C210 size and shape, same as C110

Edited by Socrates
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have found i have made some mistakes.

The blue is pretty dark, took it as black.

Both of are of C110/210 size and shape.

Badge on left,

no idea what it's from, aftermarket

Right, C110

genuine.

Note rear quarter panel on JDM C210:

post-67860-1288712975_thumb.jpg

My car before new badges:

post-67860-1288713461_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, with C210 onwards Blue = Non turbo, Red = Turbo

Cost me $174 for 2x "Skyline" Badges and 2x blue GT badges from yahoo japan through jesse streeter., nissan wanted $300.

Edited by Socrates
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, with C210 onwards Blue = Non turbo, Red = Turbo

Cost me $174 for 2x "Skyline" Badges and 2x blue GT badges from yahoo japan through jesse streeter., nissan wanted $300.

C210,s never came out with turbos, c211,s did in japan April 1980, those badges fit

on the rear quarter panel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C210,s never came out with turbos, c211,s did in japan April 1980, those badges fit

on the rear quarter panel.

technically yes but when people say C210 they mean the whole model not just series 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

technically yes but when people say C210 they mean the whole model not just series 1

Rightly so, did you know there is a c111 model from the c110, it has fuel injection and a 2 litre 6

also it has a rear wiper for a 4 door sedan, and 4 wheel disc drakes,

Also some of the c210/c211 came out with leather interior,

in australia a good friend of mine owed a wrecker had a 4 cylinder c210 sedan yes"" sedan"" not wagon

with leaf springs. it had the 1.8 motor the same as a 180b.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rightly so, did you know there is a c111 model from the c110, it has fuel injection and a 2 litre 6

also it has a rear wiper for a 4 door sedan, and 4 wheel disc drakes,

Also some of the c210/c211 came out with leather interior,

in australia a good friend of mine owed a wrecker had a 4 cylinder c210 sedan yes"" sedan"" not wagon

with leaf springs. it had the 1.8 motor the same as a 180b.

Cheers

didn't know about C111 having fuel injection.

did series 1 c210's have fuel injection JDM?

leaf springs on a 1800TI doesn't sound right, unless they had non independent suspension for the lower models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rightly so, did you know there is a c111 model from the c110, it has fuel injection and a 2 litre 6

also it has a rear wiper for a 4 door sedan, and 4 wheel disc drakes,

Also some of the c210/c211 came out with leather interior,

in australia a good friend of mine owed a wrecker had a 4 cylinder c210 sedan yes"" sedan"" not wagon

with leaf springs. it had the 1.8 motor the same as a 180b.

Cheers

Don't know where you got this information, but the first factory EFI (L-Jetronic by Bosch) was on HGC211 & S30 280Z as far as I am aware.

D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know where you got this information, but the first factory EFI (L-Jetronic by Bosch) was on HGC211 & S30 280Z as far as I am aware.

D

The first efi that nissan fitted was used on the cedrics in 1973 and if im right in japan they go back as far as the late 60;s

EKW WRECKERS in Melbourne had a 1974 2 door coupe ''240''C which which is a cedric in Japan it was a mint green and fully fitted,IT HAD THE EFI SYSTEM, K Jetronic.

even had an air purifiyer for the rear passengers when they smoked.

it was offered to me for $1.200.00 I had no money at the time, and my friend bought it in Nowra.NSW.

as you can tell im not as young as you guys, but believe me ive seen strange things in nissan cars, the 70,s was a great time.

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first efi that nissan fitted was used on the cedrics in 1973 and if im right in japan they go back as far as the late 60;s

EKW WRECKERS in Melbourne had a 1974 2 door coupe ''240''C which which is a cedric in Japan it was a mint green and fully fitted,IT HAD THE EFI SYSTEM, K Jetronic.

even had an air purifiyer for the rear passengers when they smoked.

it was offered to me for $1.200.00 I had no money at the time, and my friend bought it in Nowra.NSW.

as you can tell im not as young as you guys, but believe me ive seen strange things in nissan cars, the 70,s was a great time.

Cheers.

Also i need to add R30;s in kuwait were imported with a carburettor not with Fuel injection, :devil: the c211 and 280zx only had efi.

also the some of r30 had the H165 Solid axle diff in Kuwait, the gtex had the independant diff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didn't know about C111 having fuel injection.

did series 1 c210's have fuel injection JDM?

leaf springs on a 1800TI doesn't sound right, unless they had non independent suspension for the lower models.

yes, and they are not as collectable there,Japan.. the earlier C110 is and very expensive too, the Japanese love them.

the c210 JDM has fuel injection,I own one. the gtex and the gtes, the gtel had a 2 litre carby and is a slug to drive, it has too much

emmission controls.

Very true about the 1800 skyline, it had the wagon system fitted with the solid axle, but remember they were rare and only a few had that set up. Malaysia, and Singapore had some of these cars they used them for Taxis.

as for the efi fittings nissan fitted them in the last of the 180b...bluebird in japan in 1976,

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know where you got this information, but the first factory EFI (L-Jetronic by Bosch) was on HGC211 & S30 280Z as far as I am aware.

D

Mario has a fairly awesome collection of English/Japanese books and brochures relating specifically to the C210/C211. Not to mention 25+ years behind the wheels of his C210s. I'd trust anything that he posts to be very well researched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Seatbelt bolts are 7/16 UNF in most cases
    • Yes, this is why I end up being 'vocal' with executives. "I want it" can't be "Just because we should have it" you need reasons. It has way too big knock on effects to simply want something "Just because" at that level in orgs with 10,000+ employees. Currently, message labelling. Sounds great. Except there is no governance on how to actually HANDLE message labels, so I may as well implement the labels as "Pink Flamingo" or "Conrod" or "Massive Dildo" and force people to choose one for every message, with no framework underpinning any of it. It has no value and can actually have detrimental value if all it does is serve to annoy people into clicking something random, or just using the default for everything, especially if there's no repercussions for getting it wrong, no monitoring for people doing it right, and no guidance on what needs to be what label. "But we need message labels!" f**k sake.
    • It's worse than that. They cannot even picture the full scope of what it is that they are pitching or wanting. They see the core idea and cannot conceive of any of the side effects, compromises, losses of existing functionality that needs to be replaced somehow, etc etc, that come with doing these things. So how can they do a cost/benefit when they don't even know what the full set of changes actually looks like?
    • I mean something people seem to be WOEFUL at is doing a proper cost/benefit analysis. Going cloud is great, if it saves you time and money. Does it? I have found a LOT of managers just want 'the new thing' with SUB-zero understanding of what it is and how it functions and why they need it. I spend a lot of time on that point nowadays too.
    • I'm an engineer. I am not supposed to do IT. I have been doing my company's IT for 25 years, because initially there was no one else capable and since because I don't trust anyone. Back in the day, we used to run a Linux server with just sendmail level mail handling. Everything was POP and SMTP. Then, someone demanded calendaring and the like, so I implemented Scalix (an OS Exchange clone) - from scratch. Migrated all the numpties over, administered that system for years. Then Scalix started to decline. So I spun up a full Zimbra system. Same same as Scalix, but different (ie, not even a fork). Ran that for a while in parallel with Scalix as I tried to migrate old users over. Both of these were on prem, with local backup in the case of Zimbra. (No backup at all on the Scalix server! Gasp!) At some point, I spat the dummy, after years of this, and capitulated and bought O365 for the whole company and migrated everyone off the on prem stuff and shuffled them off to the cloud. It has been easier and shitter ever since, seeing as MS cannot leave anything alone for more than 3 minutes and have to keep changing everything and making it "better' (I read that as "harder"!). It's like their entire crew are ADHD squirrels on meth. Meanwhile, all our data has been kept on prem on file servers with decent backup. Now the higher ups are demanding that we migrate all the data to the cloud. I am shuddering at the idea that it will all be held to ransom on some shit AWS or, even worse, Azure/Sharepoint system where you're at the mercies of the above posted price hikes, commercial disputes, company collapses/takeovers/DOS attacks/etc etc. I hate it. But... if it can get me free of the bloody IT shit so I can finally concentrate on real engineering work for the first time in 25 years, then.... good?
×
×
  • Create New...