Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I read every thread of the 8 pages on gtr.uk about camshaft.

- I have a RB26 with GT-SS. almost no lag, very responsive and I like it this way!

- So I'm looking at a camshaft that will give me more power without taking out the response or barely..

- I'm also looking for a good idle, (I'm aware that the smoothest idle would be my oem cams)

- Drop-in cams is a big + over cams that need custom works to fit.

Would the tomei poncam type-B be the perfect match for what I'm looking for?

Thanks!

How do you expect cams to give you more power? In most situations they will just move the power curve.

Without head work etc, IMO its pointless and you certainly don't need to change them

How do you expect cams to give you more power? In most situations they will just move the power curve.

Without head work etc, IMO its pointless and you certainly don't need to change them

the usual non-constructive stonewall response from nismoid.. perhaps he did mean midrange power.

type b's seem to be the way to go for better idle, both have the same 9.15mm lift, they're my choice

with those turbos id just use a set of cam gears, advance up the intake 4-8 degrees and plot the results, then play with the exhaust but in small increments.

If not i found the Greddy procams 264 with 9.7mm lift to work real nice compared to the poncams but ive only compared them in engines making at least another 50rwkw over the gtss so it not a real help but a good cam comparison nonetheless..

How do you expect cams to give you more power? In most situations they will just move the power curve.

Without head work etc, IMO its pointless and you certainly don't need to change them

Well by looking at this chart from a supra tuner, it's pretty obvious that all 3 camshaft setup gives more power than the OEM setup.

449coip.jpg

I expect the samething to happen to a rb26.

Supra 2JZ graph? Irrelevant for RB26's.

the usual non-constructive stonewall response from nismoid.. perhaps he did mean midrange power.

type b's seem to be the way to go for better idle, both have the same 9.15mm lift, they're my choice

How was it non-constructive exactly?

We've told him before stocker cams are the way to go with that turbo selection for his use of the car (he does want ultimate response afterall).

So in saying that, ultimate response, the stock cams fit that bill perfectly combined with a set of cam gears (which a few have told him before also :))

I mean end of the day if he wants, the Poncams will idle fine etc, barely noticeable however costly exercise should it ruin that which he set out to achieve.

seriously if you want good response and good idle stock cams are the way to go. any cam is going to give you a slightly lumpier idle and going to move your peak torque UP the RPM scale. for GTSS probably the best option for what you want is cam gears. you say you have them but have they been tuned? I gained 30kw midrange in my old GTR with cam gear tuning and about 5kw peak power. so peak power change was quite small but the difference in the midrange and the transition onto boost was amazing.

so yeah, the best bet for you is cam gear tuning. or maybe a set of 34 N1 cams, they are a very mild upgrade.

seriously if you want good response and good idle stock cams are the way to go. any cam is going to give you a slightly lumpier idle and going to move your peak torque UP the RPM scale. for GTSS probably the best option for what you want is cam gears. you say you have them but have they been tuned? I gained 30kw midrange in my old GTR with cam gear tuning and about 5kw peak power. so peak power change was quite small but the difference in the midrange and the transition onto boost was amazing.

so yeah, the best bet for you is cam gear tuning. or maybe a set of 34 N1 cams, they are a very mild upgrade.

I know it sound stupid but I had tomei cam gears fitted on the dyno but the tuner never played with them. I bought these because i got them for 150$. However, when I went on the dyno, the tuner said he would have to charge me like 1-2 hours to get the best out of them and at 220$/hour. I said..well forget the cam tuning lol!

I wasn't expecting such a huge increase from cam gears tuning.

Like you said, with camshaft, I might only get 10whp more peak but if I can get 30lbs torque and 40whp more at midrange(3.5 to 6k) I think it's really worth it and it will make driving more fun.

yeah but cams cost $800-$1000 for a pair, plus maybe $300 fitting, plus you will need a re-tune of the ecu AND adjust the cam gears to get the most out of them. so you're looking at nearly $2000 to do it properly.

for 2 hours of dyno time to set-up the cam gears you will get an excellent result for $400 and you wont loose any response (you will gain some) and your idle wont be much affected at all (slight change).

for what you want you'd be mad to go to all the expense of buying cams. especially since you already have cam gears and just need to spend 1-2hours to have them set-up.

A little off topic an might open a can of worms

but would the same advice be given for a built motor with minor headwork an 2530's???????

Would the bigger turbos give more relevance to bigger cam's

Just curious as to others opinions

A little off topic an might open a can of worms

but would the same advice be given for a built motor with minor headwork an 2530's???????

Would the bigger turbos give more relevance to bigger cam's

Just curious as to others opinions

yeah definitely look at cams with headwork and bigger turbos. but with small bolt ons and standard engine and head there is not a lot to be had. it will fatten up the area around 5,000rpm and give some top end gain but will be at the expense of low down response.

If not i found the Greddy procams 264 with 9.7mm lift to work real nice compared to the poncams but ive only compared them in engines making at least another 50rwkw over the gtss so it not a real help but a good cam comparison nonetheless..

Did you have to do any head modifications to get the Greddy cams to fit?

I always thought the poncams type b was the biggest you could go without modifying the head?

For my 10 cents worth the type B cams suck teh balls.

If you have a proper look you get the following:

Open Closed Centreline

Stock cams

14 degree overlap (commonly modded to 20 degrees)

Intake 240 degrees 7 BTDC 53 ABDC 113 degrees

Exhaust 250 degrees 65 BBDC 7 ATDC 118 degrees

Tomei Poncam A

31 degree overlap

Intake 260 degrees 20 BTDC 60 ABDC 110 degrees

Exhaust 252 degrees 61 BBDC 11 ATDC 115 degrees

Tomei Poncam B

35 degree overlap (modded to 33 degrees)

Intake 260 degrees 20 BTDC 60 ABDC 110 degrees

Exhaust 260 degrees 65 BBDC 15 ATDC 115 degrees

Note the only difference between type A & B is the exhaust cam. Having reverted from the type B to a smaller inlet & exhaust cam the thing goes much, much harder at 4000rpm without giving up anything worth worrying about at the top end when running approx 1 bar on 2860-5's.

But for what it is worth the type B's idle fine. The most common reason the RB26 will hunt at idle with them in is you have the idle screw adjusted too far out.

Lastly I wouldn't bother doing cams until you have the motor out. Only then is it worth thinking about.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this is an old thread but I have a particular attachment to the ENR34, so I don't think additional content hurts. For starters, I agree with everyone here in that the performance of a stock R34 GTR is a pretty low bar and one that you're going to spend a lot of money "matching". Now if you're willing to deviate from that template as your goal, you'll be much better off and enjoy the car much more. The engine in the NA R34s is a real kick in the nuts in terms of upgradability compared to previous generation NA cars. The NA heads on the RB2X NEOs have MUCH smaller intake port cross sections and are not compatible with any of the aftermarket forward-facing manifolds available for the RB25DET. This can be remedied with a RB25DET NEO head, but those are expensive relative to what they are. A full long-block from a turbo AWD Stagea is generally a better value and will run you about $4000 USD to get it to you. This will get you the stronger RB26DETT rods, as well. That would give you a base to build off of to be safe in the 400whp range. Not shooting for the moon, but if the stock R34 was your bar, this engine would buy you enough to be just North of stock GTR power. A forward facing manifold would allow for the easiest method toward using Bosch EV14 format injectors such as those from Injector Dynamics and FIC, to name a couple. People hate them because they're copies, but Greddy fakes can be had for around $300 USD. With what the fuel rail, regulator, injectors, and the rail adds, figure $2000 USD for the whole setup including the manifold. With the OEM brackets and a bit of trimming to the ends of the lower frame rails, the OEM intercooler mounting brackets can be used to mount an OEM GTR intercooler, or an aftermarket one made for a GTR. Those are handy vs a universale due to the angles that the end tanks have on them. Then your plumbing become super straightforward at that point despite having to cut a hole where the battery is an a matching one on the other side for the pipes. Battery can go to the trunk. I'd round up to a healthy $2000 USD here too (maybe even a tiny more) to allow for a nice aftermarket unit and some pipe fabrication. Or if you can find someone that's upgrading to something larger, the used market comes in clutch here for a decent savings. I won't even get into turbo sizing as that's something that would be for yourself to determine. HOWEVER, for the purposes of your stated goals, a Borg Warner 7064 with an internal wastegate would be a perfect spooler and would make stock GTR power easily. It would also bolt up to your OEM manifold (that would come with the DET you purchased a couple steps above) if it were ordered with a T3 flange. More with adequate fuel. If you can stick with the OEM exhaust manifold then expect to be in the whole about $6000 USD for decent turbo like the one suggested, a down pipe, new O2, and full exhaust to mate up, and upgrades to the integrated BOV in an EFR or a standalone BOV for a different turbo, as well as an aftermarket IWG (internal waste gate). Those last two are definitely optional and unnecessary. All of this stuff above does you no good without any way of tuning and or monitoring the engine. Bite the bullet on a standalone engine management solution. If your experience with wiring is limited, you're going to have to hand it off to someone else, though. Unfortunately, the adapter/patch harnesses available are typically made around the GTT which does not include AWD, and the GTR, which integrates into a lot of chassis features that aren't present in your wiring interface. So the ENR34 is the oddball. So you'll want to expand a bit on your selection and find an ECU that's capable of running the ATTESA pump also. I have a Link Thunder, but you don't need quite that much ECU to accommodate that. You WILL need someone with the know-how to tune it and code those features into whatever software it uses. And to wire it up. This will be your most significant expense. Call it $6000 USD with an ECU, an okay wiring job (no motorsport grade at this price), aftermarket triggers and R35 coils, and the time it takes to tune the ECU with added features (electronic boost control solenoid, MAP, IAT, the new triggers, and ATTESA) and don't be surprised if it's more if you want better work done. Grab a clutch made for any RB pull transmission R32/R33GTR made for the power handling capacity you're looking for. Budget $1500 USD for a new good one. That's about $20,000 USD for an engine you've upgraded yourself and had wired and tuned by someone else. That's no brakes (ENR34 brakes are pathetic), suspension (again, pathetic), or wheels and tires. So you're pretty spot on in terms of spending $30,000 USD extra on the car just to get it to perform a little better than a stock R34 GTR while looking like a bone stock ENR34 with some wheels and suspension mods. That doesn't include fluids, maintenance items, gaskets/seals, repairs needed or anything else discovered along the way. But you'll have a car you can take to the track and have fun without worrying as much about nicks and dings.  
    • Okay so, please read this. car started and ran fine. got my tuned ecu by RSenthalpy, did a bunch of pulls to test it out and finally drive the car after half a year of it just sitting and idling at most. Everything was good, thing ran flawlessly and had so much power, didn't feel slower than a Prius anymore. Parked it back and turned it off.  Next day, I install an AFR and start the car. Didn't wire anything to the ecu. Just gauge.  Car started, but died out in about a minute. I figured it was cause my car was on a lift and the fuel was really low and old. I add 5 gallons of fuel, still cranks but no start. I remove all AFR wiring (tapped into double din acc and power wires but there was a nest of wiring there so I was worried I messed something up. tried to put it back to how it was prior to afr install.) Still cranks no start. Changed spark plugs with brand new ones Changed fuel pump with a new one (verified working) Did compression test , compression came back all at 150ish. All fuses are good, Relay seemed good but ill double check by switching similar relays around. Verified MAF is working - Ended up getting curious as to why fuel pump is not priming when ignition is on, so I cut the fuel pump ground and power and connected them directly to a portable jumper. I also disconnected fuel line to fuel rail to verify fuel is being sent. So with direct jumper power, the fuel pump turns on and shot gas everywhere through the fuel pipe that I had disconnected, so ny doing that, I verified no clogs in fuel lines or filter. - Tried starting the car with that jumper directly wired to power and ground, but car still did not start. I'm guessing its a CAS issue but im a little scared to check it without messing up timing or anything else since I actually dont understand how to check CAS lol. If anyone has any other suggestions or recommendations , please let me know.
    • Hi all. I am aware there is lots of discussions about jacking points, where to lift the car and what not. But as usual just a lot of "in my opinion" and nothing definitive, and everyone does it in a different way. I want to hear from some experienced people on which points on the car it's okay/safe/recommended to lift the car using a four point hoist/lift. I will attach some images of my underbody. Sills are largely okayish, the driver side jacking point is pretty mangled though and it looks like the underfloor is slightly pushed in too, but I might be wrong. In the German Skyline forum, the consensus is to use the sidemember chassis rails in the front and the rear subframe? bushing in the rear. I know the manual says to never use the sidemember for loading but lots of folk do it and it was definitely done on my car too as they are slightly bent too. Based on the images, what points do I use to not make the already present damage worse? I'd use wood or rubber blocks to spread the load across a bigger area of course. Driver side sidemember and jacking point mangled one) https://imgur.com/a/eKjzrJX Driver side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/W3DWF1P Passenger side sidemember and jacking point https://imgur.com/a/65UvIJe Passenger side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/h3k7j53 We can also see some underbody rust but so far it all looks somewhat treatable and nothing that requires a Yoshida style restoration.
    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...