Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys ive put in avcr like 3 months ago and its not a daily driver but i was boosting about .7/.8 of a bar when i had it running. but now its gone back to stock boost for some strange reason????

is there a valve in the soilernoid or a like rubber olive??

and the car hasnt changed help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343058-avcr-problem/
Share on other sites

yes and i tryd chaning the boost lower or higher and it didnt change on a and b and i check all wiring and vac lines and i cant see what it could be

Which gear are you boosting it in, cause 1st and 2nd wont fully boost, did you change the duty cycle at all?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343058-avcr-problem/#findComment-5535029
Share on other sites

I had the same problem.... it could be 2 things. Either it reset itself or your hose from the stock solonoid is sucking air. Make sure the stock hose (if not in use) is blocked off with a screw or something and set your avc-r again. I have played around with my avc-r for ages and i have stock components. I worked out that to keep a reasonably steady boost at .7 of a bar i set it to .7bar with the duty cycle at 50%. MAKE SURE YOU DONT PRESS INITIALISE OR IT WILL RESET ALL YOUR SETTINGS :(

If you have any modifications i suggest setting the duty cycle to 40% and work your way up while testing the car to ensure you dont have spikes of overboost.

Good luck with it mate

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343058-avcr-problem/#findComment-5545203
Share on other sites

its unlikely the avc-r would reset itself, the tune and tune data is stored in NVRAM so even if you nuke its power source it wont loose the data

the safc, powerfc, rsm etc are all like this, their tune and data is in NVRAM to prevent magic erasing and resettings

its more likely a mechanical vac line or someone has been fiddling

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343058-avcr-problem/#findComment-5545264
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My understanding is that UV tends to accelerate the aging process. If the car has been garaged, then you could probably get away with extending beyond 10 years. FWIW, in 2015, I had tyres on my 180B SSS that had a 3-digit code (2 for week, 1 for decade), ending in 0, so could have been more than 30 years old, but still worked fine. I did replaced them very quickly, though, once I discovered what the code meant!
    • But we haven't even gotten to the point of talking about stateless controllers or any of the good stuff yet!
    • You guys need to take this discussion to another thread if you want to continue it, most of the last 2 pages has nothing to do with OP's questions and situation
    • And this, is just ONE major issue for closed loop control, particularly using PID. One such issue that is created right here, is integrator wind up. But you know GTSBoy, "it's just a simple PID controller"...  
    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
×
×
  • Create New...