Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I didn't say that I dont think you ran a 12.5 and neither do I doubt any of your other claims. I was just trying to add a bit more info to the discussion.

Thats the problem with a written message, the tone of the missive is easily misconstrued.

I do infact give a Z that pulls times like yours a lot of cred. its just like you say though:

Skyline owners are always sceptical about Zed's cause they've been indoctrinated with the gospel according to HPI/Zoom, who go out of their way to bag Zed's

The more fast nissans out there the better.

Ryan.

P.S. just for reference sake my 60' time was 1.864sec and I had over 45L of fuel on board and the tyres (17's) were at street inflation. I also did 4 back to back 13.0XZ times before stopping for the day.

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

TTZ32,

No worries mate :)

Not sure if my 60' times are average or not but most of my 13.0XZ times were close to, if not, 7,000 rpm launches. It is hard to tell for certain from inside that car with a helmet on if the lack of traction is the clutch or tyres slipping. But observers on the day said 1st and 2nd did have traction problems.

I'm pretty sure my clutch is still a standard one and in my book they are bloody impressive to handle those sort of launches one after another and feel the same every run.

So to answer your question I think there was a bit of both clutch slippage and tyre spin so for the next time I'll have:

new clutch, as little fuel as I can get away with and hopefully either some better rubber of less pressure in the tyres........I need a 12sec time slip :)

Originally posted by adam 32

no doubt its a good time but i have never seen any car like yours run close to a 12.5.....

I agree.... timeslips speak a thousand words! ...except for mine, they spawn a thousand jokes...:)

As for a 12.87 nearly stock... WOW... but like a lot of other people here, i'll believe it when I see it :)

Holy crap... how did you put the power down to get those et's? Those 60' times are impressive, and terminal speed shows your definanlty making the power. Lets say, for arguments sake, that its all in the 60' (i ran 2.3 60' vs your 2.0), how does the Z do it?

I'm guessing its a combination of:

- auto transmission

- Z's weight distribution

= Z's outright weight (better traction)

- tyre contact patch (i only ran 225s)

The suspension is virtually identical between Z's and 'lines, apart from ride height. I just can't see what gives them the upper hand. Anyone know?

edit: whoops, looked at wrong mph reading :rolleyes:

I must Admit they are very good times! and like everyone else here am astonished! however IMMACUL8 who posts on here quite often at the time only had 12psi from a SINGLE turbo exhaust and SAFC and beat a twin turbo 300ZX with quite a few witnesses.

I just have one question I am not doubting anything, but if they have such minimal mods and are able make 12.86 then how come a standard GTST with light mods and single turbo ATE the twin turbo 300ZX. No offence IMMACUL8 but i can't see your GTST doing a 12.5........

What were some of the other skylines times doing that night? did you manage to go up against any at all? I honetsly didn't think that 300ZX where that fast even with TWIN TURBO

hahaha yeh thats my mate:P

he went down to the drags when we all went down (2-3 weeks ago) and pulled a 14.223 which is a damn good time for a COMPLETELY STANDARD 300ZX.....

this was one of the cars that i was basing my theory on - that a lightly modded 300 couldnt pull a 12.5 but obviously i was wrong!

Yeah 14.2 is a little slow, but up the boost to 12psi or so and it should run mid 13's no problems:)

I had traction problems, but took it easy off the line, I have run a 1.9 60' with 225 tyres previously:)

I gotta get some slicks, then you guys will see a Zed run low 12's:D

If I wasn't so tight with coin, there would be a set of bigger intercoolers and some more boost, then maybe an 11 sec pass

BTW, I run a MAX of 14psi boost:)

1.9 60'... do Queensland tracks run down the side of a hill or something?

Reminds me of a (really old) joke: A blonde and a brunette jump off a cliff. Who hits the ground first?

The brunette. Blonde had to stop and ask for directions. :rolleyes:

No, i'm not sure how thats relevant to Z's vs 'lines either... perhaps the 'line is the blonde?

Nah...Willowbank is fairly flat I think:)

Whats the quickest Skyline here? there would be a few running 12's surely? I've only seen a couple race, Boostmiester was one, but he was running low 14's I think?

How much would you pay for a real tidy R32 with decent mods? Are they much better or quicker than an S13? (Silly question to ask on a Skyline forum:) )

What are the 4 door Skylines like? are they much heavier than the 2 door?

No, keeping the Zed:) Just thinking of another car, I like the look of the R32's, but I wouldn't want to spend anymore than $15g.

I know FA about Skylines, just doing a bit of research, and you guys might know a bit about them:)

It's gotta be something that will take a real good flogging without crapping

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you go about diagnosing ecu's that don't have data logging, is it more experience at that point and just trying out things that you think will fix the issue?
    • Stock O2 are basically useless beyond anything at stoich. Any misfire will also be seen as lean. The stock O2 also read a collective exhaust gas volume, not each cylinder. Sputtering and missing means not each cycle is firing, and some are. Which means even if rich, as shit, on cylinders as they miss, they'll read lean, but the cylinders that did fire will read rich, and combined, well, they can read anything from rich to lean.   Start with the basics before even going looking at sensor values.   Edit: I say the above, and that's coming from the guy with a few thousand dollars worth of scan tools sitting right beside me right now that I use frequently for my job.
    • I just finished up a manual swap and I have a 1999 S2 AWD automatic in my garage, depending on where you are located. I'm in the the midwest of the US.
    • I’ve heard it can be done, you need to redrill the holes where they bolt to the chassis and apart from that they are the same. I’ve never done it or know anyone personally that has, it’s just something I’ve heard 
    • If it's reading full rich prior to a misfire that gives one directional hint, if it's already reading lean, etc. If it's reading pretty cleanly stoichiometric then suddenly drops out from a misfire that suggests it's not air mass estimation that's the problem. Could be ignition, could be something more subtle. Could be the CAS has decided to start dropping out at random or the drive pin is worn leading to excessive lash and trigger errors. LTFT can tell you the same but it's slower to react and if this is a recent issue it might not have stabilized. STFT stuck in one direction vs fluctuating back and forth can be used instead but I like to read O2 voltages anyways and interpret directly. If the O2 voltages make no sense in general or are super slow to react it could also be a failing O2 sensor. There's no real error correction for failing O2 sensors in these cars.
×
×
  • Create New...