Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looks like the ASSET-Cam will be most constructive Craig.

I wonder about two things...

a) how strongly and vigorously an offender will try to get off a charge and...

b) how accurate the system is and how reliable the calibration will be.

Good find. :D

Looks like the ASSET-Cam will be most constructive Craig.

I wonder about two things...

a) how strongly and vigorously an offender will try to get off a charge and...

b) how accurate the system is and how reliable the calibration will be.

Good find. :D

I agree - especially when you consider that drivers will need to be able to judge how close they can approach another car without having to worry about getting a ticket.. but I'm guessing that you have to be driving very close/dangerously to be getting a ticket.

Does this mean that the police can be fined when they sit 30cm from your bumper before they pull you over for a "random" inspection to see if your car is dangerously unroadworthy?

Should have it detect police that park illegally to get some lunch or whatever..

or those police bikes during peak traffic illegally driving on the highway between cars.. has anyone else (in sth east qld) noticed how many of them are doing this during peak hour on the M1

You've got to be joking?

We already have this technology on our 90 stretch to Helltown and yesterday I was in the queue with a front row seat.

We're all crawling along at 70 to 90 so obviously the vehicles start to bunch up. (the Bruce Highway goes from 110 down to 80/90 until 20k's North of Helltown)

Take into account that there are all sorts of cars mixed in with semis of all descriptions, hills, grey nomads so the acceleration/deceleration rates are varied.

Next thing one of these electronic marvels lights up and you guessed it, someone up front panics and touches his brakes.

Nose to tail accidents were narrowly averted but it was a fine dry day so we continued on.

2K's down the road the next electronic marvel lights up warning that we're all speeding and fines/demerit points will be ours. No-one is doing anything near 90 yet again on come the stop lights.

Not only is this technology hopelessly inaccurate, it's road user's money spent in the most appalling fashion and all under the guise of road safety.

I say, spend the money on driver education and not this whiz bang electronic crap which BTW incorporates point to point radar just waiting to be phased in.

I would still prefer to see actual police enforce all our laws instead of fancy cameras. Why? Police are able to take into account the fact that shit happens in life and there will always be variables and circumstances that can't be taken into account by a computer that takes not much more than a picture and then decides upon 2 outcomes. Black or white, ticket or no ticket.

Ie: What happens when at the last second a perth motorist swerves into my lane, because trying to be a safe driver I have left a small gap between myself and the car infront? Sure, a picture will show that my bumper is right on the other persons tail but whos fault is that?

You've got to be joking?

We already have this technology on our 90 stretch to Helltown and yesterday I was in the queue with a front row seat.

We're all crawling along at 70 to 90 so obviously the vehicles start to bunch up. (the Bruce Highway goes from 110 down to 80/90 until 20k's North of Helltown)

Take into account that there are all sorts of cars mixed in with semis of all descriptions, hills, grey nomads so the acceleration/deceleration rates are varied.

Next thing one of these electronic marvels lights up and you guessed it, someone up front panics and touches his brakes.

Nose to tail accidents were narrowly averted but it was a fine dry day so we continued on.

2K's down the road the next electronic marvel lights up warning that we're all speeding and fines/demerit points will be ours. No-one is doing anything near 90 yet again on come the stop lights.

Not only is this technology hopelessly inaccurate, it's road user's money spent in the most appalling fashion and all under the guise of road safety.

I say, spend the money on driver education and not this whiz bang electronic crap which BTW incorporates point to point radar just waiting to be phased in.

pretty sure those boards at the cooroy turn off and near the amamoor turn off are just pressure sensor triggered and not camera operated, so it is slightly different.

Does this mean that the police can be fined when they sit 30cm from your bumper before they pull you over for a "random" inspection to see if your car is dangerously unroadworthy?

wow, they do that in victoria too. standard practice here if they see something or someone they don't like is:

* quickly and needless accelerate and break speed limit if neccessary to close distance between themselves and their 'suspect'

* commence tailgating 'suspect' at a distance of no more than 1/8th of a bees dick off the 'suspects' rear bumper to try and scare them into doing something dangerous

* continue tailgating till they are satisfied. this means either the 'suspect' has panicked and done something wrong, or sufficient time has passed and they are now bored.

* hit lights and sirens and commence 'random breath test' if no offences have been committed

When are they going to implement those speed cameras that detects when a road snail is hogging the right lane on the freeway while driving 20 under the limit?

Yes, I would love to see that. what is it with people in australia who love to form the rolling blockade? and as you come up behind them they look all offended like you are hooning along. in any other country people just get out of your way for a moment, let you pass and then get on with their lives. in australia prepare to spend 10mins stuck behind someone who wants to drive slower than you do and feels the need to enforce their self imposed speed limit onto you for some reason.

I would still prefer to see actual police enforce all our laws instead of fancy cameras. Why? Police are able to take into account the fact that shit happens in life and there will always be variables and circumstances that can't be taken into account by a computer that takes not much more than a picture and then decides upon 2 outcomes. Black or white, ticket or no ticket.

Ie: What happens when at the last second a perth motorist swerves into my lane, because trying to be a safe driver I have left a small gap between myself and the car infront? Sure, a picture will show that my bumper is right on the other persons tail but whos fault is that?

Agree with both those points. and your example is perfectly valid and happens all the time. as soon as you start leaving appropriate gaps between yourself and the car in front you quickly find yourself going backwards as car after car takes this as an invitation to invade your safe braking zone and get into that space.

I am dead against any of these monitoring systems or car mounted gear. it's all bad and all totally unnecessary. It's impact on the road toll is also highly debatable. just like fixed speed camers which also do nothing to help lower the road toll. good roads, safe cars and education lower the road toll. not fining people for doing 53 in a 50 zone.

pretty sure those boards at the cooroy turn off and near the amamoor turn off are just pressure sensor triggered and not camera operated, so it is slightly different.

Yes Marc they're so far wrong I wondered if perhaps they were operated by some kiddie back at HQ.

Ridiculously expensive joke really when the whole lot will soon be bypassed.

As for the right lane snails, that's just driver education, or the lack of. Not checking mirrors, all the usual suspects.

Followed the Army down to Matilda yesterday. They were flat out at around 80 and yet sticking to the right hand overtaking lanes. Checked their vehicles were LHD so there's a legitimate reason and you make allowances.

wow, they do that in victoria too. standard practice here if they see something or someone they don't like is:

* quickly and needless accelerate and break speed limit if neccessary to close distance between themselves and their 'suspect'

* commence tailgating 'suspect' at a distance of no more than 1/8th of a bees dick off the 'suspects' rear bumper to try and scare them into doing something dangerous

* continue tailgating till they are satisfied. this means either the 'suspect' has panicked and done something wrong, or sufficient time has passed and they are now bored.

* hit lights and sirens and commence 'random breath test' if no offences have been committed

Almost everytime I've been pulled over, I've had a cop sit on my ass to do it. Even the reasonable cops who haven't fined me. I understand some "drivers" still haven't heard about this milennia old invention we have called reflective surfaces, i.e. mirrors...but for those who do use them, surely a safe couple of metres away would suffice at first. I just don't see the point to enforcing law and breaking it at the same time. If you're going to nab me on something petty like a few km over or the suspicion that my car is unroadworthy then don't do worse shit to try and catch me for it. I'm sure on more than one occasion someone has seen the flashing lights, crapped themselves and instinctively stomped on the brakes. They'll wanna be careful if they ever tailgate me in a car worth less than my shirt.

And I don't accept this "police have been trained with special courses blah blah". Okay, can we make these courses available to the public so I too can drive like a f***wit?

/rant

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Howdy friends, So another weird one today, I was looking into replacing some broken clips holding the front grille for the R32 GTR (part number 01553-03831), and noticed the brackets which are supposed to hold the grille in place were also missing 😑. I do recall seeing this issue many years ago, but didn't fix it at the time. A quick look on eBay and I was able to find the genuine brackets, along with all the screws which suited the headlights (part numbers 26042-08U05,26092-08U05). Happy days!....  Once they arrived however there was an extra nut in the packaging which implied that there should also be a bolt or a stud, and sure enough, after a bit of searching I found this thread from 2013, and @Ants clearly shows a stud should be present. Reading around a bit more, it's possible the headlights on my car are the "povo pack" headlights as mentioned by @funkymonkey in this thread way back in 2008. This could explain why the studs are missing on my set of headlights. Looking at the headlight diagram I wasn't able to see a suitable part number for the stud itself. The headlight did indeed have a recess that looked like it would accept a stud, but interestingly no thread or anything obvious how the stud would be affixed to the headlight, I suspect it may have been glued in, press fit, or melted into the plastic at the factory. Another member may be able to clarify if they happen to have a genuine set of N1 headlamps. The only thing we have to work with within the recess is a keyway which likely is there to prevent the stud from rotating within the recess. In any case, back to 3D printing, I put together a model which acts like a pug with a friction fit inside this recess, making use of the keyway so it doesn't rotate while tightening a bolt. Printing in TPU will allow it to slightly swell making a nice snug fit without cracking the part. I've designed the adaptor it to accept an 20 mm M6 bolt (stainless with a cap head in my case), as opposed to the standard M5 stud and I made use of the standard galvanised split washer that came with the genuine brackets from Nissan. Once the bolt and screws were all in place, giving the bracket a gentle shake gave the classic "shaking the car" feeling, very solid, which gives me confidence this is going to be able to hold on much better than the janky solution which seems to have been here for the past decade or so. Overall I'm really pleased with how this turned out and maybe there are more people out there running these headlights without a centre stud at all! Link to the freely available model on Printables: Click here Regards, Sean  
    • Hey everyone, This is my first post apart of the introduction. I tried searching a bit on the forum but couldn't really get a straight answer. I got the car to my mechanic as I felt it being weak. It seems that it was missing on two cylinders due to the injectors. I had all my injectors clean and the car runs much better. The mechanic also confirmed my suspicions that the cat is clogged and needs to be tackled asap. The cat rattles a bit and the hot exhaust warning frequently lights up when driving after getting the injectors clean. In my introduction I was asked about what modification I might be interested in and mentioned a cat delete. From what I was told, this is not really beneficial on the RB20DE and there are more cons than pros.  Could perhaps anyone give some suggestions on what the best course of action would be since the current cat is toast and needs to be removed/replaced anyway? I can also sometimes smell a strong smell of fuel, but I'm not sure if this is related.
    • Hope the cans went down well at least 
    • 255 can't go wrong with the price.
    • When I was replacing my pump due to being stranded in the wrong state, I went with the Deatschwerks 320lph kit. It is a direct plug in to the stock wires, harness, everything. It comes with a plug... but you can plug the OEM plug directly into this thing. https://justjap.com/products/deatschwerks-dw300-fuel-pump-nissan-s13-silvia-r32-r33-r34-skyline-c34-stagea?currency=AUD Downside: Won't actually flow that much on boost if you want to push it on E85, but it's comparable to the 040/255 etc. Little more actually.
×
×
  • Create New...