Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looks like the ASSET-Cam will be most constructive Craig.

I wonder about two things...

a) how strongly and vigorously an offender will try to get off a charge and...

b) how accurate the system is and how reliable the calibration will be.

Good find. :D

Looks like the ASSET-Cam will be most constructive Craig.

I wonder about two things...

a) how strongly and vigorously an offender will try to get off a charge and...

b) how accurate the system is and how reliable the calibration will be.

Good find. :D

I agree - especially when you consider that drivers will need to be able to judge how close they can approach another car without having to worry about getting a ticket.. but I'm guessing that you have to be driving very close/dangerously to be getting a ticket.

Does this mean that the police can be fined when they sit 30cm from your bumper before they pull you over for a "random" inspection to see if your car is dangerously unroadworthy?

Should have it detect police that park illegally to get some lunch or whatever..

or those police bikes during peak traffic illegally driving on the highway between cars.. has anyone else (in sth east qld) noticed how many of them are doing this during peak hour on the M1

You've got to be joking?

We already have this technology on our 90 stretch to Helltown and yesterday I was in the queue with a front row seat.

We're all crawling along at 70 to 90 so obviously the vehicles start to bunch up. (the Bruce Highway goes from 110 down to 80/90 until 20k's North of Helltown)

Take into account that there are all sorts of cars mixed in with semis of all descriptions, hills, grey nomads so the acceleration/deceleration rates are varied.

Next thing one of these electronic marvels lights up and you guessed it, someone up front panics and touches his brakes.

Nose to tail accidents were narrowly averted but it was a fine dry day so we continued on.

2K's down the road the next electronic marvel lights up warning that we're all speeding and fines/demerit points will be ours. No-one is doing anything near 90 yet again on come the stop lights.

Not only is this technology hopelessly inaccurate, it's road user's money spent in the most appalling fashion and all under the guise of road safety.

I say, spend the money on driver education and not this whiz bang electronic crap which BTW incorporates point to point radar just waiting to be phased in.

I would still prefer to see actual police enforce all our laws instead of fancy cameras. Why? Police are able to take into account the fact that shit happens in life and there will always be variables and circumstances that can't be taken into account by a computer that takes not much more than a picture and then decides upon 2 outcomes. Black or white, ticket or no ticket.

Ie: What happens when at the last second a perth motorist swerves into my lane, because trying to be a safe driver I have left a small gap between myself and the car infront? Sure, a picture will show that my bumper is right on the other persons tail but whos fault is that?

You've got to be joking?

We already have this technology on our 90 stretch to Helltown and yesterday I was in the queue with a front row seat.

We're all crawling along at 70 to 90 so obviously the vehicles start to bunch up. (the Bruce Highway goes from 110 down to 80/90 until 20k's North of Helltown)

Take into account that there are all sorts of cars mixed in with semis of all descriptions, hills, grey nomads so the acceleration/deceleration rates are varied.

Next thing one of these electronic marvels lights up and you guessed it, someone up front panics and touches his brakes.

Nose to tail accidents were narrowly averted but it was a fine dry day so we continued on.

2K's down the road the next electronic marvel lights up warning that we're all speeding and fines/demerit points will be ours. No-one is doing anything near 90 yet again on come the stop lights.

Not only is this technology hopelessly inaccurate, it's road user's money spent in the most appalling fashion and all under the guise of road safety.

I say, spend the money on driver education and not this whiz bang electronic crap which BTW incorporates point to point radar just waiting to be phased in.

pretty sure those boards at the cooroy turn off and near the amamoor turn off are just pressure sensor triggered and not camera operated, so it is slightly different.

Does this mean that the police can be fined when they sit 30cm from your bumper before they pull you over for a "random" inspection to see if your car is dangerously unroadworthy?

wow, they do that in victoria too. standard practice here if they see something or someone they don't like is:

* quickly and needless accelerate and break speed limit if neccessary to close distance between themselves and their 'suspect'

* commence tailgating 'suspect' at a distance of no more than 1/8th of a bees dick off the 'suspects' rear bumper to try and scare them into doing something dangerous

* continue tailgating till they are satisfied. this means either the 'suspect' has panicked and done something wrong, or sufficient time has passed and they are now bored.

* hit lights and sirens and commence 'random breath test' if no offences have been committed

When are they going to implement those speed cameras that detects when a road snail is hogging the right lane on the freeway while driving 20 under the limit?

Yes, I would love to see that. what is it with people in australia who love to form the rolling blockade? and as you come up behind them they look all offended like you are hooning along. in any other country people just get out of your way for a moment, let you pass and then get on with their lives. in australia prepare to spend 10mins stuck behind someone who wants to drive slower than you do and feels the need to enforce their self imposed speed limit onto you for some reason.

I would still prefer to see actual police enforce all our laws instead of fancy cameras. Why? Police are able to take into account the fact that shit happens in life and there will always be variables and circumstances that can't be taken into account by a computer that takes not much more than a picture and then decides upon 2 outcomes. Black or white, ticket or no ticket.

Ie: What happens when at the last second a perth motorist swerves into my lane, because trying to be a safe driver I have left a small gap between myself and the car infront? Sure, a picture will show that my bumper is right on the other persons tail but whos fault is that?

Agree with both those points. and your example is perfectly valid and happens all the time. as soon as you start leaving appropriate gaps between yourself and the car in front you quickly find yourself going backwards as car after car takes this as an invitation to invade your safe braking zone and get into that space.

I am dead against any of these monitoring systems or car mounted gear. it's all bad and all totally unnecessary. It's impact on the road toll is also highly debatable. just like fixed speed camers which also do nothing to help lower the road toll. good roads, safe cars and education lower the road toll. not fining people for doing 53 in a 50 zone.

pretty sure those boards at the cooroy turn off and near the amamoor turn off are just pressure sensor triggered and not camera operated, so it is slightly different.

Yes Marc they're so far wrong I wondered if perhaps they were operated by some kiddie back at HQ.

Ridiculously expensive joke really when the whole lot will soon be bypassed.

As for the right lane snails, that's just driver education, or the lack of. Not checking mirrors, all the usual suspects.

Followed the Army down to Matilda yesterday. They were flat out at around 80 and yet sticking to the right hand overtaking lanes. Checked their vehicles were LHD so there's a legitimate reason and you make allowances.

wow, they do that in victoria too. standard practice here if they see something or someone they don't like is:

* quickly and needless accelerate and break speed limit if neccessary to close distance between themselves and their 'suspect'

* commence tailgating 'suspect' at a distance of no more than 1/8th of a bees dick off the 'suspects' rear bumper to try and scare them into doing something dangerous

* continue tailgating till they are satisfied. this means either the 'suspect' has panicked and done something wrong, or sufficient time has passed and they are now bored.

* hit lights and sirens and commence 'random breath test' if no offences have been committed

Almost everytime I've been pulled over, I've had a cop sit on my ass to do it. Even the reasonable cops who haven't fined me. I understand some "drivers" still haven't heard about this milennia old invention we have called reflective surfaces, i.e. mirrors...but for those who do use them, surely a safe couple of metres away would suffice at first. I just don't see the point to enforcing law and breaking it at the same time. If you're going to nab me on something petty like a few km over or the suspicion that my car is unroadworthy then don't do worse shit to try and catch me for it. I'm sure on more than one occasion someone has seen the flashing lights, crapped themselves and instinctively stomped on the brakes. They'll wanna be careful if they ever tailgate me in a car worth less than my shirt.

And I don't accept this "police have been trained with special courses blah blah". Okay, can we make these courses available to the public so I too can drive like a f***wit?

/rant

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I can also smell fuel in oil if that helps. 
    • Hello, after engine rebuild(new cylinder liners and piston rings, arp headstuds, metal cometic tripple layer gasket, all new main/rod bearings) and roughly 100km made I did measure compression and it’s (1-6) - 80, 60, 90, 120, 110, 135. It’s rb25det series 1 - hydraulic lifters. Measured on cold engine. Didn’t check on hot due to overall car problems such as broken 3rd gear, idle issues, misfire etc. I did smoke test only on 2nd and 5th cylinder bcs soldering iron used with this method broke itself. So after setting cams to side - side 90 left/right angle I can see smoke coming off from intake manifold and turbo exhaust flange. 5th didn’t notice any smoke. Shop did head, valve etc job but I assemble it by myself. So I thinking about lifters. I don’t remember if they were soft or not it was long time ago. In my opinion I didn’t bleed them and they can be opened more than they should be. Can it be more likely possible? Or timing can be off by 1 teeth and can cause such weird compression? But if timing would be out wouldn’t it be like such big difference across all cylinders? Please help I’m so sad it happened. 
    • Hey, yeah I really like the color. Only paint I'd rather have is KN6, but those are expensive. Right now I'm trying to get the car to the point where I can get it tuned to 370hp so the whole setup can be driven legally, and pass the next inspection that is already due anyway. Beyond that lots of rust fixing I'm afraid, winter project is most likely going to be a front end teardown and fixing the strut tower rust. I know these can be driven daily but I don't think I will do so anytime soon. Will post a build thread soon with a list of issues and futute plans.   Cheers
    • Wanted to reply to this topic. I'm in the somewhat same boat with our Stagea. I'm trying to install a different rear diff. The Stagea/Skyline uses mounts on top of the rear diff for the ATTESA pump. Any way you can relocate the pump? I did find this kit https://theskylineshed.com/products/nissan-oem-attesa-mounting-kit-to-suit-r32-r33-r34
    • So here's the deal, my wife picked up an S2 AWD Stagea. Super cool, clean car. Looks like the owner in Japan went track spec as it's got some heavy modifications including Exedy twin disk, tension rods, coilovers, GTR brakes, oil cooler & a Nismo 2 way rear diff. Now, cool mods for sure. But, she is just using this as a casual daily driver. The 2 way rear is AGGRESSIVE. It also has solid subframe bushings & poly diff bushings. So that doesn't help either. So far I've tried changing the diff fluid to the correct fluid. Even tried a little friction modifier. No help. This thing clunks, skips the tires & has some slight whine/NVH when driving. Might sound like I'm being picky, but just trying to find a better solution. Here in the states, it's impossible to find a Stagea rear diff. No luck. I do have a 300zx non-turbo diff. Same ratio, 5 bolt axles. On the Stagea, you need both front & rear diff ratios to match. This car is a 4.083. I'd like to just swap a normal rear diff into this thing. Nothing fancy. Even open diff is fine. She's not tracking the car LOL The difference is that the ATTESA pump mounts to the top of the rear diff. There are 3 total mounting points for the pump on top of the diff. With all this being said, what would be the best way to go about this? I could remove the Stagea diff & see if I could get somebody to possibly weld the 3 tabs/mounting points onto the 300zx diff so we could mount the pump on the 300zx diff. I could swap the internals from the 300zx into the Stagea diff but this is not in my comfort zone. Is it possible to mount the ATTESA pump to the underside of the car? Sorry for the paragraph. Just trying to figure out how to go about this. Any help is much appreciated! Stagea Differential - Note two top tabs, one bolt hole for ATTESA pump mounting   300zx Diff - No mounting tabs Also found this mounting kit ?? https://theskylineshed.com/products/nissan-oem-attesa-mounting-kit-to-suit-r32-r33-r34  
×
×
  • Create New...