Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • chaos

    7164

  • Ska

    5791

  • BelGarion

    3645

  • Nexus9

    3590

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.mrcontrols.com/images/badblock1.jpg

http://www.mrcontrols.com/images/badblock2.jpg

http://www.mrcontrols.com/images/badblock3.jpg

A while back we saw a block failure at the ~700rwhp level on Chemvolt's engine. Here is another failure from toymanf's engine. This engine was doing it's first competitive 1/4 mile run.

Toymanf is not sure how much power he was making on the run, but the dyno he was on while getting the engine set up gave 540rwhp on turbo only (all subsequent runs were done with the tires spinning on the dyno) and the 1/4 mile run on which the engine failed was running that plus a 200 shot of nitrous.

The tune was conservative and you can see that there are no signs of detonation on the piston or cylinder walls. EGT temps were fine. AFRs were in the 11s. Fuel was C16.

The block was a seasoned stock block, bored 40 over. A 1.6mm HKS headgasket held down with ARP studs torqued to 65ft/lbs. It appears that the corner of the block around the #1 cylinder was unable to hold the lifting force that the head was putting on it.

There was at least another 100rwhp left untapped in this engine, but it is unclear at this point if the 3s block is capable of holding that much power over the 1/4 mile.

Any thoughts on how to contain +700rwhp power levels and keep the block intact? Sleeves would not have helped here. I've heard of using 1/2" studs but that is going to require a lot of work and I'm not sure if there is enough material in the block to make that work. Would the 5s block more reliably accept this much power and more?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah it factory manual not sure about ratio but it looks like there’s been some work at the rear 
    • so I need a new speedo cable 
    • Throwing my spoon to the soup here a bit.  When I installed a 044 back in 2012, along with the direct power mod, the car became very difficult to start. To a point I burned one starter motor as I was late for work and tried to get the thing going. With some tuning and careful use of gas pedal when cranking it became bearable. Trying to make this short as possible, but the 044 died after 2-3 years, after which I went with an AEM 320lph pump, which also died after about 4 years to my dismay. After that I went with a Nismo pump, and while trying diagnose an emissions problem, I noticed for the first time that my fuel pressure was 5bar/72psi on idle, and that removing the vacuum line did nothing. After monitoring the situation, and removing the direct power feed and going back to FPCM in attempts to remedy it, I noticed there was fuel in the pressure regulator vac line. Kept the FPCM, installed AEM external regu and the car became sooo much better in every way, including starting. And I had driven it like it was for 11 years.. Anyway, I agree these are likely two different problems, and the FP problem you just haven't noticed before. I do not know much about haltecs, but what first came to mind was the CAS, which probably is not there any more. So how is the wiring from haltec to gauge cluster? How is the battery voltage and alternator?
    • Your car was auto before? You have different diff ratio (auto vs manual i think? or n/a and turbo?)
    • +1 for getting a screen off alibaba, CarPlay/Android Auto is vastly better than whatever navigation cars had 10 years ago. I got an Android screen for my 2015 BMW, huge difference. Fully compatible with factory stuff including iDrive controls.
×
×
  • Create New...