Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks for all the info. Good read. Sounds like I may as well stick with the GT25/30 for now. Like I said I don't have any problems with it at the top end.

Are there any decent twin-turbo SR20s around? Would there be any significant gains in response/low end? Or more hassle than it's worth?

Edit: To the above, I have no preference to brand; are there any good rivals in the low end response catagory?

Edited by Nissinja
Also that GT2860RS is virtually the same as a 2530 but is compressor wheel is a slightly more modern design .

In an effort to utilize an existing thread;

I am considering running 2 x 2860RS discos on my 1JZ

I am confined to my .48 AR turbine housings however wont have much hassle going to a better compressor housing (oem housings are .30 AR for compressor).

I am thinking of using the native .60 t04 cover off the disco itself, however fear it may create an inbalance with the turbine housing. Alternatively I was thinking of machining a set of 2560 covers on (still .60 AR).

While we are on the topic of SR20 based turbos, what are some opinions on the above?

I am figuring seeing as 2530s have an outright flow of say 450rwkw in max tune, perhaps the right comp cover in my .48 housings would yield a potential within 100rwkw difference? I am assuming the compressor cover will be the deal breaker.

Thanks for all the info. Good read. Sounds like I may as well stick with the GT25/30 for now. Like I said I don't have any problems with it at the top end.

Are there any decent twin-turbo SR20s around? Would there be any significant gains in response/low end? Or more hassle than it's worth?

Edit: To the above, I have no preference to brand; are there any good rivals in the low end response catagory?

zero low end and response with a twin :) i had a twin sr20 (tdo4's) on display in my old autobarn shop in sa for a few years

Well GT2530s have always had 0.64 A/R GT28 based turbine housings and I pretty sure a variation of a T04B sized compressor housing , the way to tell is to see of the comp housing has and adapter ring between the bearing housing and the comp housing . If the comp housing is held in by the circlip directly on the back of the comp housing its smaller .

For OE RB26 sized housings possibly 34GTR GT2556R's or 707160-9/GTSS turbos should be more responsive .

I'd have thought a single turbo conversion on a 1JZ would be simpler , much simpler that the sequential turbos I thought those engines had . Maybe look at the new BW range for something suitable .

I can't see any advantage of parallel twins on an inline four , You'd need to have one feed off cylinders 1-4 and the other off 2-3 so one would be on top of the other in a plumbing nightmare . I reckon you could do better with a custom manifold and an Evo X specific TS TIW GT3076R .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah no bearings, just slip fit.  Would be a reasonably challenging but not impossible job to modify it to run bearings but I'm hoping that's not necessary as I may have well built one myself if I end up spending hours modifying it!
    • Brumbys with good shells are bloody expensive, I've looked at 2 "cheaper" cars, and walked away from both,  plus after some research spare parts are fairly sparce I'm starting to think that I missed the boat on finding a clean one that is straight (ish) and without alot rust I'm starting to think about a old Hilux as panels and other parts are much more available as they sold tens of thousands of them I use to be indecisive but now I'm not sure
    • A Brumby would probably fit a big metal toolbox in the back... this is how it begins  
    • Picked up a new OEM boot seal for the MX5 today as the old one got ripped a bit by me being a idiot by seeing if I could fit a large metal tool box in it, it didn't fit, and ripped the seal with the corner of the tool box I am still waiting on time to get the cams and new balancer installed, as well as the repairs to the boot Time will not be an issue soon though
    • I was more thinking so it doesn't flop around as much rather than for rotating it. Once you have the balance right, it should rotate well enough, depending on how much resistance there is on the pivot. I think you said the pivot point was on a bearing though didn't you?
×
×
  • Create New...