Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think the fuel required to support 40psi is a little beyond a street car :D

You'd think so.......considering a top fueller runs around 50 psi....different animal altogether tho'

Edited by juggernaut1

....different animal altogether tho'

snap.

50psi on an 8L motor with so much overlap the dynamic compression is basically nothing vs a 2.5/3L rb would be a different ball game. The top fuelers 50psi is probably 10x as much airflow haha.

snap.

50psi on an 8L motor with so much overlap the dynamic compression is basically nothing vs a 2.5/3L rb would be a different ball game. The top fuelers 50psi is probably 10x as much airflow haha.

Yes the comparison is absurd....around 400psi fuel pressure and around 4 litres of fuel a second consumption.

Edited by juggernaut1

Nah. Going in next Monday for a few days. I've got a few other things I want sorted but I still needed to ask u a couple things. Do u mind if we have a really quick chat after 6pm tommorow? Or no good? Thanks heaps....

any updates?

I'd like to see a garden hose that can flow as much as that top fuel set-up! lol, more like a fire hose! even at idle it's crazy. no wonder they have 6ft flames out the headers....

wheres shifty ?

Here bro.miss me? Lol. Got car back tonight. They put a heavy duty 18psi actuator. Preloaded it etc etc. No difference. I don't think. Dyno shows no difference. In.fact less power at most of the revs. Maybe differ.ent ramp rates etc different temp day. Don't know. Not too happy

Here bro.miss me? Lol. Got car back tonight. They put a heavy duty 18psi actuator. Preloaded it etc etc. No difference. I don't think. Dyno shows no difference. In.fact less power at most of the revs. Maybe differ.ent ramp rates etc different temp day. Don't know. Not too happy

AVO or Status?

Here bro.miss me? Lol. Got car back tonight. They put a heavy duty 18psi actuator. Preloaded it etc etc. No difference. I don't think. Dyno shows no difference. In.fact less power at most of the revs. Maybe differ.ent ramp rates etc different temp day. Don't know. Not too happy

Ignore the dyno, of course it will be different, what matters is how does it drive?

Here bro.miss me? Lol. Got car back tonight. They put a heavy duty 18psi actuator. Preloaded it etc etc. No difference. I don't think. Dyno shows no difference. In.fact less power at most of the revs. Maybe different ramp rates etc different temp day. Don't know. Not too happy

yeah man, was wondering what happened to you..should have my car back soon we can go for a drive and see whos cars the slowest :rofl:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...