Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The response won't change much, if anything was going to improve it'll build more aggressively from 10psi up to full boost from 3000ish rpm - thats what I found with mine. Did you ever post your dyno plot from Status?

The response won't change much, if anything was going to improve it'll build more aggressively from 10psi up to full boost from 3000ish rpm - thats what I found with mine. Did you ever post your dyno plot from Status?

Hmmm. Interesting. No I didn't.

Any thoughts on changing to a .63 hotside.

With a .63 you would need a large external to bypass enough exhaust or you wont make the power. Its too small imo which would cause massive pressure to build in the manifold and less energy to spin the turbine. I would say .82 is perfect for the GTX3076, if not the 1.06. You have another issue I think.

Want to swap? I have the GTX3071 and want to upgrade... :)

Any thoughts on changing to a .63 hotside.

On a GTX3076R? No way. If its laggier than you want to live with, and you can't find anything wrong persay - I'd say you're better off changing the whole turbo. How much are you willing to spend to get it right?

On a GTX3076R? No way. If its laggier than you want to live with, and you can't find anything wrong persay - I'd say you're better off changing the whole turbo. How much are you willing to spend to get it right?

I may have the option to.change fairly cost.effectively. why?

Yep, if I can offload this setup as a kit with a .82 Tial rear I will upgrade to the GTX3076, keep the 1.06 rear and make another set of pipes/adapters up. I have a fair bit of interest already for kits if I want to jig them up but i'm not set up for production runs.

I have been giving the 71 a hiding to iron out any issues it may have long term. The only problem found so far is the V-band didn't hold tight and allowed the turbo to twist, rubbing the compressor housing on the chassis rail around corners. I tightened it right up this time but if it moves again I might just weld the adapters onto the rear housing.

  • 1 month later...

Anyone fitted a GTX35 to a 3L capacity RB yet? If so how does it compare to a regular GT35? I'm trying to toss up whether its worth spending the extra $500 - $600 on the GTX

Currently running a .96 T04Z on my single cammer and not overly impressed with the repsonse. Without the transbrake its pretty much useless at the track. I certainly regret selling the 1.06 GT35 I previously had on the motor

Edited by PSI086

Why? An old school GT35 is cheaper and there is no evidence that the 76mm GTX wheel is any better.

I meant more appropriate than a gtx35 if he was set on a gtx turbo.

Edited by Rolls

Aiming for a minimum of 320rwkw on 98 through the auto and big converter. Previously made 321rwkw and ran 10.7 @ 127mph with my old GT35 set up. The GTX30 would be too small on the 3L I reacon. I'd eventually like to screw about 30psi into it with an E85 tune. Theres guys making close to 400rwkw with a GT35 so is the GTX going to be that much better?

I meant more appropriate than a gtx35 if he was set on a gtx turbo.

To small for a Rb30, even with a very conservative cam grind Rb30's swallow a f**k load more air than a pissy Rb25

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Aiming for a minimum of 320rwkw on 98 through the auto and big converter. Previously made 321rwkw and ran 10.7 @ 127mph with my old GT35 set up. The GTX30 would be too small on the 3L I reacon. I'd eventually like to screw about 30psi into it with an E85 tune. Theres guys making close to 400rwkw with a GT35 so is the GTX going to be that much better?

Ryan,

Being your not short of a dollar, you could buy the gtx35 and show some real world results in comparison to the g35

( insert smiley emoticon here : ). , damn I phone)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...