Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

To add to that, I'm warming to the GTX3584RS - it looks like the 1.22 housing is enough, and as I suggested the other day it looked like the 1.01 may not be too bad for what you're looking for either.  Looking forward to seeing results!

  • Like 1

Yep agree with you on all counts mate ?? Your calculations match what I come with each time I've run the numbers on the GTX3584RS and the others you listed. 
Garrett actually quote between 9.5 & 10.5 hp per lbs/min. But I have wondered if that's a conservative estimate with the newer generation options. 

It will be interesting to see how the 1.21 housing goes power vs response on a 3-4L six. Won't have to wait long as there's a couple of local 2JZ builds coming online reasonable soon.

In other news...

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

  • Like 1

Comp housing is about to head off for polishing (GARRETT logo will remain [but polished] as a feature) and the ex housing for ceramic coating. 

I'm a little bit excited with my new toy ?

All three, at least in comparison to the Gen 1 GTX3582.
Blade pitch and profile has changed, especially the leading and trailing edge, and 9 blade vs 10 of the Gen 1 (correct me if I'm wrong) The blades are noticeably thinner at the blade root.
I'm far from an expert (my background is more jet engine based) but it appears the Garrett /Honeywell R&D focused on reducing mass to improve or maintain spool whilst altering the blade profile to achieve the claimed additional flow.

  • Like 1

Ha-ha. It was the best I could come up with at the time. The plug was sitting on the desk... I thought 'yeah most people have a rough idea of the size of a NGK plug box'.  

A mate that is pretty handy at building modified turbocharged engines had a look at the turbine and noted they've reduced the material in the webbing between the blades and moved the bulk of the blade towards the centre in an effort to reduce rotational mass.   

On ‎14‎/‎01‎/‎2017 at 8:38 PM, whatsisname said:

ETS hold the R35 drag ET world record (7.09 @ 209). Hopefully the GTX3584RS car runs some numbers at the drag strip to back up the dyno figure

That should read 7.01 @ 209

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm so far relatively impressed with the Gen2 GTX3582R, met a lad with one on his fresh RB26 build at a track day I was at on Monday - running a 1.01a/r twin scroll T3 hotside on BP98.  I don't have much info on it, but I did see a dyno plot at the track and it was near 200kw by 4000rpm and made 460kw @ rear hubs (I'd call that around 410rwkw if you can't understand hub dynos) on 21psi.  It had a beautiful power curve for that level, with peak coming in at just after 7000rpm but holding >450kw all the way up to the 8000rpm they ran it to.

It seems like Garrett may have managed to go to a 66mm inducer without sacrificing too much in the way of response, and clearly have managed to do very good things for flow.  The car had quite a happy wee anti-surge whistle too, a bit less low-key than the Gen1 GTX - I have a soft spot for that noise so a good thing in my books haha.  

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Lithium said:

I'm so far relatively impressed with the Gen2 GTX3582R, met a lad with one on his fresh RB26 build at a track day I was at on Monday - running a 1.01a/r twin scroll T3 hotside on BP98.  I don't have much info on it, but I did see a dyno plot at the track and it was near 200kw by 4000rpm and made 460kw @ rear hubs (I'd call that around 410rwkw if you can't understand hub dynos) on 21psi.  It had a beautiful power curve for that level, with peak coming in at just after 7000rpm but holding >450kw all the way up to the 8000rpm they ran it to.

It seems like Garrett may have managed to go to a 66mm inducer without sacrificing too much in the way of response, and clearly have managed to do very good things for flow.  The car had quite a happy wee anti-surge whistle too, a bit less low-key than the Gen1 GTX - I have a soft spot for that noise so a good thing in my books haha.  

Nice been eager on results.

200rwkw by 4,000rpm is unheard of in a 35xx turbo. normally ud see that in a gtx3071/3076

 

Pat aka Rekin should also have results from a Gen 2 GTX3071 internal gate on a Rb25neo in the coming months

On 2/1/2017 at 8:30 AM, blah_blah said:

Nice been eager on results.

200rwkw by 4,000rpm is unheard of in a 35xx turbo. normally ud see that in a gtx3071/3076

 

Pat aka Rekin should also have results from a Gen 2 GTX3071 internal gate on a Rb25neo in the coming months

Copy+Paste from my Build thread: 

 

I am proud to share my latest purchase from GCG Turbochargers - A Garrett GTX3071r Gen2 T3 internal wastegate 0.82 low-mount RB setup.
With the GenII only released 3 months ago this is the first low-mount RB setup to pass through GCG Turbochargers & onto me :D

Big shout-out to GCG Turbochargers for responding to my endless FB messages after hours & helping me choose the right setup for my application.
Not only that, but the turn-around from Order to Dispatch was a matter of weeks when other distributors were quoting 3 month lead-times.
In addition,with GCG Turbochargers expertise in building turbos, they added a few extra tweaks to the build to aid boost control & overall flow.

GCG Turbochargers supplied in a RB25 low-mount kit; with all gaskets, bolts, studs, manifold spacer, braided lines, actuator, extra cheese - hold the mayo.
And to top it off, they been kind enough to send through some build photos :D

16491449_1261916157207078_627300090_o.jpg

16466696_1261915563873804_1715842685_o.jpg

16465988_1261915997207094_565881718_o.jpg

  • Like 2

+1, will be very interested to see how it performs in practice.  This is potentially a REALLY good choice for an RB25, especially if you have some other nice supporting tweaks to the car :)   What supporting mods, and fuel will it have?

+1, will be very interested to see how it performs in practice.  This is potentially a REALLY good choice for an RB25, especially if you have some other nice supporting tweaks to the car [emoji4]   What supporting mods, and fuel will it have?

Forged rebuilt Neo engine with an e85 setup - is the plan!
16 hours ago, MattSR said:

So, does anyone have any results from a single GT3584RS on an RB26 yet?

 

 

I wouldn't hold my breath, @whatsisname is one of only about 3/4 people I've seen any indication of using one for ANY car in the world right now and he has been really quiet so it's hard to know how long his build will be, this kind of thing often can take ages from the point the turbo arrives but will let him comment when he shows up :)   

It's very early days from the turbo release and Borg Warner and Precision turbos are ultimately more known and desired in a lot of ways - and the Garrett is actually the more expensive option to a degree so they may not become very popular unless the results come out well.  I have to say, I'm pretty impressed by the Gen2 GTX3582R which has a 66/82 compressor instead of 67/84.... as it turns out @whatsisname's decision to take an early punt could pay off as on paper it looks like his setup could be one of the perfect matches to what it wants, so potentially could make for a very good result.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So my R32 GTST has been sitting around at my old mum and dad's place for a few years now...and it's time to bring it home. Main issue I have is that she hasn't been started in about 5 years or so, so I'm not too keen on just kicking it over and hoping that RB20 reputation for being un-killlable extends to long periods of neglect. My plan is to get it running there so I can move it around,  then get it towed back to my place where I can start working on it properly. The old folks driveway is a bad place to start a project like that. I'm getting old too and also haven't stuffed around with cars since forever, so kinda learning this stuff again. So far I've siphoned out all the shitty old fuel and topped up the coolant (thought it was fully dry but took 2 litres to fill the radiator). Planning on hitting the rusty rotors with some brake cleaner in case the tow truck driver gets a bit gung ho loading it up. As far as oil, it's got plenty although it's now dark in colour and obviously needs a change sooner rather than later. Was doing some YouTube research and was planning to hand-crank the motor from the harmonic balancer with a 37mm socket and breaker bar, removing the spark plugs and spraying some "fogging oil" in the holes but there's not much room to get in there with the radiator fan right up against it. Jacking the car up takes too long and I can't leave it half done between visits. So now I'm was thinking of cranking a few times it using the starter (removing plugs and spraying oil first). Reckon there's any chance it will do more damage that way if something's stuck inside the motor? Should I really change all fluids completely before I go any further? Grateful for any other advice you guys have to get her going safely too.      
    • Well, that's just wierd. Amongst a string of seemingly benign introduction and request for help threads, we have this one with a link.... to another, unrelated thread inside this forum. Colour me suspicious.
    • Sorry to say, I think that is a pretty long shot on this forum.....
    • sorry, "info" from Lumley here: https://www.lsvcarinsurance.com.au/about-nrma-insurance
    • So it looks like Lumleys are closing other than in Victoria, with the kind offer that another brand from the evil IAG multi-glomerate (NRMA) might offer insurance under their price and conditions if they want to, as an alternative. Lunmleys was good for us because they covered JDM and USDM imports, had 2 car "stable" insurance (ie, insure many cars but max of 2 can be driven at once), covered mods, reasonable overall prices. So, with them gone, who else should I consider? Shannons is last on my list, we used to be insured with them until we found they were helpful at taking premiums but much less helpful at claim time.
×
×
  • Create New...