Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just saw a post on Facebook of another 25T with one of these going on a 25/30 backed up against an auto - should be a couple running around at least in the near future.

Any progress with yours?

  • Like 1

Keep me posted with how that one goes, mate.

Mine is about a week or two away... manifold flange change is done (T3 to v-band) off for ceramic coating tomorrow or Mon.
IMG_7671.JPG

Going to switch from a Sard to Turbosmart FPR1200, may need bigger injectors too. CDI is another 'possible' requirement.

Will also install and configure the Racelogic TC system.

IMG_7630.JPGIMG_7625.JPGIMG_7631.JPG

Previous turbo set-up (up until earlier today) and a few random shots. IMG_7638.JPGIMG_7622.JPG

I think I may have developed a thing for titanium fasteners. $400 and counting so far, fancy blue M10x1.25 strut tops nuts included.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

Nice power!!! Definitely in the range we had talked about earlier.

 

Why no rpm graph?  Hard to tell what spool would be like but the graph makes it look like it could be later than I expected.   Any reason it was stopped at 26psi?

 

 

I got gtx3582 gen2 0.83 a/r ts t3 in r34gtr dyno on 4th gear.

Also plumb back 3.5 inch exhaust.

made 650awhp(480kw) @28psi. 

Response not that good on the graph but I still have 3500rpm power band, and tuner did not touch the cam gear yet. hope I can get better response after adjust the cam gear.

I feel not laggy on road.  But definitely  laggy than my old gtx3576.

With 1.01 a/r rear housing and more boost it should be over 750hp on all 4.

IMG_2128.thumb.JPG.cb8e698b91f95e282cac2c2ab7dd43f5.JPG

  • Like 1
12 hours ago, Lithium said:

Nice power!!! Definitely in the range we had talked about earlier.

 

Why no rpm graph?  Hard to tell what spool would be like but the graph makes it look like it could be later than I expected.   Any reason it was stopped at 26psi?

 

 

Cheers mate. Yeah made the power I was hoping it would. 

That was my stuff up, I forgot to ask Shaun to switch it across to RPM.  We are yet to switch to the 4-port Mac valve so hopefully further improvement in response to come. 

Shaun strongly suggested we leave it at 26psi for reliability and longevity. I wasn't going to argue with my engine builder and tuner. The same guy who will look after me if something goes wrong.. provided I follow his advice :14_relaxed:       

  • Like 1

Makes sense, probably could have gone a bit smaller if you weren't after full effort though.

When do you get to drive it?  Did you get any impression from the dyno or real world what the spool is like?

  • Like 1
5 hours ago, whatsisname said:

True, although this way there's potential for gains down the track.

I'm hopeful we can improve response. Yet to drive it as there's still a few things to do.

Hi mate do you know what the size of your turbo's vband inlet size?

13 hours ago, whatsisname said:

True, although this way there's potential for gains down the track.

I'm hopeful we can improve response. Yet to drive it as there's still a few things to do.

Cool, Good luck!  Cheers for updating with results, if it can make 525kw on 26psi or so the hotside isn't too shabby.  Would be very interesting to know what they can do on kill and what the boost threshold is like, if they aren't too much laggier than the 3582 then they would be a really good thing 

  • Like 1
Cool, Good luck!  Cheers for updating with results, if it can make 525kw on 26psi or so the hotside isn't too shabby.  Would be very interesting to know what they can do on kill and what the boost threshold is like, if they aren't too much laggier than the 3582 then they would be a really good thing 

Thanks mate. No problem at all, always happy to share my experiences, good or bad.   I am confident we can improve the boost curve to get it coming on harder and therefore area under the curve.

Some further info from the dyno session on Wednesday evening; Shaun spent the first 10mins adjusting base pressure and checking the fuel mixtures, as we'd switched from a Sard FPR to new TS FPR1200. Once A/FRs were optimised he did a power run. 421kW at 10psi creeping to 19-20psi. After a quick change of wastegate line configuration and boost control adjustments the second run produced 463kW at about 24psi. At about this point I started getting concerned it wasn't going to produce the goods!  

The next run, with boost set at 25psi, resulted in 488.6kW. Shaun could obviously see the early signs of disappointment starting to show on my face and said to me 'don't give up on me yet mate!' accompanied by a grin. The next run, it made 499.2kW. The gains were all coming from adding timing. GTX3584RS was continuing to make gains where the old FP GT3586R had nosed over at 25-26psi and extra boost and timing simply didn't make any extra power.

Run after run it kept climbing, 503.3, 507.7, 513.X, 525.3kW

I am confident it would keep making gains with additional boost provided the engine doesn't hit a restriction somewhere. 560-580kW at 30-32psi would be my guess. 600 is a possibility with a decent head/cams set-up and everything else optimised and set to kill.

Down the track at some stage I will get to find out.  

   

          

       

   

 

 

There are literally no other engine changes from when it had the 3586. Same everything bar a switch from T3 flange to v-band flange on the exhaust manifold - but same manifold. Same dump, same intake etc.

It is as close to a back-to-back as we could get.

 

I'm guessing hotside.

 

 

  • Like 1
That is quite interesting!  What about the spool difference?   Do you know what rpm it's reaching 20psi by?  What was it before?


As soon as I get a chance I'll get Shaun to overlay the two runs. It's laggier, as I expected. Plus it isn't coming on as hard with the current boost control and w/gate set-up.
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
    • This seems like a pointless exercise. There is no E30 availability. Ongoing availability of E85 should not be assumed. Flex-fuel is the only sensible approach, so you can use E85 when and where you can get it, 98 when that's al you can get, and anything in between as you fill it up and drain it down. And if that means replacing the pumps, fitting a flex capable sensor/ECU/whatever has to be done to these Renault shitboxen, then.....so be it?
    • Sorry, I wasn't very clear.....just that the standard injectors are apparently good over 600rwhp/450rwkw which you won't get to on standard turbos anyway.....they are much better sized from factory than we are used to in RBs.
    • I'm not sure where you are, but United Terrey Hills has E85. 
×
×
  • Create New...