Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys ive got a 94 r32 gtr vspec2 im replacing the clutch with a exedy triple plate, but seems the flywheel is the difference on the exedy site between r32, r33, r34gtr, and the r32 one im trying to put in seems to raised and cannot get the fork in at all even with the gearbox pulled back of the block about 20mm to get the fork in it is touching on the clutch cover,

any help with determining the different flywheels specific for the exedy triple plates would be a great help, also need one asap

cheers Nathan

Id assume a R32 Vspec is the Pull Type set up ( Same as R33 GTR ) Early R32 were Push Type ( You Can see the Bunch of Fingers in the middle no Ring clip

Buttt im Sure if its Depth Problem the R34 Gtr were all Deeper (a wider clutch ) so she will not slide on properly

Tried it same problem Just too much clutch in there and the Gear Box will never match up

Id Suggest you have R34 Triple Plate in your hands and you need to return it and get 33 One

Good Luck

SIR-032

so are you fitting a pull type clutch? im not sure there a differant thickness bearing carriers..

if its a push type.... then you need all the early gtr hardware including a 12mm bearing carrier and bearing (smaller diameter face) available from otomoto..

hi guys cheers for the help ive been talking to tim at exedy, found out the clutch i got was actually for a r34 gtr,

it was out of a r32 gtr with pull type but the gearbox was a r34 gtr item, which i wasnt aware of

so i now have forsale a r34 gtr exedy triple plate and flywheel, done 2500kms use barely used, will be puting it forsale in the forum

regards Nathan

Nathan,

can you supply the part number of the kit you have, if so I'll be able to give you a few details.

hi andrew,

im very interested in the exedy hyper twin you offered me can you possibly give me a call about it on 0431278617 or send me some more info to my email adress as i cant reply on here to [email protected]

regards Nathan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
    • Hi...a little refresh. Is Nistune gonna be enough to run BoV? Or do i need some proper ECU? 
    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
    • Such a shame places like Amaroo Park have been redeveloped, smaller tracks always make for good racing. Cheers for sharing @PranK there's some good Lakeside video's too. Its so hard with older the cars as parts are so rare and everything was made for a particular chassis at that point in time. Even the V8 Supercar Blueprint era cars are all different between each chassis within a team as they learnt things and made improvements. The COTF cars between each Chassis builder is different too especially motor/oil systems/intakes. The Group A stuff is worth so much too especially chassis with good history. The only way to do it would be composite panels and similar engine drivelines to the original cars. Ford sierra running Focus RS driveline, Commodore running a short stroke LS/LT or a Falcon with coyote and a H Pattern dog box. Could use a standard ecu across all models with a Torque Map and DBW for parity which is not even used in Supercars currently. Hell a TCM is almost a full chassis car these days and the suspension is not even close to standard style in the front running cars.  
×
×
  • Create New...