Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^ umm you dont know senna very well do ya :]

Never said he was a saint. Though I wish I'd grown up watching senna drive i was too young then to appreciate it. I have seen that video many times though, and that looks a whole lot more like a racing incident than Hungary last year. He was an aggressive driver, but IMO quite different to Schumacher.

Maybe I'm seeing it differently, but schumacher and senna are very different drivers to me, even when they cause crashes.

Also, damn the cars were flimsy then.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgWMec_MmMM

Edited by Galois

Its not that anyone was a more skilled driver, or who punted who of a track whenever

Senna was just better to watch

It is much of the reason why i have grown to really appreciate Hamilton. These guys really know how to make it interesting. Its something guys like Button, Massa, Kimi, Hill, Prost, Mansell... even Alonso i suppose... didnt/dont have.

Theses guys are all great to have in the sport and its sad when they leave. They all bring something different and exciting to race weekends, but its guys like Senna that you everybody really remembers

Agreed. Well said.

Maybe F1 needs to limit down force to that of the 80's cars so we can really see who the better drivers are these days.

*imagines Kobayashi with less grip*

There is a big difference between them, Senna never pushed anyone into a wall at near 200 mph like schumacher did last year.

Also never seen schumacher do this.

These days he'd probably be banned from the sport for endangering a life or something ridiculous like that if he stopped on the track and got out of his car...

The videos Ivan posted clearly show him driving straight into his championship contender into turn 1 on the opening lap, in order to take him out of the race and win the championship...That's in cars a shit load less safer than they are these days... Hamilton himself said you could almost elbow through the cockpit, so I'd say a car ramming into it at any speed would be life threatening.

^ umm you dont know senna very well do ya :]

It's ok when Senna does it mate, pull your head in...

Also, damn the cars were flimsy then.

You said it...

These days he'd probably be banned from the sport for endangering a life or something ridiculous like that if he stopped on the track and got out of his car...

The videos Ivan posted clearly show him driving straight into his championship contender into turn 1 on the opening lap, in order to take him out of the race and win the championship...That's in cars a shit load less safer than they are these days... Hamilton himself said you could almost elbow through the cockpit, so I'd say a car ramming into it at any speed would be life threatening.

Once he'd committed to the gap there wasn't much he could do, Senna had 2 wheels off the track trying to avoid the contact, which combined with getting air on the ripple strip made lose steering. All I've been saying is that, in my opinion, that's a more justified racing incident than what schumacher did, and the two drivers are very different. Some people will always say there is no justification for a crash or a close call, others say that it's just part of racing and the drivers' personalities. The worst of senna's behaviour is slightly comparable to the better of schumacher's controversial moves.

Also when senna pulled over to help a fellow racer it was a more dangerous time, when people died more often. There was a big steam/smoke signal to slow drivers down and senna was hardly parked in the middle of the track. It doesn't look like there was anything but safety dictating his actions.

People's opinions will always vary on this, and have since 1990.

For the record I do think schumacher is a good driver and that many of his victories were great drives, I also think he has done some brutal and shifty things on track that few other drivers would even contemplate, and that any decent driver given #1 status with ferrari from 2000-2004 had a great chance at championship wins.

Meh to each their own

Edited by Galois

I was never a Schumi fan but I think that comment about 2000-2004 is taking quite a lot away from him and his hard work and technical feedback. He was far and away the number one driver in the sport behind the scenes in that time. The reason Ferrari dominated like that was because they were able to spend more money and have Schumi develop the car alongside Ross Brawn and his other staff that moved with him from Benetton.

Its not that anyone was a more skilled driver, or who punted who of a track whenever

Senna was just better to watch

It is much of the reason why i have grown to really appreciate Hamilton. These guys really know how to make it interesting. Its something guys like Button, Massa, Kimi, Hill, Prost, Mansell... even Alonso i suppose... didnt/dont have.

Theses guys are all great to have in the sport and its sad when they leave. They all bring something different and exciting to race weekends, but its guys like Senna that you everybody really remembers

I think the cars back then were generally more exciting to watch

I was never a Schumi fan but I think that comment about 2000-2004 is taking quite a lot away from him and his hard work and technical feedback. He was far and away the number one driver in the sport behind the scenes in that time. The reason Ferrari dominated like that was because they were able to spend more money and have Schumi develop the car alongside Ross Brawn and his other staff that moved with him from Benetton.

Note the key point there.

So Senna would never run anyone at the pit wall? This video also shows a sharp contrast to how "unavoidable" the previous Senna Prost turn 1 collision was and how fair Senna's driving was...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zznJjSncGCE

bah, everyone remembers and glorifies Senna because the media does, and has been beating it into them for the past 17years. End of story.

mix that with the nostalgia of the 'good ol days' and he's gone from someone known during his career as a fierce rival for Prost and who really only beat Prost because he'd either crash into him or slam the door to make Prost avoid a crash, to some sort of martyred F1 saint.

Edited by hrd-hr30

Note the key point there.

yeah no one else in F1 spends extravagent amounts of money. more money does not automatically eqaul a winning car, let alone complete dominance. you may have to look a bit depper than that.

yeah no one else in F1 spends extravagent amounts of money. more money does not automatically eqaul a winning car, let alone complete dominance. you may have to look a bit depper than that.

Im not saying its not only reason Harry,

But it certainly would help.

Well, I was a "fan" of Senna when he was racing. I'm old enough to remember it clearly :)

However, I didn't actually admire "the man", more his ability in the car. Prost was really the only person who could regularly touch him, and yes, Prost was/is an absolute legend in my mind too :)

However, I just think, and it's only my thoughts, you guys make your own decisions, that Senna just had "something" a little extra that he could find sometimes. No doubt he could also brain snap and do some really stupid things too.

His talks of "outer body experiences" during races I can actually relate to......

Nothing will change the fact that his era was a golden age, insane cars, Prost to fight him etc..... it all started to go pear-shaped when the active chassis cars came in, and a driver of Mansell's talent could win a championship with one arm tied behind his back.

Im not saying its not only reason Harry,

But it certainly would help.

No, just the most important one. You said it was "the key point" and bolded it in the quote, clearly suggesting it was far more important than the designers, team and drivers mentioned in the same sentence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
    • I like this page, better than that silly turbo kit   https://v8roadsters.com/product-category/engine-conversions/engine-conversion-lsx/engine-conversion-lsx-nc/  
    • That would be my Shoei helmet
×
×
  • Create New...