Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^ umm you dont know senna very well do ya :]

Never said he was a saint. Though I wish I'd grown up watching senna drive i was too young then to appreciate it. I have seen that video many times though, and that looks a whole lot more like a racing incident than Hungary last year. He was an aggressive driver, but IMO quite different to Schumacher.

Maybe I'm seeing it differently, but schumacher and senna are very different drivers to me, even when they cause crashes.

Also, damn the cars were flimsy then.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgWMec_MmMM

Edited by Galois

Its not that anyone was a more skilled driver, or who punted who of a track whenever

Senna was just better to watch

It is much of the reason why i have grown to really appreciate Hamilton. These guys really know how to make it interesting. Its something guys like Button, Massa, Kimi, Hill, Prost, Mansell... even Alonso i suppose... didnt/dont have.

Theses guys are all great to have in the sport and its sad when they leave. They all bring something different and exciting to race weekends, but its guys like Senna that you everybody really remembers

Agreed. Well said.

Maybe F1 needs to limit down force to that of the 80's cars so we can really see who the better drivers are these days.

*imagines Kobayashi with less grip*

There is a big difference between them, Senna never pushed anyone into a wall at near 200 mph like schumacher did last year.

Also never seen schumacher do this.

These days he'd probably be banned from the sport for endangering a life or something ridiculous like that if he stopped on the track and got out of his car...

The videos Ivan posted clearly show him driving straight into his championship contender into turn 1 on the opening lap, in order to take him out of the race and win the championship...That's in cars a shit load less safer than they are these days... Hamilton himself said you could almost elbow through the cockpit, so I'd say a car ramming into it at any speed would be life threatening.

^ umm you dont know senna very well do ya :]

It's ok when Senna does it mate, pull your head in...

Also, damn the cars were flimsy then.

You said it...

These days he'd probably be banned from the sport for endangering a life or something ridiculous like that if he stopped on the track and got out of his car...

The videos Ivan posted clearly show him driving straight into his championship contender into turn 1 on the opening lap, in order to take him out of the race and win the championship...That's in cars a shit load less safer than they are these days... Hamilton himself said you could almost elbow through the cockpit, so I'd say a car ramming into it at any speed would be life threatening.

Once he'd committed to the gap there wasn't much he could do, Senna had 2 wheels off the track trying to avoid the contact, which combined with getting air on the ripple strip made lose steering. All I've been saying is that, in my opinion, that's a more justified racing incident than what schumacher did, and the two drivers are very different. Some people will always say there is no justification for a crash or a close call, others say that it's just part of racing and the drivers' personalities. The worst of senna's behaviour is slightly comparable to the better of schumacher's controversial moves.

Also when senna pulled over to help a fellow racer it was a more dangerous time, when people died more often. There was a big steam/smoke signal to slow drivers down and senna was hardly parked in the middle of the track. It doesn't look like there was anything but safety dictating his actions.

People's opinions will always vary on this, and have since 1990.

For the record I do think schumacher is a good driver and that many of his victories were great drives, I also think he has done some brutal and shifty things on track that few other drivers would even contemplate, and that any decent driver given #1 status with ferrari from 2000-2004 had a great chance at championship wins.

Meh to each their own

Edited by Galois

I was never a Schumi fan but I think that comment about 2000-2004 is taking quite a lot away from him and his hard work and technical feedback. He was far and away the number one driver in the sport behind the scenes in that time. The reason Ferrari dominated like that was because they were able to spend more money and have Schumi develop the car alongside Ross Brawn and his other staff that moved with him from Benetton.

Its not that anyone was a more skilled driver, or who punted who of a track whenever

Senna was just better to watch

It is much of the reason why i have grown to really appreciate Hamilton. These guys really know how to make it interesting. Its something guys like Button, Massa, Kimi, Hill, Prost, Mansell... even Alonso i suppose... didnt/dont have.

Theses guys are all great to have in the sport and its sad when they leave. They all bring something different and exciting to race weekends, but its guys like Senna that you everybody really remembers

I think the cars back then were generally more exciting to watch

I was never a Schumi fan but I think that comment about 2000-2004 is taking quite a lot away from him and his hard work and technical feedback. He was far and away the number one driver in the sport behind the scenes in that time. The reason Ferrari dominated like that was because they were able to spend more money and have Schumi develop the car alongside Ross Brawn and his other staff that moved with him from Benetton.

Note the key point there.

So Senna would never run anyone at the pit wall? This video also shows a sharp contrast to how "unavoidable" the previous Senna Prost turn 1 collision was and how fair Senna's driving was...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zznJjSncGCE

bah, everyone remembers and glorifies Senna because the media does, and has been beating it into them for the past 17years. End of story.

mix that with the nostalgia of the 'good ol days' and he's gone from someone known during his career as a fierce rival for Prost and who really only beat Prost because he'd either crash into him or slam the door to make Prost avoid a crash, to some sort of martyred F1 saint.

Edited by hrd-hr30

Note the key point there.

yeah no one else in F1 spends extravagent amounts of money. more money does not automatically eqaul a winning car, let alone complete dominance. you may have to look a bit depper than that.

yeah no one else in F1 spends extravagent amounts of money. more money does not automatically eqaul a winning car, let alone complete dominance. you may have to look a bit depper than that.

Im not saying its not only reason Harry,

But it certainly would help.

Well, I was a "fan" of Senna when he was racing. I'm old enough to remember it clearly :)

However, I didn't actually admire "the man", more his ability in the car. Prost was really the only person who could regularly touch him, and yes, Prost was/is an absolute legend in my mind too :)

However, I just think, and it's only my thoughts, you guys make your own decisions, that Senna just had "something" a little extra that he could find sometimes. No doubt he could also brain snap and do some really stupid things too.

His talks of "outer body experiences" during races I can actually relate to......

Nothing will change the fact that his era was a golden age, insane cars, Prost to fight him etc..... it all started to go pear-shaped when the active chassis cars came in, and a driver of Mansell's talent could win a championship with one arm tied behind his back.

Im not saying its not only reason Harry,

But it certainly would help.

No, just the most important one. You said it was "the key point" and bolded it in the quote, clearly suggesting it was far more important than the designers, team and drivers mentioned in the same sentence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • it was good to see our presence at GTR festival..hope to see more SAU at these events 
    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
×
×
  • Create New...