Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by DLuded

i too question the 500KW godzilla. anyway all those guys were way too confident. and the intro said that the hoons couldn't even pass "a simple driving test", a simple driving test to me would be a license test, and im sure that most poeple out there would have failed the test aswell. it was funny though to see the 200sx driver just floor it out of most corners and lose all control.

I didnt watch the whole thing, but i agree with Deluded that quiet a few ppl other than performance car drivers would fail a test like that.. Also like some-one else said in this thread how about the fords and holdens I didnt see one of those guys going through the tests.....Ohhh the IMPORT drivers MUST be the only hoons out their, what a joke.. All i saw was another biased story by another A Current affairs Show...And once again the import drivers being put in a bad light

Sorry for the rant

Cheers

Richmond

Those three guys should have been smarter and realise they were going to be set up.

Would any sane person do doughnuts etc if they were told that this will be a slot on safe drivers on Current Despair.

More than likely was told to go onto the pan ,have some fun and the camera guys will give them some private footage which they then used for the article.

As for the incar, I bet Luff egged them on and told them to push it past there limits.

As for Ian Luff, outspoken critic and showman, PFFFT, anything to get his mug on TV.

Ken

Dammit! I missed it!!

Was flicking through channels while watching neighbours (yes, only for Holly valance!) and it said "Next.... driving test.."

and i thought they meant "next show" not, next segment! Arrgh!

Someone got a DivX of it ?? pls ??

I am quite disturbed by the reputation which TodayTonight has now put on import drivers and have sent them the following email. I suggest that if people feel strong enough about how people perceive us import HPI vehicles, you also write to them and state how you feel.

---------------------------------------------

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing in regards to your story on Monday 9 September regarding "The need for speed".

Not everyone who owns a Japanese sports car a hoon on the streets. You have painted us all in a bad light when it is simply a few irresponsible people giving the rest of us a bad name.

When I saw your footage of the cars doing 200km/h+ and the bike doing nearly 300km/h on public roads, I found that to be very disturbing and realise why you were doing the story in the first place.

The truth of the matter is that you have singled out 3 individuals who were overly confident in their driving skills and turned them into a stereotype which people will now associate with myself and fellow Japanese sports car drivers. I spend a lot of my leisure time around people who own Japanese sports cars, some stock, some modified and to this day, I have not seen any of these people break any more road rules than you would find an average person breaking on any given day.

I am also a partner in a business which works on modifying, servicing and upgrading Japanese sports cars and all of our customers are 'clean' members of society. Although they may drive very fast cars, none of them brag about their driving skills like the people you had doing the training course with Ian Luff. Those 'hoons' as you describe them are simply ****y people who are too arrogant for their own good. My friends, business partners and associates spend time in this interest circle for the simple fact that we find these cars interesting and have visions of improving our cars from standard form, whether it be visibly or performance wise.

I am also questioning whether you made a mistake when you stated that the man who drove the Nissan Skyline 'Godzilla' (assuming it was a GTR) had 500 kilowatts. Are you sure you didn't mean 500 horsepower. Very few road registered cars in this country have that kind of power. I only know of one of these cars in Victoria. Although my car doesn't quite have 500 kilowatts, it has been on a dynometer and measured 360 kilowatts at the wheels. After estimating drivetrain loss, we came to the conclusion that I had 470 kilowatts at the engine. 500 kilowatts although obtainable costs a lot of money and man hours to achieve. It is not something that all high performance sports cars would have.

The only times I have really given my car a flat out push was at Calder Park drag strip during one of their legal off street drag meets.

I believe that it is a good idea to encourage driver training for people with high performance cars and there are many places in Victoria which people can partake in training courses such as the Jim Murcott Driving School and DECA training days. Maybe if you publicised this kind of training, not so many people would be having accidents due to lack of experience and training.

---------------------------------------------

I should be careful not knowing the exact "test" But it does look extremly easy. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying i have perfect control but from what i saw from the footage all mistakes were due to excessive speed.

Go slower, no cones hit :)

Does the test ask you to be over your limits? If so what sorta test is it?

As mentioned in earlier posts, the only failure i could see was the over-confidence of the "person" (loosest possible description ) driving..

2ndly - Re: the WRX

My God!, Rubber that thin (expensive) and he still does burn outs for the sake of it!?!?

A couple of the tests that Luff put me thru were:

1. Slalom, with a 180 deg turn at the bottom before returning to the garage. This was the tests that they were making a mess of, in the instance of the 200SX almost hitting the wall.

2. Wet weather change in direction and braking, @>85km/h. I didnt see any sign of this test on Today Tonight, it however was the most daunting as the witches hats were very tight and with a wet road the test entailed a lane change to the left then immediately back to the right before jumping on the breaks before you run out of road. The cars move around a bit, but by the end of it i was going into the test on 100km/hr

3. Go to whoa, with a chicane in the middle, and another 180 deg turn at the bottom before returning and stopping in the garage.

On the day i attended i saw only a couple out of control slides, which came from people competing against not only one another but the clock.

Learning the limits of the car in the wet/dry and drivers limits was the point of the day. The drivers seemd to be reasonably in tune with what a car and driver can and cant do. There werent any clueless loses like those i witnessed on Today Tonight.

And i suppose thats my point these guys didnt really have any idea as to what the limits of their cars were OR more importantly their own limits, probably because they have never done a track/driver day. Really who can honestly say they have driven their car to the LIMITS on the road?

PS: If you ever have the opportunity to have Luff drive your car, be warned he canes the life out of the car, something i didnt enjoy seeing happen to my car. However the guy demonstrates incredible car control, i think the car was sideways on the rev limiter for 36 seconds flat thru a clover test.

1st a cavaet - I've done advanced driving courses with both Luff and Findlay, and found the Findlay course to be far more professional.

Having said that, I caught up with Ian Luff at the UAS day on Sunday, we were talking about this segment. Ian's just in this for the promotion of advanced driving, he was not targeting import drivers - he said "just went to the local maccas and got some ppl from the carpark". Had there been a bunch of commonwhores waiting there it could have been a very different thread here "did you see those arrogant, dumb-arse commodore drivers?"

Ian is a driving enthusiast like most of us here, and an outspoken critic of revenue raising through speed cameras - his angle is that ppl should do courses through companys like his to improve their skills instead. Fair nuff. The sensationalisation (HUGE word that) is just to get the point across.

I think we should invite Today Tonight out to the next Eastern Creek drive day - lets tell em about wild drifitng sessions, then show em some quick laps by enthusiasts who know how to drive.

Thats a good idea. I have been bouncing emails off Motor Magazine and in particular Cameron McConville trying to arrange them to attend one of the days, bring along some CSV/HSV etc that they are road testing and also get driving tips from Cam and other driver/journalists.

Cant say ive had much luck.

I agree with what you say about Ian, drivers ed in school is what he is striving for! Good luck to him i have nothing against people earning a living. (Just dont kill my car)

1GTR2GO,

I see your point, but also why do they take 3 morons in Jap cars and not also chuck an Aus car in the mix. Eg. A 300 Kw GTS. Not the easiest of cars to tame as it is RWD and has a considerable amount of power. Also the weight of the car doesn't help when sideways action is involved.

That letter is perfect leewah, I was going to do something similar after I watched the story. I'm just too lazy :)

Let me know if you get a response back.. maybe we should try and organise something to TT on the Import Enthusiast, rather than the 'Maccas Boyz'

I also think that if you grabbed a handful of commie drivers and did the same thing, it would be an even worse result.

It just annoys me that now we will be targeted not just from police but other drivers on the road thinking we are hoons.

Originally posted by ex-static  

Let me know if you get a response back.. maybe we should try and organise something to TT on the Import Enthusiast, rather than the 'Maccas Boyz'  

I also think that if you grabbed a handful of commie drivers and did the same thing, it would be an even worse result.  

It just annoys me that now we will be targeted not just from police but other drivers on the road thinking we are hoons.  

Couldnt have said it better myself :uh-huh:

I remember seeing a similar thing on ACA or TT AGES ago. Some dumb muzza who owned a 425ci (cant remember the exact size) V8 charger and cliamed that he could control his car perfectly at 300+km/h.... I think not. Micky Schu or Peter Brock maybe, but not Mr Muz at 1 Dik-ed St. He couldnt even get a commo around witches hats at 60km/h.

Those people were chosen with the intention of generating a negative image towards HP cars... and they succeeded. Its just very frustrating!

I think it was more about making young drivers out to be idiots, not so much the cars.

I think Duncan mentioned Luff was only out to increase the exposure to his company, not out to burn import drivers, i agree.

At the end of the day most non car people i know couldnt tell the difference between a Paseo and a Skyline, and that stock 200SX was pretty bland. I believe any problems arising from police etc will still come from age, not so much car.

PS- I must be one of the lucky ones, ive racked up around 55000kms in 18 months and have not been hassled by Police once, only ever pulled over for a breath analysers , (i was only wearig underwear @2am but thats another story.) Before that another Skyline and same story.

Originally posted by Duncan

I think we should invite Today Tonight out to the next Eastern Creek drive day - lets tell em about wild drifitng sessions, then show em some quick laps by enthusiasts who know how to drive.

I was thinking that exact thing Duncan. Give them a taste of their own medicine. Talk it up like we're a bunch of loonies and then show them what really goes on (though we probably lock Pete in someones boot while the cameras are there :rolleyes: ).

Roy, it aint that hard is it. Just the attitude. :)

i would fit nicely in one of those tt shows(im overweight)

give us a chance redd i promiss ill be good(i would have had some class and done reverse donuts)

what have we learn from this program.. sorry i have to generalise here but basically "keep all dum fat lebs with powerfull cars of the street"

if that coment offended anyone good cause that was the idea

just jokes hahahahahahaahahahaha lol

pete

hahaha fatz.

missed the show... my gf told me about it.. made me cringe cause i knew what was going to happen... oh well... i dont care... id love to take one of those courses once my cars all setup and insured and ready to go :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this is an old thread but I have a particular attachment to the ENR34, so I don't think additional content hurts. For starters, I agree with everyone here in that the performance of a stock R34 GTR is a pretty low bar and one that you're going to spend a lot of money "matching". Now if you're willing to deviate from that template as your goal, you'll be much better off and enjoy the car much more. The engine in the NA R34s is a real kick in the nuts in terms of upgradability compared to previous generation NA cars. The NA heads on the RB2X NEOs have MUCH smaller intake port cross sections and are not compatible with any of the aftermarket forward-facing manifolds available for the RB25DET. This can be remedied with a RB25DET NEO head, but those are expensive relative to what they are. A full long-block from a turbo AWD Stagea is generally a better value and will run you about $4000 USD to get it to you. This will get you the stronger RB26DETT rods, as well. That would give you a base to build off of to be safe in the 400whp range. Not shooting for the moon, but if the stock R34 was your bar, this engine would buy you enough to be just North of stock GTR power. A forward facing manifold would allow for the easiest method toward using Bosch EV14 format injectors such as those from Injector Dynamics and FIC, to name a couple. People hate them because they're copies, but Greddy fakes can be had for around $300 USD. With what the fuel rail, regulator, injectors, and the rail adds, figure $2000 USD for the whole setup including the manifold. With the OEM brackets and a bit of trimming to the ends of the lower frame rails, the OEM intercooler mounting brackets can be used to mount an OEM GTR intercooler, or an aftermarket one made for a GTR. Those are handy vs a universale due to the angles that the end tanks have on them. Then your plumbing become super straightforward at that point despite having to cut a hole where the battery is an a matching one on the other side for the pipes. Battery can go to the trunk. I'd round up to a healthy $2000 USD here too (maybe even a tiny more) to allow for a nice aftermarket unit and some pipe fabrication. Or if you can find someone that's upgrading to something larger, the used market comes in clutch here for a decent savings. I won't even get into turbo sizing as that's something that would be for yourself to determine. HOWEVER, for the purposes of your stated goals, a Borg Warner 7064 with an internal wastegate would be a perfect spooler and would make stock GTR power easily. It would also bolt up to your OEM manifold (that would come with the DET you purchased a couple steps above) if it were ordered with a T3 flange. More with adequate fuel. If you can stick with the OEM exhaust manifold then expect to be in the whole about $6000 USD for decent turbo like the one suggested, a down pipe, new O2, and full exhaust to mate up, and upgrades to the integrated BOV in an EFR or a standalone BOV for a different turbo, as well as an aftermarket IWG (internal waste gate). Those last two are definitely optional and unnecessary. All of this stuff above does you no good without any way of tuning and or monitoring the engine. Bite the bullet on a standalone engine management solution. If your experience with wiring is limited, you're going to have to hand it off to someone else, though. Unfortunately, the adapter/patch harnesses available are typically made around the GTT which does not include AWD, and the GTR, which integrates into a lot of chassis features that aren't present in your wiring interface. So the ENR34 is the oddball. So you'll want to expand a bit on your selection and find an ECU that's capable of running the ATTESA pump also. I have a Link Thunder, but you don't need quite that much ECU to accommodate that. You WILL need someone with the know-how to tune it and code those features into whatever software it uses. And to wire it up. This will be your most significant expense. Call it $6000 USD with an ECU, an okay wiring job (no motorsport grade at this price), aftermarket triggers and R35 coils, and the time it takes to tune the ECU with added features (electronic boost control solenoid, MAP, IAT, the new triggers, and ATTESA) and don't be surprised if it's more if you want better work done. Grab a clutch made for any RB pull transmission R32/R33GTR made for the power handling capacity you're looking for. Budget $1500 USD for a new good one. That's about $20,000 USD for an engine you've upgraded yourself and had wired and tuned by someone else. That's no brakes (ENR34 brakes are pathetic), suspension (again, pathetic), or wheels and tires. So you're pretty spot on in terms of spending $30,000 USD extra on the car just to get it to perform a little better than a stock R34 GTR while looking like a bone stock ENR34 with some wheels and suspension mods. That doesn't include fluids, maintenance items, gaskets/seals, repairs needed or anything else discovered along the way. But you'll have a car you can take to the track and have fun without worrying as much about nicks and dings.  
    • Okay so, please read this. car started and ran fine. got my tuned ecu by RSenthalpy, did a bunch of pulls to test it out and finally drive the car after half a year of it just sitting and idling at most. Everything was good, thing ran flawlessly and had so much power, didn't feel slower than a Prius anymore. Parked it back and turned it off.  Next day, I install an AFR and start the car. Didn't wire anything to the ecu. Just gauge.  Car started, but died out in about a minute. I figured it was cause my car was on a lift and the fuel was really low and old. I add 5 gallons of fuel, still cranks but no start. I remove all AFR wiring (tapped into double din acc and power wires but there was a nest of wiring there so I was worried I messed something up. tried to put it back to how it was prior to afr install.) Still cranks no start. Changed spark plugs with brand new ones Changed fuel pump with a new one (verified working) Did compression test , compression came back all at 150ish. All fuses are good, Relay seemed good but ill double check by switching similar relays around. Verified MAF is working - Ended up getting curious as to why fuel pump is not priming when ignition is on, so I cut the fuel pump ground and power and connected them directly to a portable jumper. I also disconnected fuel line to fuel rail to verify fuel is being sent. So with direct jumper power, the fuel pump turns on and shot gas everywhere through the fuel pipe that I had disconnected, so ny doing that, I verified no clogs in fuel lines or filter. - Tried starting the car with that jumper directly wired to power and ground, but car still did not start. I'm guessing its a CAS issue but im a little scared to check it without messing up timing or anything else since I actually dont understand how to check CAS lol. If anyone has any other suggestions or recommendations , please let me know.
    • Hi all. I am aware there is lots of discussions about jacking points, where to lift the car and what not. But as usual just a lot of "in my opinion" and nothing definitive, and everyone does it in a different way. I want to hear from some experienced people on which points on the car it's okay/safe/recommended to lift the car using a four point hoist/lift. I will attach some images of my underbody. Sills are largely okayish, the driver side jacking point is pretty mangled though and it looks like the underfloor is slightly pushed in too, but I might be wrong. In the German Skyline forum, the consensus is to use the sidemember chassis rails in the front and the rear subframe? bushing in the rear. I know the manual says to never use the sidemember for loading but lots of folk do it and it was definitely done on my car too as they are slightly bent too. Based on the images, what points do I use to not make the already present damage worse? I'd use wood or rubber blocks to spread the load across a bigger area of course. Driver side sidemember and jacking point mangled one) https://imgur.com/a/eKjzrJX Driver side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/W3DWF1P Passenger side sidemember and jacking point https://imgur.com/a/65UvIJe Passenger side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/h3k7j53 We can also see some underbody rust but so far it all looks somewhat treatable and nothing that requires a Yoshida style restoration.
    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...