Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You reckon the ultimate rear housing would be a divided tial s/s concoction? Im sure the tial v band s/s housings must have some benefits other then easy attachment to the manifold and stainless to retain thermal energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They way I look at it is: The WRC and Lemans spec Garrett motorsport turbos run a V-band housing.

Surely if there was a huge advantage with the twin-scroll turbos they would be using them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've machined up a few rd blocks with the nitto 3.2 crank. the only feed back we've heard is 1 got under 8 seconds down the quarter (methanol nos 60psi and sohc, dedicated drag car)

You have been using RD28 blocks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have been using RD28 blocks?

Tuffer than a gtr500 block with ultra thick cylinder walls and extra webbing everywhere.

bit of dicking around to match to a twin cam head and about as heavy as a 30 block or even heavier but strong as all getup.

A mate has been thrashing the shit out of a 3.2 litre built on this block making over 700 at all 4 for 3 years or more. Bombproof!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im pretty sure that most of that strength advantage of the RD28 block begins to dissapear once you start boring and stroking them. The only thing that would help a little is the external coolant return from the head near the back of the block on the right side.

The standard bore being 85mm does make the cylinders thicker, but in order to maintain coolant flow between the cylinders in the block, the OD of the sleeves is still around 92-93mm maximum. So 4mm cylinder wall thickness at best with a 85mm bore.

The ability to run the squirters would dissapear with larger strokes as well unless you were to slot the crankshaft like an OS giken crank, or like I did when fitting my modified RB30 crank to the RB26 block.

You have to clearence the sides of the block for the rods when the stroke is greatly increased. See the attached picture and how close the No3 rod bolts are to the side of the case, and the required case clearencing. This is an RD28 with a 90mm stroke. There will be 1mm clearence from the rod to the crankcase. The main caps are billet alloy and the main studs are offset drilled from the standard 10mm holes, to 14mm. The standard RD28 cradle wouldn't clear the 90mm crank.

Being in Australia its really hard to pass up on the RB30 block just for how easily they are obtained and adapted to an RB26 head. In my opinion, there are other opportinities such as sleeving that people should really consider a lot more befoer heading down the RD28 conversion path.

post-26553-0-52348900-1324201290_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive seen that picture somewhere before. Very tough setup.

Possibly on the GTR UK forum. Its from an 8 second R32 GTR in Urkaine. He ran an 8.16 with this setup. A rod went through the side of the block though, and now a new engine is being built to replace it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly on the GTR UK forum. Its from an 8 second R32 GTR in Urkaine. He ran an 8.16 with this setup. A rod went through the side of the block though, and now a new engine is being built to replace it.

is the owner rebuilding another rd28 or making a switch to the rb30?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is the owner rebuilding another rd28 or making a switch to the rb30?

He's keeping the RD28 block and replicating what he had with some improvements. Availibility of the block is the main factor though. RD28 blocks are easier to source than RB30 are for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's probably an underlying issue with the A/C system too. I recently fixed mine, now it's fully control by the Haltech and car's factory HVAC controller  Have a squiz here:    
    • And by the way, I've also checked the ECU diagnostic numerous times and got a bad O2 sensor code and initially an Ignition Primary code, which is why I replaced the O2 sensor and all the ignition components (coil packa, plug and loom). No codes have been coming up lately despite the ongoing issue.
    • Hey pber13, unfortunately still no luck. At this point the following has been done with little or no success: - Spark plugs replaced, gapped to 0.8mm - Splitfire coilpacks installed to replace originals - Replaced Ignition Coil/Coilpack harness with a new genuine nissan one - New fuel filter - Replaced AFM/MAF sensor - Injectors have been thoroughly cleaned with an online flush (without removing) - Upper engine and inlet decarbed - blew tons of black smoke out, cleared the carbon deposits from the top of the engine and exhaust.  - IACV removed and thoroughly cleaned with carburettor cleaner - O2 sensor replaced with new and genuine one -  Smoke test revealed no vacuum leaks - Healthy compression test of 160psi across all 6 cylinders Overall the car does run a lot smoother now, no backfires between gear shifts like it did originally... but the rough idle when warmed up is still there. It may not even be a misfire but simply a rough idle. Seems crazy to me that so many people have had this issue and seemingly no one has gotten to the bottom of it, or at least never bothered to post if they did! Hope you have more luck than I did pber13, I'm at a point now where I'm just going to try to ignore it unless it gets worse. Would love to fix it but I've genuinely run out of ideas of what it could be.
    • I got the full frenchys kit too. Really awesome kit. Easy to install my only complaint was the hardlines I think could be routed differently (I modified mine) but I realise the kit needs to suit multiple applications. This was the hard lines before I modified them. They were touching the wastegate pipe. I ended up reducing the distance between firewall and first bend. The made it so they tucked along the frame rail.
    • Deeve, I don't suppose that you've made any progress on this? My Stagea has the exact same problem, and just like you, I've read through as much as I can online, with no real progress. My car isn't throwing any codes at all, which is a little frustrating. I've changed plugs, checked the wiring and harness. A new MAF gets here next week, but I'm not hopeful it will solve the issue.
×
×
  • Create New...