Jump to content
SAU Community

Amp to match 2 subs..


Driver
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Im not after a name brand and i dont have deep pockets, but im after a decent amp that will run two 10" subs that i will be able to crank up.

Im about to buy in a week or two..

The last amp i had blew up twice after getting if fixed again and i dont want an amp that is going to be underpowerd or die on me.

If you could give me any suggestions that would be great.

Thanks

Brendan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally - I got this info on it off the web..

Peak Power Handling (watts): 500 watt

RMS Power Handling (watts): 120 watt

Diameter (inch/mm): 10/250

Frequency Range (Hz): 20 - 3000 Hz

Sensitivity (dB/W/m): 93

Aluminium Cone

Chromium-Plated Basket

Ceramic Magnet System: 1134g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you want something cheap - me and my bro recently put an alpine 400 series amp driving two alpine 10" subs into his silvia. easily as loud as the two 12's in mine, just not as "penetrating" i guess. i use a rockford amp, for him we grabbed a second hand jobbie for less than $300 from cash converters! they are guaranteed for 3 months, he's had it over a year now with no dramas. they cost about 800 new for what we bought.

something to think about if you're on a tight budget.

otherwise kicker make some decent cheapish amps (audiocom sells them) and some of stratfield car radio's more expensive amps i've seen good results with. you get what you pay for though, i'm sure everyone knows that!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still sticking by the Audison SRx2S recommendation for the budget of $600.

If you can raise your budget $100 there are quite a few other amps I would suggest like the Audison LRx1.400, Zapco 500M and Boston GT-24 as we do special Skyline forums prices on them. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dont get sucked in by the 'wow' factor of 1000watts etc. or any max power settings.

if ur subs are SVC 4ohms, get a 2ohm stable monoblock to run them in parallel,

ur info doesnt say they are but im assuming they are...if each sub has only 1 set of terminals then they are.

the srx2s is a nice amp, very powerful for ur application and i'd recommend it over any of the other listed amps. if its in ur budget, get it off fhrx. leaves a lot of headroom for any upgrades u might want. i know i was considering that for my amp a while ago, in the end i got a 2nd hand audison lrx1.400

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend not to worry about the MAX power ratings as you hardly ever hit them anyway when listening to music. Look for the continous power ratings.

Other things to look out for is damping factor (you want it to stay as far above 50 as possible) and THD (anything below 0.6 is okay for a sub amp).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

either max or rms, not both.

who told u to look at max ? pretty wierd considering a 1000watt amp might output 1000W for a single frequency for a single moment in time for a certain voltage and load resistance. and hover around to 25watt mark the rest of the time.

look at rms figures, and compare amps to what ur going to run, in this case, 2OHMS not 4OHMS, 12V when the cars off, 14volts when the cars running.

audison rate their amps at 14.4 volts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would an amp with these specs run my subs ok?

Its a xplod amp, its just that i might beable to get a good price on it..

1200W max power

200W x 2 RMS into 4 ohms, 20Hz - 20kHz @ 0.1% THD

500W x 1 RMS into 4 ohms, 20Hz - 20kHz @ 0.15% THD

Class A/B

Variable 50-300Hz low pass filter

40Hz EQ boost

Line level through-put

MOSFET output stage & power supply

RCA & speaker level inputs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

something like that would do, as ur subs can only handle 120rms each.

if u can get a cheap price on it and audio's not really ur number 1 priority, yeh go for it. suit ur purposes nicely. Sony's not really well regarded for its car audio stuff though..but depends on ur price (:

doesnt leave much room for upgrade later on thats all...that being said, something is better than nothing. will sound quite nice with 200rms into those subs .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, yeah, no arguing that the duty cycle is different. And a circuit car will go to those speeds for more distance and longer times. But, I suspect that if a tailshaft has a harmonic problem, that it would cause damage and shit itself maybe even on the first pass. A second or two of running at the resonant/harmonic problem speed is already a couple hundred revolutions.
    • Shaft speed would be the same, however it's how long they hold it there for and repeated conditions. FWIW half way down the main straight at SMSP I'm bouncing off 4th with a 8600RPM limiter. That shaft would be spinning at 8600RPM for a few seconds before I need to smash the brakes, by T2 it's getting close to that speed again. Now a drag car/roll race car would see that shaft speed for a 1 to 2 secs then they would coast, hit the brakes and that's it.
    • With same diff ratio, tyre diameter and road speed, the tailshaft rpm is the same regardless of the gearbag's ratio. Given that very quick drag cars are probably doing similar road speeds to the fastest circuit cars (circa 300 km/h), and there will be many of either category that can't go that fast and so you'd have inummerable matchups between drag and circuit car speeds at smaller numbers, and given that they are probably using rather similar tyre diameters and probably using similar diff ratios, and...where any of those numbers were different they could quite easily be in opposite directions thus cancelling out.... I think you'd find that there'd be more similarity than difference in tailshaft speed between these two use cases, no?
    • they might see those prop shaft speeds for 1 to 2 secs only 
    • A year of slogging through this bearing issue and finally fixed. What a nightmare. The oil pressure increase did not fix the problem. If you would like to read all the details in case you ever run into a similar issue visit my thread on Yellow Bullet. https://www.yellowbullet.com/threads/continuous-rod-bearing-issues.2689569/?post_id=74193031&nested_view=1&sortby=oldest#post-74193031 In the end the rod bearings themselves were the issue. I had switched from ACL (first engine) to King because that was all we could get at the time and I thought nothing of it. Put the ACL's back in after a year of taking the pan off multiple times to change many things. Issue resolved. Can't believe it was just the bearings themselves all along. It has now been about two years since I drove the car on the street or had it at the track. At some point I had installed all solid and spherical bushings in the rear but had never aligned it since it just went on and off the dyno. Alignment was the first thing to do. (Old photo but same concept) Then I took the transmission out and went through it. This was my first gearset install and I've done about 15 since this one and learned a lot and wanted to apply some of these tweaks to mine. The aftermarket shift forks take very well to some modification and I wanted to make that change. Shifts are now super smooth and no having to find the gear. I also recut the 5th and reverse shift sleeves - always wanted to try this and see how well it works. It works very well! No grinds or having to do a second attempt going into reverse and 5th is perfect. Before During After Going back in In rummaging through my spare trans parts box I found the only parts I've ever broke on a stock trans; the 3-4 shift fork - twice!  
×
×
  • Create New...