Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day guys,

Been doing a fair bit of reading on SAU and other places regarding blow-by, catch-cans and the good ol' PCV valve.

For now, let's assume we don't want to vent to atmosphere - i know we probably do, but for this argument, let's pretend we don't :)

It seems there's two trains of thought regarding blocking the PCV. Some say you need to leave it intact if you're not venting to atmo, others say it's best to block it.

I'm trying to get my head around which is actually better, and why.

The way I understand it, in 'stock' configuration, the PCV allows the engine to breathe into the intake manifold while under vacuum, and closes under boost, when it can breathe via the exhaust side hose into the pre-turbo intake pipe.

If we were to just block the PCV, and change nothing else, wouldn't it just mean that all of the breathing would happen via the turbo inlet pipe? Aside from the large amounts of oil that would be pushed into the intake, are there any other issues with this?

If we then put a catch can with a decent oil/air separator setup in between the rocker cover and the intake pipe, wouldn't this allow the engine to breathe as required, without pushing any oil directly into the intake manifold and reducing the octane rating?

I figure I must be missing something here - mainly because of this: Nissan put a PCV valve in there for a reason - it must be required for something I'm overlooking! :rofl:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/345545-oil-catch-canpcv-setups/
Share on other sites

The way i see it leave the pcv alone and remove and block the intake side at the turbo. This actually pulls oil out ofthe head in a way. There is alot of vacuum there.

I'm aware of how that works - but wouldn't it be better to prevent as much oil vapour from entering the intake as possible? does it actually *need* to be 'drawn out' - isn't it enough to just let it breathe 'naturally'?

I'm trying to work out what the 'reason' behind leaving the PCV setup stock and allowing it to breathe into the intake manifold is...

zyeby9.jpg

This is my setup. Yes you need to draw Crank case ventilation from your engine. Believe it or not, you actually want vacuum in your crank case to help pull the ring down on to the ring land of your piston which also helps the push the ring against the bore.

Leaving the tube from your rocker cover to your turbo helps the no end.

Following the diagram, All the red lines are contaminated with oil, all the blue lines are scrubbed from vapor by baffling and steel wool in the oil air separator.

This setup is completely sealed and legal. It never needs to be drained and has 0 maintenance.

I just leave my dipstick tune in my boot and use it when necessary.

Edited by HYPED6
  • Like 1
zyeby9.jpg

This is my setup. Yes you need to draw Crank case ventilation from your engine. Believe it or not, you actually want vacuum in your crank case to help pull the ring down on to the ring land of your piston which also helps the push the ring against the bore.

Leaving the tube from your rocker cover to your turbo helps the no end.

Following the diagram, All the red lines are contaminated with oil, all the blue lines are scrubbed from vapor by baffling and steel wool in the oil air separator.

This setup is completely sealed and legal. It never needs to be drained and has 0 maintenance.

I just leave my dipstick tune in my boot and use it when necessary.

wouldnt this setup still have the same effect if used without the pcv and line? also what do you have in the catch can to stop steel wool fibres from being sucked up?

yeah thought about that.. problem is i couldn't because of the way the catch can is designed- can't open it up

i could only stuff the stainless steel wool in through the fittings

i'm using the thicker scourer type of steel wool, not the cotton look-alike soapy pad type

Edited by chiksluvit

pcv is there because what comes out the engine breathers is no good for the environment and counts as part of total emissions and the easiest way to deal with it is to burn it (cheap skate factory. well i dont blame them really )

block the pcv . no oil shit stinkin up the intake manifold

run a decent air/oil seperator baffled catch can between the rockers and turbo intake . no oil in anything systen still sealed . engine breathes fine because there is partial vacuum between the afm and

hard to jump in after the paint-master HYPED, but here goes..

I have welded a fitting onto my turbo oil drain on the block (hot-side), as setup as follows

I haven't planned on using the PCV, any problems with this setup? i haven't used it yet, the car is due to turn over in a couple of weeks.. This thread had me thinking, under boost, could i possibly be sucking oil up the oil drain and into my catchcan?? i'm guessing the turbo inlet pipe produces a vacuum but unsure to what extent..

post-30449-1291160181_thumb.jpg

wouldnt this setup still have the same effect if used without the pcv and line? also what do you have in the catch can to stop steel wool fibres from being sucked up?

Yes, if you block the PCV valve and the return line, you would just put little filters on the top of the catch can to run atmo.

hard to jump in after the paint-master HYPED, but here goes..

I have welded a fitting onto my turbo oil drain on the block (hot-side), as setup as follows

I haven't planned on using the PCV, any problems with this setup? i haven't used it yet, the car is due to turn over in a couple of weeks.. This thread had me thinking, under boost, could i possibly be sucking oil up the oil drain and into my catchcan?? i'm guessing the turbo inlet pipe produces a vacuum but unsure to what extent..

post-30449-1291160181_thumb.jpg

I'd be worried about introducing that kind of vacuum to the turbo oil return...

It would be drawing air from the crankcase via the the turbo drain.. air that would be flowing against the oil trying to drain out of the turbo (could there be enough vacuum at high rpms to pull oil up in to the can??).. the oil is not under any pressure but neither is the oil trying to flow back from the head down the factory drains (the reason why we go to these breathing extremes).. It would also mean there is a constant vacuum (fed in part by the drain) in the can which probably wouldn't help the oil to drain.

I dunno, I just wouldn't screw with it is all :)

Edited by bubba

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...