Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

I'm going to be ordering a wideband O2 in the next 2 weeks and have found a really good price. Only really interested organising it for SA people as people will have to pick them up from me in Campbelltown, that way i don't have to stuff around with postage.

I have read a number of reviews and they are one of the best budget O2 sensor available. Generally they are around $250 mark. They also come with two gauge faces and two bezels so you can set them up to match your other gauges.

you can setup one of the output wires to simulate the factory Nerst cell (factory O2 sensor) signal so you can remove the factory O2 and just use the UEGO signal to control your ECU in closed loop.

Digital Wideband Air / Fuel Gauge

A wideband UEGO sensor controller accurately monitors Air/Fuel ratios (AFR) during the tuning process to prevent a lean fuel mixture, which could lead to engine damage. AEM has combined its single-channel wideband UEGO controller and gauge display into one unit, uniting unsurpassed AFR accuracy and control with an easy-to-read interface. AEM’s Gauge-Type Wideband UEGO Controller features a digital LED display and sweeping LED “needle” that changes colors as AFR changes from rich to lean. The unit’s 52mm (2-1/16”) gauge housing fits in most gauge pods and can be remotely mounted virtually anywhere.

  • Ideal AFR monitoring tool for EFI and carbureted applications, and engine dynamometers
  • Does not oscillate AFR reading like narrow band sensors
  • No laptop required for monitoring!
  • Bosch sensor included
  • Accurate to 0.1 AFR
  • Reads in AFR or Lambda via a switch in back of gauge housing
  • 24 Color-coded LED display lights provide immediate reference to engine’s air/fuel ratio (AFR) or Lambda ratio
  • Integrated three-digit display reveals AFR or Lambda in real time
  • User-programmable 0-5v analog output included for use with data loggers and virtually any engine management system
  • Serial data stream included for output of AFR (RS 232)

aemuegologo.jpg

Edited by heslo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/345742-wideband-o2-sensor-aem-uego/
Share on other sites

Seems to be just power and earth is needed, the Sensor just clips in to a loom and if you are going to use the Wide band to simulate the narrow band signal then there is one other wire than need to be wired in, but since your running a GTR you would need two so i would suggest getting the bung welded into the dump where the two front pipes meet.

Here's the manual;

AEM_UEGO_Wide_Band_AFR_Installation_Instructions_30_4100.pdf

Still looking for cheaper prices, it's looking like they will be at or around the $200 mark from Australia. Hearing back from a dealer in the next couple days.

Edited by D_Stirls

Ok Guys i have found a seller in Australia and The price is $200 and the order will be put in at the end of this week or the beginning of next. So if you want to get in on this PM me and i'll send you that bank details.

I would prefer to have people pick them up but if you really need it to be posted i'll put it in an express post bag (which i think is $15).

I found out that the reason the international sellers wouldn't send them overseas was because the warranty only covers the country they are sold in; so if i brought them in from the states they wouldn't have a warranty.

So these have a warranty as they are from an Australian seller.

Ok Guys i have found a seller in Australia and The price is $200 and the order will be put in at the end of this week or the beginning of next. So if you want to get in on this PM me and i'll send you that bank details.

I would prefer to have people pick them up but if you really need it to be posted i'll put it in an express post bag (which i think is $15).

I found out that the reason the international sellers wouldn't send them overseas was because the warranty only covers the country they are sold in; so if i brought them in from the states they wouldn't have a warranty.

So these have a warranty as they are from an Australian seller.

Apparently PM are down for the time being.

Just email me on; [email protected]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...