Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just going through our shed and ive turned up a set of 32 gtst calipers 4 pots and rotors so hmmm front brake conversion

questions

1) is there a diff between r32 gtst calipers and r33 gtst callipers?

2) and diff between 33 and 32 rotors my memory is not that good think 32 are like 280mm or something not sure about 33

3)would it still be worth the upgrade using the 32 rotors seems there brand new and sitting in the shed

any help would be good

cheers

Rose

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/345744-quick-brake-question/
Share on other sites

1) Yes, R32 GTST callipers are suited to 280mm rotors and R33 GTST are suited to a 296mm rotor. mounting bolts and brake lines are the same, just some cosmetic differences, the 32 ones have fins and 33 ones don't.

2) as above, R32 280mm, R33 296mm.

3) its up to you, stock stagea callipers are only 2 pot fronts compared to the 4 pot 32 ones, but the 32's are a smaller rotor than the stock stagea, i think S1 stagea rotors are 290mm. alot of people will argue that with new rotors and a good set of pad the stagea ones are good enough. personally i'd sell the R32 ones and track down some R32 GTR/R33 GTST ones, they are 4 pot and run the bigger rotor.

just make sure you trail fit before committing to installing any of them, especially check the calliper to rim clearance as the 4 pots will stick out about 20-25mm further towards the rim disk.

Edited by QWK32

hmmmm so can any one confirm the size of s1 stag rotors if they are the same size as 32gtst rotors i will prob chuck these gtst rotors and calipers on at least there 4 pots

cheers

so some searching has not helped found a listing for wgnc34 rb25det rotors as 280mm :D but straight under it a listing for wg(n)c34 rb25det rotors at 290mm :) so any one know what the (N) denotes model wise think i should just go out and take wheel off and measure rotors but its cold and late

so some searching has not helped found a listing for wgnc34 rb25det rotors as 280mm :D but straight under it a listing for wg(n)c34 rb25det rotors at 290mm :) so any one know what the (N) denotes model wise think i should just go out and take wheel off and measure rotors but its cold and late
n=4wd
  • Thanks 1
Pretty sure S1 and R32 GTST rotors are the same size's, as the slotted rotors im running with my stock S1 stag calipers are made for 32gtst

Yep your right measured up rotors today 280mm so will get a set of slotted rotors and use the r32 4 pots i got sitting here

just make sure you trail fit before committing to installing any of them, especially check the calliper to rim clearance as the 4 pots will stick out about 20-25mm further towards the rim disk.

I can confirm this (a little lol) as I run WGNC34 16" rims for drifting on my R33 GTS-t. Rears fit fine (but sit inside the guards like crazy!) but the fronts foul on the callipers as the wheel's offset is too high. It's probably out by about 2mm and can be fixed with spacers, but I'd sooner recommend new wheels :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
    • You reckon? I have to disagree. Notwithstanding that at some point we may all be forced to do this to our cars if we want to keep driving them, there is absolutely nothing about an electric-converted-previously-IC-car that is ever good. EVs that are built by OEMs on platforms that were originally IC already suck, let alone the shitty outcomes that result from doing it as a retro to something that was actually built as an IC car. This is because the platform really needs to be designed to house the battery in a useful place (ie, down as low as possible) and the motors are properly located relative to the wheels that they have to drive. Converted platforms already suck at this. But when you try to shove sufficient battery capacity into a previously IC car, you can't put it down on/in the floor, because that space doesn't exist. You can't find enough space where the fuel tank used to be (if it is an inboard fuel tank) and you don't want to hang it out behind the rear axle line if you had a rear fuel tank. And there's not enough space in the tunnel if you still want to use it for anything remotely like what it was originally used for. The engine bay is too big for a motor, and you'd really prefer that the motor for the rear wheels wasn't in the front engine bay anyway. And there's not enough room where the diff was for a proper man-sized E motor. And then.... there is the complete lack of soul and emotion that is provided by EVs. There are some cracking restomods out there. Like the Alfaholics GTA thingo. But it is petrol powered. Look at the alternative EV version of a GTA restomod by Totem. it is jaw droppingly beautiful. But by all reports is is objectively awful to drive, despite having 600 HP or something, simply because there is nothing there. It sounds like a sewing machine or a leaf blower. It should scream and wail and make the hairs on your neck stand up. Oh, and it's 1500 bloody kg in a car that was <900kg when new. GTRs are heavy enough as it is without pushing them up to 2tonnes worth of pork.
    • https://www.dezeen.com/2025/01/06/nissan-electric-r32-skyline-gt-r-godzilla-sports-car/   I reckon this is pretty cool. Lots of other Resto mods have turned to ev power.
    • hahaha @joshuaho96 the most action it gets is when I have to drive from West to SE VIC to meet the fam. Even then, it;s on highway cruising speeds
    • don't know anyone in this thread, but i just found it, read the entire thing in a few hours, realized greg is still posting progress, and just have to say, this is awesome. it looks awesome. 100% right about the Uras kit making it a pain to get on hoists...have the same kit on my 34 and it takes six 2x4s and race ramps to do it without taking parts off. this reminds me exactly of this thread. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/r63-amg-the-unicorn-of-my-destruction/110824/page8/
×
×
  • Create New...