Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys i have looked but cant find anything...

im thinking of putting some king spring onto my 34 gtt, just the lows as i have only the std schocks..anyways what i want to know is, how much lower the car will actually get?? they say 35mm but i havent seen anybody write how low it actually went, imo 35mm really isnt that much lower.

Anybody with them fitted could u give us a height ur car is sitting and maybe some pics too. duz it look good at the lower height??

Thanks guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/346238-how-low/
Share on other sites

You will find that you car wont actually be 35mm lower. YOur current springs would have sagged a bit over time. The Kings are 35mm lower from the stock springs when new. SO if your std springs have sagged 20mm then it will only be 15mm lower than it is now.

I know it is a fair bit more, but it is well worth waiting a bit longer and saving for some coilovers or some matched springs and struts.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/346238-how-low/#findComment-5575623
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

get coilovers. wind it all the way down till your rail/exhaust hits the ground. wind it up 5mm. done.

My thoughts exactly when I read the first post.

(aside from the toilet paper roll length list of things its going to screw on the suspension geometry)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/346238-how-low/#findComment-5587509
Share on other sites

get coilovers. wind it all the way down till your rail/exhaust hits the ground. wind it up 5mm. get told by guy doing wheel alignment you have 30 degrees of negative camber he can't take out, put hat on backwards, say "sick", drive off, get defected, raise car, curse cop, done.

re-fixed

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/346238-how-low/#findComment-5588037
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...