Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In my humble opinion if you tune your 3lt to make peak torque across the entire rpm range it will be a much more difficult car to drive, the sheer amount of torque that the three litre can develop at 3000/4800 rpm in an area where the boost is rapidly rising to target wastegate pressure will break the tyre contact patch, assuming your car is not FBW throttle then timing and boost are the only means of controling the power in the mid range. To tune to peak torque above this area and maintain peak torque for as long as possible is the key to tunning any engine.

Look to making modifications to the rear geometry as even the 33 has way to much anti squat in the rear to work with radial r tyre, which will make putting any more than 380rwkw to the ground through a radial challenging.

In my 32 it is a faster car with 490rwk even at a tight circuit like baskerville, as long as the power is controllable and follows throttle request (well as well as you could expect a turbo car to). There are large gains to be had in FBW throttle mapping getting rid of all waste throttle, ie only requesting 40% of plate opening if peak torque can be generated at this opening as this means a pedal reduction of 2% yeilds a reduction of horse power, increasing actual fly opening as rpm increases allways only requesting the min value to net max engine power at given rpm. Gear dependant boost pressure will also help and the holinger and quieff boxes have a voltage output making setting this function up very straight foward. cheers brad

hollinger, + setting up the fly by wire throttle + ECU to run it etc

true you wont do what youve stated above for 30k if your buying new parts and paying someone to do any part oif it , tunning, install etc. What else other than a quaffe/holinger can you poke 420rwkwrwk through without it turning inside out in a race car if the car setup to put it to the ground.

Jerico 4 or 5 speed road race box? Im surprised no one really runs these in Aus. I got rough figures of about $6500 for a 4 speed and ~$8000 for a 5 speed for an 800hp capable box when I looked into it. Edit: With a bellhousing. Oh, and the shifter mechanism will probably necessitate some cutting.

Edited by irokin

A mate has a 5 speed jerico in an FG XR8 that he uses for weekend warrior duties.

The initial cost of the transmission was okay, the bellhousing, clutch, flywheel, thrust bearing, tailshaft, selector and startermotor was the cost killer.

The total conversion set him back more than what an older H6S would have, now planning to remove it and I've ordered a brand new RD6 for him.

The jeri was good to use but the cost of maintaining it has proven to be expensive when it requires parts, so the hollinger is a better option.

For sprints, where you are only allowed to pass on the straight, punch out of the corners is particularly important, you need to get past that slowbie you have been following ASAP and corner exit acceleration will do that for you. With my gearbox and diff an effective rev range of from 4000 to 7000 is required so it has to be well on boost and making good power at 4000 but not run out of puff past say 6000.

So it's not how much power is needed, it's what setup will give me a suitable and highest power spread possible. Makes the car nice to drive too which helps lap times as well.

There are large gains to be had in FBW throttle mapping getting rid of all waste throttle, ie only requesting 40% of plate opening if peak torque can be generated at this opening as this means a pedal reduction of 2% yeilds a reduction of horse power, increasing actual fly opening as rpm increases allways only requesting the min value to net max engine power at given rpm. Gear dependant boost pressure will also help and the holinger and quieff boxes have a voltage output making setting this function up very straight foward. cheers brad

Would a cheaper alternative be 4d boost mapping with TPS vs boost and a Speed vs Boost map?

Edited by Super_Dude

Would a cheaper alternative be 4d boost mapping with TPS vs boost and a Speed vs Boost map?

would be one way of doing it for sure, means running ignition cut for traction control though which is pretty hard on the engine if its on a percentage of cut for the majority of the lap. would be difficult to map due to constantly changing grip levels, maybe you could swing a 9 position trim of a gain compensation to vary it like we do to ulter the target slip percentage and rate in which throttle is slammed shut on slip break out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...