Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In my humble opinion if you tune your 3lt to make peak torque across the entire rpm range it will be a much more difficult car to drive, the sheer amount of torque that the three litre can develop at 3000/4800 rpm in an area where the boost is rapidly rising to target wastegate pressure will break the tyre contact patch, assuming your car is not FBW throttle then timing and boost are the only means of controling the power in the mid range. To tune to peak torque above this area and maintain peak torque for as long as possible is the key to tunning any engine.

Look to making modifications to the rear geometry as even the 33 has way to much anti squat in the rear to work with radial r tyre, which will make putting any more than 380rwkw to the ground through a radial challenging.

In my 32 it is a faster car with 490rwk even at a tight circuit like baskerville, as long as the power is controllable and follows throttle request (well as well as you could expect a turbo car to). There are large gains to be had in FBW throttle mapping getting rid of all waste throttle, ie only requesting 40% of plate opening if peak torque can be generated at this opening as this means a pedal reduction of 2% yeilds a reduction of horse power, increasing actual fly opening as rpm increases allways only requesting the min value to net max engine power at given rpm. Gear dependant boost pressure will also help and the holinger and quieff boxes have a voltage output making setting this function up very straight foward. cheers brad

hollinger, + setting up the fly by wire throttle + ECU to run it etc

true you wont do what youve stated above for 30k if your buying new parts and paying someone to do any part oif it , tunning, install etc. What else other than a quaffe/holinger can you poke 420rwkwrwk through without it turning inside out in a race car if the car setup to put it to the ground.

Jerico 4 or 5 speed road race box? Im surprised no one really runs these in Aus. I got rough figures of about $6500 for a 4 speed and ~$8000 for a 5 speed for an 800hp capable box when I looked into it. Edit: With a bellhousing. Oh, and the shifter mechanism will probably necessitate some cutting.

Edited by irokin

A mate has a 5 speed jerico in an FG XR8 that he uses for weekend warrior duties.

The initial cost of the transmission was okay, the bellhousing, clutch, flywheel, thrust bearing, tailshaft, selector and startermotor was the cost killer.

The total conversion set him back more than what an older H6S would have, now planning to remove it and I've ordered a brand new RD6 for him.

The jeri was good to use but the cost of maintaining it has proven to be expensive when it requires parts, so the hollinger is a better option.

For sprints, where you are only allowed to pass on the straight, punch out of the corners is particularly important, you need to get past that slowbie you have been following ASAP and corner exit acceleration will do that for you. With my gearbox and diff an effective rev range of from 4000 to 7000 is required so it has to be well on boost and making good power at 4000 but not run out of puff past say 6000.

So it's not how much power is needed, it's what setup will give me a suitable and highest power spread possible. Makes the car nice to drive too which helps lap times as well.

There are large gains to be had in FBW throttle mapping getting rid of all waste throttle, ie only requesting 40% of plate opening if peak torque can be generated at this opening as this means a pedal reduction of 2% yeilds a reduction of horse power, increasing actual fly opening as rpm increases allways only requesting the min value to net max engine power at given rpm. Gear dependant boost pressure will also help and the holinger and quieff boxes have a voltage output making setting this function up very straight foward. cheers brad

Would a cheaper alternative be 4d boost mapping with TPS vs boost and a Speed vs Boost map?

Edited by Super_Dude

Would a cheaper alternative be 4d boost mapping with TPS vs boost and a Speed vs Boost map?

would be one way of doing it for sure, means running ignition cut for traction control though which is pretty hard on the engine if its on a percentage of cut for the majority of the lap. would be difficult to map due to constantly changing grip levels, maybe you could swing a 9 position trim of a gain compensation to vary it like we do to ulter the target slip percentage and rate in which throttle is slammed shut on slip break out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...