Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Although id never recommend this you have this option that may just save the next set of turbo's you bolt to this engine that really in my opinion wont be long off throwing the shells out of it.

Run a brush through the turbo oil feed gallery to the main gallery on the filter side or get a piece of mig wire and see if you can feed it across. You could also remove the front oil plug under the water pump/above the oil pump and flush from the turbo feed back to the filter and out the front.

Edited by Supa Steve
  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

FWIW the viscosity is down to what you'd expect of a -30 oil (around 11). -40s are around 15 and -50s are around 19. Redline 15W-50 is 19.6 out of the bottle.

EDIT: i think the report is showing the expected range as 16.3 to 21.4, they just have the symbols around the wrong way.

And:

* Aluminum (Al): Thrust washers, bearings and pistons are made of this metal. High readings can be from piston skirt scuffing, excessive ring groove wear, broken thrust washers, etc.

* Boron, Magnesium, Calcium, Barium, Phosphorous, and Zinc: These metals are normally from the lubricating oil additive package. They involve detergents, dispersants, extreme-pressure additives, etc.

* Chromium (CR): Normally associated with piston rings. High levels can be caused by dirt coming through the air intake or broken rings.

* Copper (CU), Tin: These metals are normally from bearings or bushings and valve guides. Oil coolers also can contribute to copper readings along with some oil additives. In a new engine these results will normally be high during break-in, but will decline in a few hundred hours.

* Iron (Fe): This can come from many places in the engine such as liners, camshafts, crankshaft, valve train, timing gears, etc.

* Lead (Pb): Use of regular gasoline will cause very high test results. Also associated with bearing wear, but fuel source (leaded gasoline) and sampling contamination (use of galvanized containers for sampling) are critical in interpreting this metal.

* Silicon (Si): High readings generally indicate dirt or fine sand contamination from a leaking air intake system. This would act as an abrasive, causing excessive wear. Silicon is also used as a anti-foam agent in some oils.

* Sodium (Na): High readings of this metal normally are associated with a coolant leak, but can be from an oil additive package.

Hi Duncan ,I have mine done here in Perth pay $26, as i do 20,000 per oil change & GET BAGGED heap`s of this,

but again if your in DD & do good mile`s no need to,ANY WAY place that do Sample should INTERPRET ,

WESTTRAC & SHOULD BE AUSTRALIA WIDE.

Duncan if you look up my old post`s there in that ,

FUCHS SUPERSYN 5W-40 we had few bit`s put up,so hope that will be of some help,

i did post sheet up so all info on that should help you understand bit more about your`s

Cheer`s Chuckie.

I can understand bearing material wiping off in the 1st few hours of engine start.

Are you crazy? A properly built and clearanced engine ran on the correct viscosity oil should show no bearing material wiped from the surface. The 1st few hours of an engines life is critical as well as the fact crankshafts and rods do not turn on bearings, they turn on a film of oil. The bearing is used to provide the clearance for the oil.

Ive personally seen bearings from RB engines that have done 1000hp+ as well as 10,000klm of hell that could have been put back in the packet and sent back to ACL for a credit.

on the second to last line of comments it says:

"results are high for oil in-service time, but consistent with equipment run-in"

doesn't that say it all, the engine is 7 days old? you need to test again in so many km's to obtain a trend.

I've had my oil tested, on a new engine and whoever does the testing should be able to explain everything, don't think you can say its stuffed from one test.

Are you crazy? A properly built and clearanced engine ran on the correct viscosity oil should show no bearing material wiped from the surface. The 1st few hours of an engines life is critical as well as the fact crankshafts and rods do not turn on bearings, they turn on a film of oil. The bearing is used to provide the clearance for the oil.

Ive personally seen bearings from RB engines that have done 1000hp+ as well as 10,000klm of hell that could have been put back in the packet and sent back to ACL for a credit.

Thats nice, Ive also seen a 1200hp Aspirated small block throw a set of Oliver Billet rods out the side of a Dart block while just running the cam in.

So you are trying to tell me that even a well primed oil system will have perfect oil coverage on each and every bearing that is covered with assembly lube etc.

Hi Duncan ,I have mine done here in Perth pay $26, as i do 20,000 per oil change & GET BAGGED heap`s of this,

but again if your in DD & do good mile`s no need to,ANY WAY place that do Sample should INTERPRET ,

WESTTRAC & SHOULD BE AUSTRALIA WIDE.

Duncan if you look up my old post`s there in that ,

FUCHS SUPERSYN 5W-40 we had few bit`s put up,so hope that will be of some help,

i did post sheet up so all info on that should help you understand bit more about your`s

Cheer`s Chuckie.

You obviously use Wearcheck in Malaga too Chuckie. Thats who I use for my car and work too.

regards

Hi Chris no dude ,i have ME & 2 do my work ,

WELDING & SOME FAB WORK BRAD STACY,

MACHINE WORK TERRT STACY &

THERE OLD WORKSHOP ROTOMOTION.

OH & SAM @ NA CYLINDERHEAD`S,

But like to do what i can .

Cheer`s Chuckie.

on the second to last line of comments it says:

"results are high for oil in-service time, but consistent with equipment run-in"

doesn't that say it all, the engine is 7 days old? you need to test again in so many km's to obtain a trend.

I've had my oil tested, on a new engine and whoever does the testing should be able to explain everything, don't think you can say its stuffed from one test.

Well...the context is that it is only 7 days old....but they are race days. The motor has done about 1000klm and is on it's 4th oil change and 4th oil filter. Any initial wear should be long gone.

Anyway, I spoke to the lab today.

Basically their take on it is very high bearing levels is.....looks bad but motor is not necessarily dead....change the oil and check again after next race day.

most likely cause of bearing damage is oil not OK (as shown by viscosity being 50-70% of rated, ie around 30 instead of 50.)

most likely cause of oil breakdown, given the quality brand and number of inclusions showing it is a quality synthetic, is fuel in the oil.

i have done UOA before dunc. used to cost me around $40 they give you container and you send it off. never had much trouble interpreting the results as they were always good. doing the UOA was what convinced me to keep forking out the $$ for motul chrono oil. even after being really got (110C +) and having a trackday (sometimes 2) the oil was still excellent.

maybe think about a different oil? though if it is fuel contamination it won't solve your problem obviously. :(

fingers crossed the next test is brighter and it was just stuff from a new engine. :)

Basically their take on it is very high bearing levels is.....looks bad but motor is not necessarily dead....change the oil and check again after next race day.

most likely cause of bearing damage is oil not OK (as shown by viscosity being 50-70% of rated, ie around 30 instead of 50.)

most likely cause of oil breakdown, given the quality brand and number of inclusions showing it is a quality synthetic, is fuel in the oil.

What will you do to address the fuel issue? Will you use the Redline again?

Sorry didn't get time to call you Duncan. Seems like you got it under control though.

Keep in mind, everyone, that ester based oils CANNOT be used with alcohol fuels.

I have had a Motul rep in my shop telling me if we run E85 or Methanol that we are not allowed to run their oil as it will damage it.

Redline uses the same ester base stocks so I assume they would be the same.

Are you running E85 Duncan?

Hi Dan, no this is regular 98. Interesting reminder about E85 and oils though.

One question I still have for you.....do the bearing levels look high enough to assume the motor is dead/nearly so? ie should I pull it out and strip it to check?

I know its hard to guess on the interweb but just interested what you would do if you got that report.....

If I had an engine with those results after the 4th oil change, I'd be pulling it down. The results we get are different to those ones. obviously lead is the top babbit layer and copper is underneath. Tin is the back shell material. High levels of lead and copper are a bad sign. High levels of lead during run in are ok but if you get copper, that means you are wearing through the top layer of the bearing which shouldn't be happening.

I would definitely NOT be taking it to another track day. I would bit the bullet and just pull the engine. You can save a lot of dollars if you do it now rather than later once it has completely failed.

pulled the motor apart today, the the main bearings were f**ked although not spun yet, and the big ends were almost perfect (just some foreign damage, I guess as the mains died). Good call Dan

so 1 point to the oil analysis.

Does anyone have results for a motor just after run-in?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cheers, and cheers for sharing so much of the build and also sharing the glimpse of what turns out to bring a lot of us poor decision makers together haha.  I do recommend learning more about how to manage it, if not considering getting a  formal diagnosis.  The discussion with the psychiatrist I got my diagnosis through was quite eye opening, things I'd not even considered to be ADHD related and hadn't mentioned were things she asked about out of the blue and were common themes with people with my flavour of ADHD.   It's not a label for people who are hyperactive and ill-attentive, there's more to it than that and some of it can be much more challenging or damaging - though there are of course two sides to the thing, and a lot of the stuff we have to go through and work on to live with it make us effectively "better" at other things as well. Aside from the fact that there is some argument I could have a bit of ASD seasoning in there (came up during the diagnosis, and neurodiverse things seem to not stay as a cookie cut) I suspect you need to learn more about ADHD if you are puzzled about how hyperfocus could possibly apply.  I *do* personally use "superpower" with quotes deliberately, but it's 100% an ADHD thing due to the exact reason that lack of focus is also an ADHD thing... Loosely speaking the inattentive side of ADHD isn't the inability to focus, it's the inability to control where the focus goes.  Not being able to sleep because brain is more interested in thinking about a stupid thing I said to a girl I liked 30 years ago, not being able to focus on work because my brain is more keen on putting together the torque management strategy we're going to try out with a drag car next weekend, not being able to focus on a conversation with someone I WANT to listen to and respect because there is a flickering light in my peripheral vision.    If I could just stop work and build the torque management setup right there and then I'd not hear anything else until it was done.  
    • Maybe you should do some more reading.  Google positive effects of ADHD and you'll get your answers.  One of my personal downsides of ADHD has been talking before I think.   Maybe you have it too?
    • Excuse me for butting in....but which part of ADHD can be considered a superpower? I would have though it far more likely that some ASD comorbidity is more likely to be contributing to an ability to hyperfocus on something. ADHD being aimed somewhat in the other direction. My shed looks like your shed. My whiteboard list of unfinished projects has entries going back 15 years. I know what you're talking about - I just struggle to connect ADHD to the results being discussed.
    • Thanks for reaching out!  It's a blessing and a curse at the same time.  I'm undiagnosed but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see it in me... I have more half started projects laying around my house, shed, garden, etc taking up space and money, destroying aesthetics than if I added up all of my mates projects together. But, ADHD gives me the ability to hyper focus on things that no mere mortal could even  comprehend.  A recent pool build is an example of that....  I dont know anyone else that would be dumb enough and focused enough to take on then complete something of that magnitude. I call ADHD a superpower but it can equally be completely destructive if not controlled and focusedon the right places. Addiction is a major concern to ADHD people and thankfully my addictions have been no worse than projects, XBOX, chocolate and being an arsehole! It's often hereditary and my 13 year old son is currently learning how to drive it at the moment. Keep lurking! If i can finally finish this bloody thing at some point it will be a win for all of us ADHD'ers! 🤪
    • I've been quietly following this thread for ages, but this one got me. Since my ADHD diagnosis (and associated learnings and prescription) I'm way less inclined to wade into forum yarns when there are better things to do with my time, as half the time I'd end up in some kind of forum debate even if that wasn't my intention. I've not lost the ADHD "superpowers", just am a lot better at directing my hyperfocus into slightly more constructive things, but haven't stopped quietly lurking in here in my spare time.  
×
×
  • Create New...