Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you can find 3 local tuners who can tune, recommend and use it and can offer a reasonable price for install and tune go for it. there is no point picking an ECU that no one can tune, so best you check before anything.

my advice do like everyone else

powerfc

nistune

vipec

should be lots of local tuners, good options, good pricing as you can choose the tuner etc

fkn megasquirts is all ill say.

Ive added them to my no touch list as all the owner built ones seem to come in with a plethora of issues.....

^^

there are much better ecu"s out there, i had a mate try 1 in his datto w/CA18..........it was a nightmare to setup as he used a ford ignition w/crank pick up and there was no tech support as they are based in england (so you have to call them at crazy hours).

stick to what has been tried & tested - Vipec/Link, Power FC, Nistune. at least all these are plug & play ecu's. there are plenty of people out there that have a lot of experiance with them.

Megasquirt is a good ecu but you have to have someone that knows what he's doing to work on it. A friend of mine got one in his BMW that made 390+ rwhp and 390+ torque. Car is insane, but.... i wouldnt put it in my skyline, too much hassle to make it work on a RB motor.

for what it's worth any ECU can make power, any ECU can make 100rwkw, 200rwkw, 800rwkw, 1200rwkw

how the ECU is tuned, the car, the usage requirement, it's usability, how it installs, features, support when things go wrong, price and availability of tuners is what is the deciding factor when choosing an ECU

so forget how much power a guy can make using an ECU

megasquirt is a owner made ecu for tinkering around and just having a mess around, great if you want to add loads of custom features yourself or are making an old carby car ecu but if you are not doing it yourself all you are doing is making it impossible for the tuner for no gain, generally they aren't a very good ECU and I would say its a large downgrade over a nistune.

Nistune is what I'd recommend for a near stock car, cheap, looks standard, no new wiring, simple to tune and large amount of tuners available.

^^ exactly they are generally fine with owners who have a clue about wiring and electronic principles, in fact give good results on the cheap as the owner can get most parts (triggers sensors etc from wrecking yards)but the the problem is most people with no clue see the price then buy it. try install it... fail then drop it to a workshop to sort out.... which is a night mare for us as often it is cheaper and easy to rip the lot out stick a std loom back in nistune it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...