Jump to content
SAU Community

20 Inch Wheels On R33 (Work Meisters)


Recommended Posts

Hi guyyys and Grrrrls,

I had stupidly decided to purchase some new rims for my car which are Work Meister S1's:

20 * 9.5 + 25

20 * 8.5 + 25

Now the rear fit snug as a bug in a rug, just teasing their lip out of my lightly pumped guards.

Issues arise with the front however. The rolling diarmeter of the rim seems too large for an R33 to cope with.

The tire in the pics is a 245/40/20... so I am intending to run a 225/30/20 with some stretch to pull the rolling diameter back abit. That said, the 245's on the rim are worn to the belts and therefore I am skepcital of how a 225 will go with full tread, considering this worn out 245 still rubs.

Now, I was considering a 10mm spacer to pull the inside of the tire away from the control arm, AND a 225/30/20 with abit of stretch in the side wall to increase the gap. However, I'm not sure it will be enough.

Has anyone else run into these issues with stupid 20s? Suggestions? Does anyone know if aftermarket control arms are available (I had a quick look, but didnt see anything)

Pics of my problem....

img12001292455531.jpg

img12011292455531.jpg

img12031292455531.jpg

img12041292455531.jpg

img12071292455531.jpg

img11291292455531.jpg

img11971292455531.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm. It appears 225/30/20s only increase the rolling diameter by 11mm over the standard 225/50/R16 rolling diameter of the 33. If I add in some stretch and some spacer-age... and I think it might just fit.

Haha I know this will cop "dont put 20s on a 33"... but they came up so I snapped em up. Sort the fitment out at a later stage :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guyyys and Grrrrls,

I had stupidly decided to purchase some new rims for my car which are Work Meister S1's:

20 * 9.5 + 25

20 * 8.5 + 25

Now the rear fit snug as a bug in a rug, just teasing their lip out of my lightly pumped guards.

Issues arise with the front however. The rolling diarmeter of the rim seems too large for an R33 to cope with.

The tire in the pics is a 245/40/20... so I am intending to run a 225/30/20 with some stretch to pull the rolling diameter back abit. That said, the 245's on the rim are worn to the belts and therefore I am skepcital of how a 225 will go with full tread, considering this worn out 245 still rubs.

Now, I was considering a 10mm spacer to pull the inside of the tire away from the control arm, AND a 225/30/20 with abit of stretch in the side wall to increase the gap. However, I'm not sure it will be enough.

Has anyone else run into these issues with stupid 20s? Suggestions? Does anyone know if aftermarket control arms are available (I had a quick look, but didnt see anything)

Pics of my problem....

Judging by the pictures you posted and the overall diameter of your current tyres you shouldnt need bolt on spacers to make the front wheels fit.

Here are the approximate overall diameter's of the tyres you have and alternatives that could get you out of trouble (factoring in tread depth which is usually about 5-7mm depending on the tyre).

245/40R20 - approx O.D: 704 - 705mm

245/35R20 - approx O.D: 679 - 680mm = -24, -25mm (compared to 245/40)

225/35R20 - approx O.D: 665 - 666mm = -38, -39mm (compared to 245/40)

225/30R20 - approx O.D: 642 - 643mm = -61, -62mm (compared to 245/40)

One thing you will have to be aware of is that as a general rule the lower you go in sidewall, the lower the tyre's load rating and if the load rating isnt equal to or higher than the manufacturer's spec then you can be defected or if you have an accident your insurance can be void... So make sure you check the load ratings before fitting new tyres.

I hope this helps :)

P.S - Love the Work Meister S1's! :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing you will have to be aware of is that as a general rule the lower you go in sidewall, the lower the tyre's load rating and if the load rating isnt equal to or higher than the manufacturer's spec then you can be defected or if you have an accident your insurance can be void... So make sure you check the load ratings before fitting new tyres.

U can also get defected for having a total diameter over 15mm over stock so you pretty much can't win with 20's. I'd prefer to have the correct outer diameter than the correct load rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should've got 22's for your 33 :P

On a serious note though, grinding down the upper arm worked for me, had the car pretty low and it scraped on full lock. Another option is to just get yourself some adjustable coilovers and raise the front up by 10-20mm. Won't have a huge impact on the look of the car.

Spaces draw unwanted attention so I'd steer clear of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do have Teins in the car... so once I get the wheel clearing I will play with ride height to make em not scrub on the guards.

I am hesitant about griding the control arm. I know in reality its an easy fix but its abit of a last resort for me.

I will run 225/30 tires on the front, and I am hoping this will provide the clearance I require. Will keep you guys updated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i personally wouldnt touch the control arm. who knows how much that is going to affect the integrity of the arm + what if you get defected? would they knock you for that? could mean a new control arm...

thought i wouldnt be able to say this but it looks fkn sweet tho mate, tuff as nails

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks!

Haha yeh everyone hears 20s and thinks "GAY".

Thats ok i generally do to. But I must admit, these 20s I couldnt resist. There is something stupidly attractive about the proposition of black 20inch meisters on my car.

Im going for a new look, so the wing will be coming off and replaced with some carbon fibre touches here and there :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20s look stupid on the front of skylines the lack of tyre sidewall and the raised hieght is ridiculous..

Now if your were to pick up some 18s for the front,it will make your steering easier and better, it will make your your frontend lower giving the car a mean rake with the front being slightly lower than the rear and generally all your problems will be solved and your car will look tuff as balls..

Thats my 2c anyway ,if you wanna keep your stupid 20s on the front then i have no further advice..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
×
×
  • Create New...