Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys, I have been reading this thread alot actually as I went in Sam's 305rwkw 4dr 32 and these turbos are very similar to the td06 he ran.

The power with these is very impressive, while I still enjoy my Garrett, I cannot get outta my mind the td06 copy simply when I went for a drive with Sam.

Essentially it was like a light switch, all of a sudden this absolute enormous RUSH and in 4th we went sideways. He was laughing his ass off, as was I... while screaming.... the Garrett by comparison is extremely linear and pulls harder and harder, but sometimes I like that instant smack of boost.

I've spent too much on my setup now to change, but I assure you that td06 copy DID push 305rwkw

Make up your mind, you often chastise 56trim GT3076Rs for 52trim ones - they are barely different in size. If the compressor affects response that little, 52trim GT30Rs are redundant :)

That is all oversimplified anyway, the compressor has a lot of affect on how boost threshold is achieved - loosely speaking the exducer is responsible for accelerating the air, the inducer is responsible for drawing it in.

You can actually make a more "responsive" turbo by having a larger sized exducer (fine balance between extra mass and extra "throw" off the tips which is where extended tips come into play).

Same goes for Garrett GT series turbines, they are often physically smaller for the equivalent than Mitsi/Borg turbos but they use a less abrupt blade attack angle through the turbine, meaning they are more of a high speed turbo. Lighter, but don't necessarily respond as fast to low speed gases for the equivalent size... so give or take a bit a Garrett GT series turbine would be normally the equivalent in response and flow to a larger say Borg Warner one, for sake of arguement.

I could go on for fricken ages, but the gist of what I'm saying is don't assume that all things are comparable just by mm measurements of a pair of wheels on different turbos.

Obviously size and trim are only a part of the equation, I know, as there is the design involved aswell. Be it so simple why would new technology arrise? We have always had control over size and trim, its not like it takes 30 years to think of a new size and trim combo.

What I'm saying is, while I have bastardised and simplified the terms to a ridiculous extent, I realistically just wanted to put forward that I have lost faith in simply dropping compressor size to make up for a lack of response. I am more so looking towards matching the largest and most efficient compressor to turbine as possible. That being said I still like the 52t 3037 combo better than I do the 56 :P

I also would like to put forward that my hunt is not for the most PSI at the lowest RPM but actually the broadest powerband within usable RPM limits, irrespective of boost pressure acheived at any RPM.

I have never read many good things about the TD05-20G. Seems to be a bit of a mismatch in wheel sizes. The TD05-18G is the way to go it seems, the 20G is just too much compressor to be spun by the little TD05 wheel....also on a plain bearing turbo running a mismatch of wheel sizes means you end up with higher bearing loads as at rpm as the axial load increases...or so I read

But the TD06-18G could be a good thing. I have been told the TD06 wheel is a good thing and its the 20G compressor that makes the TD06-20G as laggy as it is. So a TD06-18G could be a good thing, good sized turbine so that you can get good boost and flow without too much back pressure and a light little 18G wheel that is good for 240-250rwkws. I think the problem is the shafts are different diameters

car is booked in for a tune next monday, finally ahha. Somthing i noticed is defferent between my T67 and simon/batteries, mine had a bullet type nut on the compressor, came like that from factory...

Well now I'm just jealous! haha

Is your turbo ID tag the same as mine, as in a Kinugawa tag with T67-25g as the model?

Good luck with the tune :)

how jealous? hahahaha. seriously, this is how it was when i got it.

post-18938-0-05211500-1305028487_thumb.jpg

and anyone in vic that might be attending the show n shine at carribean gardens on sunday the 22nd of may, i should be there with the car, i might be entering with another club just for the hell of it, not for trophies, just for somthing to do.

as for the tune... it will be interesting to see, especially auto with a powerFC, ive since been told that powerFC's werent made for autos.... makes me wonder if the ecu is a powerFC ive never looked lol, thats what i was told it had when i bought it. i know its not a stock ecu because i have a dyno sheet from the previous build from the previous owner, oh well might pull it out tomorrow and double check it.

the guy thats tuning it thinks we should easily make 300rwkw on 17psi without pushing the engine 2 hard. its being road tuned apparently.. i dont know much about the tuning side of things, just the mechanics of it all. then cross fingers with some slicks, + the auto, im hoping for a mid to low 11 as simon has done.

btw simon what oil are you running in your engine, i need to throw in some new stuff before the tune. im running Motul Turbolight 10w-40, but ive been told i should go up to a 10w-60. any thoughts?

cheers.

Edited by OMY31T

hmm Im not too sure about the consistency of Mr Kinuagawa.

My right angle oil line feed is different to both of yours.

Initially I received the wrong V band flange but I contacted him and I had a new one sent to my door inside a week.

He also had 2 different listings for the T67 on ebay with one being $50 cheaper, I messaged him about this and he said they were exactly the same...

nothing major but something to be aware of if you buy one.

Good luck with the tune OMY31T im interested to see your results with the stock plenum vs Simon's with the "freddy".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thing I'd be doing, is pulling it out, and just getting the tune cleaned up for now. Before that even happens, checking over everything, like vac hoses, fuel hoses, etc. No point dropping thousands on sensors if the moment you start it back up all the oil leaks out, or it has massive vacuum leaks etc.   But really, to know what to do, depends on what your use case is. Hard core track car? Throw most sensors available at it. Street car, I'd probably just run oil pressure, oil temps, water pressure, water temp, probably fuel pressure too. I don't know exactly what the Link can handle and do with those though. And if it's mainly just to cruise the streets, rather than mountain runs, you can probably skip most of the above if you've already got them in as gauges and warning lights.   PS, inb4 "sell it and buy a modern sportscar"
    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
×
×
  • Create New...