Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

nice plenum :P

that turbos not laggy at all, it has as much power at 3500 as any 3071/76 or 2835

..Brilliant result..

Got mine tuned today :)

t67dyno.jpg?t=1308909591

t67boost.jpg?t=1308909571

t67r.jpg?t=1307875616

333kw

More in it but settled here due to injectors near max and valve springs getting loose up top.

Gotta take it for a decent drive before i say too much about how it drives and if i will push for more. Sounds CRAZY!!!! on boost :)

t67-25g

6boost

tial 44mm

freedy plenum

z32 in cooler piping

power FC

profec B II

740cc highflowed stock injectors

bosch 044

3" exhaust

Adjustable EX cam gear

exceedy 5 puk clutch (gonna have to get a twin plate i think!!)

E85 (trent tested it at E65) springvale stuff

Very nice battery, you are going to love that! What's the difference between the yellow and red runs?

Interesting the difference in low end power and boost between mine and your graphs... Yours hits 15psi at 3500rpm on the dyno where mine hits it at 4100rpm (which accounts for a fair bit more bottom end power/torque on the graph as well) but mine hits it at about 3500rpm on the road in 4th gear, have you tested yours yet? I'm guessing the dynos are on a different load/ramp setting because our set ups are near enough to exactly the same :)

Also worth noting that mine made almost exactly the same power as the same boost level (tiny bit more due to mine revving harder but pretty much spot on). Now you just need more boost :) haha

PS. Do you remember what the cam gear got dialed in at?

Edited by SimonR32

Very nice battery, you are going to love that! What's the difference between the yellow and red runs?

Interesting the difference in low end power and boost between mine and your graphs... Yours hits 15psi at 3500rpm on the dyno where mine hits it at 4100rpm (which accounts for a fair bit more bottom end power/torque on the graph as well) but mine hits it at about 3500rpm on the road in 4th gear, have you tested yours yet? I'm guessing the dynos are on a different load/ramp setting because our set ups are near enough to exactly the same :)

PS. Do you remember what the cam gear got dialed in at?

I wasn't there for the tune so im not sure, but obviously the red one was an earlier run and trent mentioned that the valve issue only showed up after a few runs as you can see from the sheet..

Maybe trent will explain some of the magic when he gets a chance :)

Exhaust is hanging a little low and hitting chassis so i gotta fix that then ill do some testing!

Bet you were happy when you picked it up then! Would be great if Trent could comment on how it all went.

Once again, congrats... Awesome power and response, glad someone else bit the bullet and had a go :worship::)

Edited by SimonR32

Bet you were happy when you picked it up then! Would be great if Trent could comment on how it all went.

Once again, congrats... Awesome power and response, glad someone else bit the bullet and had a go :worship::)

Yeh alot of firsts for me and it went really smooth I was very surprised!

Built the thing on the cheap I already had the power FC and Profec B, cost me close to $3.5k including the tune.

First time i have done any pipe work too did it all with mild steel tube lobster back style and welded with an Oxy!!!

Edited by battery

Was a kent to pull the stock one off!!!

I did a fair bit of port matching with a dremel on it too... came up good, no leaks!

yeah it looked like a prick of a job , thats why i didn't bother..but good on you, got it up and running pretty quick..

surprised your using the stock TB, thought you would've gone bigger..

good results anyway, I would get one myself if it would low mount happily the power looks awesome on paper.....

The welding looks great, and very nice response from the turbo. :thumbsup:

Perhaps I will bump into you at Springvale or Blackburn road, I have never seen anyone else filling up but there must be quite a few of us now.

I would be interested to know what Ramp rate timing its. could be looking at some thing in to the 15 second ish and that won't make it responsive at all. I believe that was 2 runs based on 2 different ramp timings. But congruts on the No.s

nice results, i might have 2 get mine tuned on e85 next time, considering mines auto so i lose a bit, but im still about 80rwkw behind you in power, with almost the same setup on pump fuel, hmms interesting, it makes me wonder how much difference going to 4" all the way from the pod will make and putting my AFM in the piping which im in the process of doing. only thing i do notice which was a big dofference in mine to yours battery is the torque, from memory, i had alot more torque than that, but ioll wait until i get my dyno sheets off trent.

i might have 2 get mine tuned on e85 ... mines auto so i lose a bit ... still about 80rwkw behind ... almost the same setup on pump fuel, hmms interesting

It does appear to be a pretty effective setup overall, and the dyno results at least are great. Looking at the results of the money spent, this particular turbo, manifold, and wastegate combination obviously flow well enough to make the numbers. I do wonder about transient response, away from dyno or drag strip (not intended as a negative comment). Difficult to dismiss, and my interest is how it would compare with either GT3076 or the BW offering if you started with a $3.5K budget and put it together.

Given the widely reported improvements E85 brings, I would like to see how this setup performs on 98 pump fuel.

i had a gt3076 before i went to the t67-25g, differences in setup are:

gt3076 i had

stock low mount

internal gate

.63 rear housing

return flow FMIC.

with the T67:

new FMIC

bigger FMIC pipework(went from 2.25 to 2.5")

XSPOWER HPC Coated highmount

44mm ext gate

and the dump has been modded to suit highmount

on the exact same boost between both turbos(17psi) i saw a gain of nearly 30rwkw just from those changes, granted the difference in rear housing sizes which would make up for a fair bit of it.

turbo response is not bad at all, and thats even with my auto being lazy, im making boost by around 3600rpm. As for e85 vs pump, from what i remember, but dont quote me on this, when i was talking to trent about it, he said there could be up to a 50kw gain from E85 over bp98, which would push me to around the 300rwkw mark + a few more psi, and a few changes in my setup should see me around the 330rwkw mark which was my aim, atm im around 255-260rwkw on bp98.

when i go back for a tune, i might get it done on bp98, and then take it back again later on with the same setup on e85 and record the differences.

I would be interested to know what Ramp rate timing its. could be looking at some thing in to the 15 second ish and that won't make it responsive at all. I believe that was 2 runs based on 2 different ramp timings. But congruts on the No.s

the runs are way less that 15seconds, the red one from memory was with a mega retarded exhaust wheel, i was trying a few things and it just so happens the valve springs did not play up as much on that run. i only included it as a comparo to say it still has alot more in it.

On average we use a relatively short run rate 9-12 seconds.

Final position of the exhaust cam wheel was so close to zero it is irrelevant :P

Thanks for all the comments guys!

Went through a tank of E85 yesterday, mostly hills and it feels great in the twisty stuff was so keen to take it out again today but tyres are on the belts so better not!

As for response well its hard for me to judge as i don't have much experience with anything over 240kw. That and as soon as the gate opens you tend to forget about any downfalls of the setup haha

might have to take you for a spin Arthur could tempt you to slap on a highmount!

It does appear to be a pretty effective setup overall, and the dyno results at least are great. Looking at the results of the money spent, this particular turbo, manifold, and wastegate combination obviously flow well enough to make the numbers. I do wonder about transient response, away from dyno or drag strip (not intended as a negative comment). Difficult to dismiss, and my interest is how it would compare with either GT3076 or the BW offering if you started with a $3.5K budget and put it together.

Im a big fan of bang for buck setups and for between 3.5-4k i got

Tune

Turbo

Manifold

Gate

plenum

injectors

Z32

stack of 2.5",3" and 4" MS pipe

bosch 044

braided oil drain

Bunch of hose, nuts/bolts, joiners, heat shielding, clamps and gaskets

Pod filter

Ex cam gear

Ebay and the classifieds here were the weapons of choice!

I guess there's another 30-50kw left in it but would cost me at least another $1k for springs and some injectors to get there. Then you gotta take into account the extra component stress involved and i don't think its worth it.

with that said i don't think its fair to compare this setup with an IW garret or high flow low mount purely because of the legalities involved..

Edited by battery

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...