Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We had an Epic fail last week on the dyno with an Evo consistently running 169-176AWKW..... Changed plugs, checked for leaks...Checked everything...

Turned out is was simply bad E85... Replaced the tank of fuel and BAM 300+AWKW first run.... We laughed at the end of the day but were a bit annoyed that it was something easy...

Fingers crossed its just clutch slip or something easy man :thumbsup:

We had an Epic fail last week on the dyno with an Evo consistently running 169-176AWKW..... Changed plugs, checked for leaks...Checked everything...

Turned out is was simply bad E85... Replaced the tank of fuel and BAM 300+AWKW first run.... We laughed at the end of the day but were a bit annoyed that it was something easy...

Fingers crossed its just clutch slip or something easy man :thumbsup:

E85 Strikes again lol

So others are having similar issues? Or is it just a storage issue? I plan to go down that path very soon so just want to eliminate potential sh*tfights if possible....

sorry, 300rwkw and under only Simon.

good news: it holds boost and i get my car back

bad news: it makes less power on 19psi (220rwkw) then it does on 14.7 (245rwkw).

nothing was changed on inlet side (same as old setup and there was no issues), hot side has been changed and not running a cat to minimise restriction.

any ideas?

:/

Ouch, it didn't meet expectations I guess. Sorry to hear, if i remember correctly, did ARTZ make around 245rwkw on 14.5psi?? Same setup too isn't it.

fresh fuel before it was dropped off from my trusty local Shell Servo, never had an issue with petrol tbh lol

who knows what it could be, im gonna play around with it when i get back and will check for any damaged silicon hoses etc, i will send the map to Jez and see if he can spot anything unusual.

Ouch, it didn't meet expectations I guess. Sorry to hear, if i remember correctly, did ARTZ make around 245rwkw on 14.5psi?? Same setup too isn't it.

he made 267 rwkw

fresh fuel before it was dropped off from my trusty local Shell Servo, never had an issue with petrol tbh lol

who knows what it could be, im gonna play around with it when i get back and will check for any damaged silicon hoses etc, i will send the map to Jez and see if he can spot anything unusual.

he made 267 rwkw

How does it drive though? Strong n aggressive? Or not too snappy..

So others are having similar issues? Or is it just a storage issue? I plan to go down that path very soon so just want to eliminate potential sh*tfights if possible....

Its common for people to have E85 based issues, the fuel takes on water very quickly and is prone to it when stored. That goes for in the tanks at the servo too, remember that not many people run flex fuel cars so the fuel wouldnt sell super quick nor get restocked super quick either.

Remember also that Caltex eflex is a varying content fuel, meaning without a content sensor type ecu and appropriate tune you would want to be buying the CSR shit in barrels **No offense to people on the eflex bandwagon!!**.

My personal theory is to stay 98 till eflex goes mainstream, then i will get a content sensor ECU and go balls out.

picking it up tonight.

but judging from last time it had boost issues, 1 bar felt pretty slow (compared to my old setup with similar power)

Just as an FYI, ARTZ failed results are currently on par with hypergears FNT G3. The boost does come on 500rpm sooner, but it doesnt appear to be making any extra power at this stage (midrange). Hopefully a stout boost up once his clutch is fixed will change that, otherwise HG may have it in the bag (remember ARTZ and Stao use the same dyno/tuner).

who knows what it could be, im gonna play around with it when i get back and will check for any damaged silicon hoses etc, i will send the map to Jez and see if he can spot anything unusual.

I don't wanna jinx my own tune with my HG, but maybe this is some sort of karma for your stirs in the HG thread, when people had problems making the power that they expected ;)

Just as an FYI, ARTZ failed results are currently on par with hypergears FNT G3. The boost does come on 500rpm sooner, but it doesnt appear to be making any extra power at this stage (midrange). Hopefully a stout boost up once his clutch is fixed will change that, otherwise HG may have it in the bag (remember ARTZ and Stao use the same dyno/tuner).

I already know G3 can make more power than I will

I already know G3 can make more power than I will

At the moment (with your low boost and slipping clutch) its also matching you for response (sad panda).

Yet you will probably also nearly match it for power (IMHO), yet who knows... Maybe the new clutch and much more aggressive boost curve once fully tuned will yield more midrange :thumbsup: I'm pretty sure you will get close to 290kw with the thing, your most way there and still 5psi off target.

here is the dyno sheet;

2md546t.jpg

the line with red dots is the 1.4bar run, it gets good torque but then drops down and doesn't go any further than 180kph (6000rpm) at this time, its missing and running rich and there was black smoke everywhere.

appreciate any feedback on this.

cheers

On the high boost run the lines are all over the place presumably due to a misfire, whether its dodgy tune, dodgy coil, valve float or something different - who knows.

The build up of midrange looks good, I definitely wouldn't blame the turbo for the poor 1.4bar result... some issue needs to be resolved. Could end up pretty good once sorted :)

Other than that, more subtle bumpiness in dyno plots are often more to do with "smoothing" the dyno software does on the data it gets from hardware than how than the car is actually running. The data generated from the dyno is less than perfect, if it were plotted in its raw form it'd look more like a bunch of random dots with a general trend which might look a bit like it could be a curve.

The software has the unenviable job of finding a delicate balance of making it into a curve while keeping as much of the finer detail as possible but also keeping it "readable". Smooth it too much, and you could lose useful information - smooth it too little and it could end up just looking like a random lightning bolt. Also, the more you smooth it the lower the reading will be as it effectively draws the "highs" and "lows" closer together. While not a dyno example, this is the kind of thing that will be going on:

UserGuide117_html_3238a563.gif

Whats the ECU/Engine setup?

Out of interest, can somebody explain why some curves are all wavey and all over the place like that? Is it the resolution/scaling?

When they are big waves it is somewhere in the tune (be it TUNE itself or mechanical tune state of the motor ie faults)

When they are small sharp waves it is normally the dyno sheet resolution. Once you compress the sheet it looks smoother.

In Dori's case its anyones guess right now. Could be spark breakdown, bad CAS signal, bad fuel pressure, poor WG control or clutch slip. Right down the bottom of the list I would say potentially a shit tune, but that is like..... Last option.

Make sure you have constant fuel pressure, double check both your dampeners are still in place, make sure your CAS wiring is still good and double check your clutch isnt letting go. If all of those come back perfect I rekon you have a turbulence issue in the hot side. If only you could borrow ARTZ manifold and housing to test.

cheers for the response guys.

its a Rb25DET NEO

td06sl2-20g 10cm

44mm tial gate fitted to stock exhaust manifold

haltech PS1000 ecu running map sensor

walbro fuel pump (rewired for constant voltage)

600cc highflow injectors

3" dump/front, no cat, 3.5" HKS hipower

2.5" hybrid style FMIC

CPC custom plenum

3A racing pod filter with 3" metal intake

GTScott is right, could be so many factors right now :/

When you say -

it gets good torque but then drops down and doesn't go any further than 180kph (6000rpm) at this time, its missing and running rich and there was black smoke everywhere.

It makes it sound like a spark issue as if its blowing a lot of black smoke it sounds like it should have plenty of fuel? Do you run Splitfire coils or similar man?

44mm tial gate fitted to stock exhaust manifold

walbro fuel pump (rewired for constant voltage)

These are my 2 concerns.

When you installed the pump did you ensure you left the fuel dampener in place? AFAIK the rear dampener is in the tank, in line with the pump (but i could be wrong). Double check this asap.

Im also dubious of the gate off the manifold. Because it branches off at the splitter I'm worried that the flowpath is disrupted by turbulence/reverberation from the WG tube going from one side of the splitter and back to the other. I know people will bawk at me and say no way, but i say yes way definitely possible. Remember the manifold has a true split up to that point, with exhaust pulses mixing at the pinch point when you blow a hole in the splitter. In this case mixing in the WG tube which doesnt extend at all beyond the split.

Could even be the turbo! Or Artz' car has some sort of secret squirrel stuff done to it :rolleyes:

Neg. The turbo is a simple item, simple known working combo (unless it has shat itself which I doubt).

When you say -

it gets good torque but then drops down and doesn't go any further than 180kph (6000rpm) at this time, its missing and running rich and there was black smoke everywhere.

It makes it sound like a spark issue as if its blowing a lot of black smoke it sounds like it should have plenty of fuel? Do you run Splitfire coils or similar man?

it isn't starving of fuel or anything like that

running JJR coilpacks

it isn't an ignition related missfire.

These are my 2 concerns.

When you installed the pump did you ensure you left the fuel dampener in place? AFAIK the rear dampener is in the tank, in line with the pump (but i could be wrong). Double check this asap.

Im also dubious of the gate off the manifold. Because it branches off at the splitter I'm worried that the flowpath is disrupted by turbulence/reverberation from the WG tube going from one side of the splitter and back to the other. I know people will bawk at me and say no way, but i say yes way definitely possible. Remember the manifold has a true split up to that point, with exhaust pulses mixing at the pinch point when you blow a hole in the splitter. In this case mixing in the WG tube which doesnt extend at all beyond the split.

the walbro pump ran on my old setup and that ran 18psi without any issues.

BSA ran the same manifold setup on his and it held 17 or 19psi.

my tuner tested it on 1bar, 1.2 and 1.4. both the 1.2 & 1.4bar runs had the same issue and both made less power than the 1bar run. so it seems like anything more than 1bar, its not liking it.

Could even be the turbo! Or Artz' car has some sort of secret squirrel stuff done to it :rolleyes:

maybe i should've rip this out and go with a HG turbo? oh wait, ill have the same issue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
×
×
  • Create New...