Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Great work...do the before and after graphs use the same ramp rates etc as the power curve with the cams seems to do a bit of darting around at the start and plays catch up to the std cam curve. Not doubting the result, as the cams do seem to make comfortably more grunt, just trying to understand if the cams actually allow comfortably more grunt at 3,000 & 3,500rpm which seems real surprising

Wow T67 and 3076 are pretty mirrored power wise but the T67 makes more torque, very interesting. Is the T67 something you could use in a street car? Or to laggy? The TD06 be better? I had sold my self on a TD06 but thinking T67 now for more potential in the future.

Great work...do the before and after graphs use the same ramp rates etc as the power curve with the cams seems to do a bit of darting around at the start and plays catch up to the std cam curve. Not doubting the result, as the cams do seem to make comfortably more grunt, just trying to understand if the cams actually allow comfortably more grunt at 3,000 & 3,500rpm which seems real surprising

Same ramp rate. Probably different start RPM but if anything the standard cam curve should have an advantage. It's all fair and reasonable testing, we were all surprised how well it all worked.

Boost was on heaps earlier so there was a fair bit more boost between 3000-3500rpm which helps make the extra grunt.

Same ramp rate. Probably different start RPM but if anything the standard cam curve should have an advantage. It's all fair and reasonable testing, we were all surprised how well it all worked.

Boost was on heaps earlier so there was a fair bit more boost between 3000-3500rpm which helps make the extra grunt.

:thumbsup: Oh well, lets hope Tomei have done their homework with the Poncams on the Rb20. I am not expecting anything near your result as franly I will be amazed if the 20G can flow any more then the 306rwkws its currently flowing

Wow T67 and 3076 are pretty mirrored power wise but the T67 makes more torque, very interesting. Is the T67 something you could use in a street car? Or to laggy? The TD06 be better? I had sold my self on a TD06 but thinking T67 now for more potential in the future.

looks like the t67 would be just like the 3076 on the street , until about 3500rpm where the 67 walks away by 25~ hp :P . That sort of power in a little rwd 32 would be a handful at the best of times! 120klm/h in 5th gear would get interesting real quick!

Lol i don't intend to run a high comp motor much longer, so knowing 8cm works well on an SR means I'd rather chase the response

Status can feel free to comment now lol

Other options are 3071, 3040 and FP3073 in no particular order. FP is 2 grand worth, the others id aim to buy used under a grand or kando it

so whats goin on with the motor..?

Doing a quick rebuild on my DET. Luckily the person I sold it to determined it was to far for for his looking and brought it back.

Basic built etc. Haven't you seen FB?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
    • That worked out PERFECTLY! Thank you big time to JJ. He was able to swap me his stock diff. He drove all the way to me as well. Killer! Removal & install was pretty straightforward. The diff itself is HEAVY. So that’s a 2 man job.  Man does the car drive nice now! Couldn’t have worked out any better 👌
×
×
  • Create New...