Jump to content
SAU Community

Kando Dynamics Turbo


SimonR32

Recommended Posts

lol @ and a few skids.

Just get the intake pipe off and check for shaft play. if its anything to worry about it would be that, and it should be excessive to make any noise.

my guess is you have had a pipe shift and its just the sound of turbulence. that OR the turbo to manifold gasket, bolts coming loose.

when my rear studs were sabotaged years back the car sounded like a hektic gum leaf surge slot whistler and then suddenly the gasket let go and it became a diesel. was silent once i changed the turbo gasket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have an urgent question for you skyline enthusiats! :)

My car was tuned and running perfectly to suit the old T04E turbo, am i able to drive the car with the new kinugawaTD06 20G turbo without getting it tuned for a few weeks?

It starts and idles fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

should be fine if you drive steady , definately try stay off the boost though..

how much power was the to4e running??

I made much the same upgrade ,your gunna love the 20g :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The T04E was running 310HP at 1 bar, i checked the plugs and they don't show any signs of running lean on idle only.

I will be doing mainly highway driving for about 1 week until i can get it tuned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just keep it on vacuum and cruise conditions and it should be OK.

Don't let it start spooling up though, I've changed cams in a car of mine recently and thought it would be OK to putt around.. Never have I been so wrong. The knock was incredible, am worried ill be pulling the motor my brother just put in the car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw him get tagged with that, nice looking result - 68mm compressor in stock housing is interesting... wonder if they hybrid a TD compressor on there or something funky? No wildly different to a hairbrained conversation GTScott and I had at one point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, I meant to bring that up with you today Lith.

Seems to be a stage 3 with a 20G combo, and seems to be quite happy while it is.

I wonder if that fills the said void ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it seems no matter what boost we squeeze into the 20G 310rwkws is all she wrote. So the lil TD06-20G has served me well for 10 years in April this year But this week she gets retired.

Whats the verdict on teh billet TD06s getting around. Have any proven they can outflow a 25G yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I have a 73HTA-TD06L2, TD06H-25G and T67-25G all with 10cm housings. That is probably the order I will try them in as well. If the 73HTA is ncie and responsive and makes good power then will happily flog the other turbos off to try and fund some tyres and track days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...