Jump to content
SAU Community

Kando Dynamics Turbo


SimonR32

Recommended Posts

Note how the 20G falls over on top end. This is from our re-worked version: SL20.5 mentioned earlier. It is made to have the same down low torque as the 20G, while holding the power band up top. Running against Kando's TD06L2-20G on a standard RB25det motor, Same response, more power with much wider power band. Nothing is changed apart from the turbocharger. Price difference is within $100 to listed kando item.

power.jpg

Less then $100 difference, why would you buy the Kando :/

Do you do this or can you do this as a bolton for the RB26 running in twin form, like the Kando do with the TD06L2S-20g ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^ I would like to see this also.

In the absence of boost plots, the 20.5G looks to be a little lazier coming on, and then in the best useful torque zone (4000-7000) it flattens by comparison to the 20G up until 5500. And then it seems able to hold torque from 6500-7200 thereby producing the bigger power number.

The 20.5G unit looks more linear (which I like) up where it's doing its thing across 4000-7000, but you've got to be able to consistently use that last 750rpm to make it worthwhile. Debateable which spec would be quicker point-to-point or around a track for a given car setup and driver of average/good ability. That aside, there is value in supporting an Australian business. For the minor cost difference customer service history might influence the final choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does appear that the dyno graph differences are related to boost delivery, and the 20.5G making more boost over 5000rpm. Whether that's more strongly related to pumping capacity (surely the 20G is hitting its peak, if the numbers on the graphs are an indication?), or boost controller settings only the tuner will know for sure.

It's looking like a case of gain in top end at the cost of some spool and mid range. Would be interesting to drive the two back-to-back and see how they feel, rather than base it only on graphs.

The 20G can't be dismissed as obsolete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are making 290-310rwkws (dyno differences and all) out of a 20G compressor based turbo you are getting near/to the limit of what the poor lol thing can pump, lol surely. :)

The 20.5G seems to be a smidgen slower to build boost but hangs in nicer up top. Boost taper suggests the 20G is at its limit..the hp and torque drop off really confirm it. Why wouldnt you take the extra hp in the final 700rpm if its given to you for $100.

But i wonder if its a compressor thing or turbine. I have always felt that the L2 wheel is a bit rubbish. My TD06 always held on way better up top compared to the L2s despite all their hype. Perhaps the 65mm turbine gives a bit more torque and helps the compressor keep the boost up. Indeed those in the Evo world hi-flowing all the billet 68-82mm compressors on Evo and STI use the 65mm and 67mm turbines...not the lil 61mm L2 version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accessing/using the grunt is where I see priority. It could simply be a matter of driver preference and ability. Running them back to back on the road/track would make it clear which best suits, and proves whether the bigger number on a graph equates to a faster car.

I'm not against the 20.5G, and agree its looking like a case of rob Peter/ pay Paul with the response/flow equation. You'd fully expect that the 20G boost tapering at higher rpm indicates it's running out of puff, but it might be that the quicker spool and beefier hit of mid range torque would fire that Skyline off each corner easier/faster than the 20.5 which then has a job to chase it down and hope the straight is long enough to make a pass before the next corner.

The $100 price difference is not an issue in my mind. HG does have a lot of satisfied customers with positive comments about the service, which counts for a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what do you think roy.? The 20.5g be cool on a built and pon cammed rb25? It wouldnt make it to 330kw-350kw mark though on wmi/e85. What would it make on p98 ypu think for a tune that I can use to get the most/best fuel economy for long trips. A mate just thinks I should get a efr7670 as itll give made response and probably nearly hit 380-400kw but I have no Idea im currently stripping it and painting it in the few weeks so I want to get everything organized. Another mate said ge kando to make me up a gtx3073 in 52 trim on a smaller 1" runner mx performance top mount manifold for better spool up with a 44mm gate off the housing from scotty. Iv also got to choose a new ecu as ive sold the Vi-Pec v44 I had. Was one of the first ones. Adaptronic worth a try you think or just go a link vipec or haltech?

Edited by Joshbigt62r
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh if you have a reasonable budget to play with, I'd urge you to consider a BW. It's good to examine all reasonable options/combinations but I think there's better options than what's been discussed here.

Look closely at the Airwerks range S200SX 7670, running T4 split pulse. Combine that with the small runner manifold you've mentioned and you ought to achieve extremely good response and hit the 450-480rwhp mark. That particular turbo is quite price competitive with what's been discussed here, but likely to easily outperform both for overall response:flow. No dicking around with "special" builds, and durability proven.

It is evidently a reasonably well trodden path in the US, so perhaps worth a bit of wider searching, and enquiry through Full Race. They are also quite responsive to customers.

Your biggest associated cost would be plumbing it all up with twin gates etc if you want to get the very best from it. The pictures of GTRJoey's 8375 install tells a story, but his results bear witness to the return on effort/expense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SR22 with 7064 on 98 vs my RB20 with 20G on E85 made DOUBLE the power i had at 4,000rpm. We made the same peak power. So on a 25 it would be uber on 98 with WMI and expect it would knock on 330 and leave any Mitsu based turbo in its dust. The SR22 was running under 20psi too so there is some headspace....EFR all the way if you can

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any dyno sheet of that SR22 ?

I need some data to finish convincing a mate with a SR to go EFR and he's thinking in going darton sleeves, 90mm bore if he ever needs to.

It currently has a china 2871 which won't last long @26psi on his still 2L SR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A pair of EFR6758s as boltons would be very nice :yes:

They are a very interesting looking turbo... I would love to run a pair!

Only issue I can see is they look long, and wouldn't fit. And definitely not bolt on. You'd need some pretty wild mods down there to fit them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love bolt on borg warner twins for my GTR to replace my HKS 2530s. Anyone know if this could be possible?

Do you think the front and rear housings would be usable?

AB1D3231-698F-4E76-9FD9-C49917044AE3_zps

C91700BF-E978-462A-B5F2-BD1063C7357B_zps

Two chances of making them fit in factory location.

What you can use is your current front pipe. They bolt up when using the Full Race dumps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

does anyone here have dyno graphs of the kando td05 18g and td05 16g on an rb20? ive been searching through and getting mixed results but not too many graphs, i'm considering getting one of these turbo's and would like to compare spool times mainly so boost/rpm/power graphs are much preffered, thanks :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The two diagrams are equivalent. The R32 one is just one sheet out of about 3 showing everything in the whole car all at once. And without knowing the functionality that occurs in the modules, they are both equally opaque.
    • 8v - 2.48ms 9v - 2.15ms 10v - 1.74ms 11v - 1.41ms 12v - 1.15ms 13v - 0.99ms 14v - 0.89ms 15v - 0.82ms 16v - 0.81ms I'm running these values on my RB20 Neo with 570cc Denso R35 stock jets and it's great. Also bought a set for my Legnum VR4, love these injectors!
    • Thanks for your reply,  Those blue/green wires running to the actuator aren't attached to anything, so I'm not sure how the central locking is still working. I will have to take a good look tomorrow, I don't have the car with me. After googling it seems like a pretty common aftermarket actuator which even uses the same green/blue wires the immobiliser required. i'll test everything tomorrow and if it's working i'll melt the solder, strip it, resolder and neaten it all up with some heat shrink. I don't have to understand it if it works hahaha I just don't want a fire/ short circuit. That R32 diagram looks more like a continuity chart? Can you make sense of this form the R34 manual? 10V is probably due to very flat battery, i'll recheck as well tomorrow, I did have to jump start it haha. Thanks again!  
    • So, COM doesn't mean comms. It means common. What common itself means will depend on the type of device. For a two directional actuator (ie, one that can push and pull on the same output rod) then the common will typically just be the earth connection. There will be at least 2 other wires. If you put 12V on one of the other wires, then the actuator will push. On the other 12V wire, it will pull. Can't quite make out what is going on with the wiring of your actuator. It appears to have several wires at the actuator plug, but there only appears to be 2 wires where its loom approaches the door control module, with at least one of the others cut off. I don't know these actuators off by heart. I'd have to look at a wiring diagram for one before knowing what the wires were about, and that's despite me having to replace one in my car not all that long ago. Just not interesting enough to have dedicated memory set aside for trivia like that any more. That actuator is an aftermarket one, not the original one, which probably died and was replaced. That might require some sort of bodge job on wiring to make it work. Although nothing should justify the bodginess of the bodge job done. As to the soldering job on the door module's loom plug. Ahhahhahaha. Yes, very nasty. Again, I cant tell you what any of those wires do. You'd need to study the R34 wiring diagram (if you can find one that shows the door module). I don't think I have any. I'd have to study the R32 diagram to start to understand what mine is doing, and again, even though I've had a problem with mine for the last 25 years (where it locks the passenger door when the driver's window reaches top or bottom of travel) I'm just not interested enough to try to to work it out. So long as it's not burning down, it's fine with me. Here's the R32 GTR diagram, which, confusingly, has rear door lock actuators and window motors on it!! As you can see, unless you understand the functions of the door lock timer and the power window amplifier, you'll never be able to work out how it works just from the diagram. I don't imagine that the R34 one is any better. Hopefully an R34 aware bod can help. FWIW, the two wires that are cut and joined look like they are both power supply - so hopefully it is not fatal to join them. The 10V you measured on the cut off free end of one of them is concerning. You'd expect 12V, and it might be the reason for the bodge job joining them together.
×
×
  • Create New...