Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

simon the top half was removed when i drilled it pinch.gif. had the manifold welded before you post regarding the splitter and how it would completely disrupt the flow and end up being worse of. the damage was done so i thought id throw it on any way. on the standard turbo it was fine, but not too sure how it would be pushing 20psi. It will probably crack any way as the boys were saying, ill just get the gate welded to rear housing worse comes to worst

Or weld to the turbine housing, much easier and cheaper to fix if something fails. :thumbsup:

Its a pity the new ebay stainless T3 GT30 rears dont bolt up to the Kando's, that way the bend and flange are all similar metals to the housing. Perhaps its worth machining one out a few mm?

im keen on finding out about a t67 on rb25det with 98 pump fuel as here in wait awhile we dont have e85 yet. and i really cannot be bothered ordering and running the risk of running out of fuel somewhere unless simon has a better idea on how to get around this little problem haha

Mate STATUS has posted a few results of people running the T67 on 98...

There was even a guy who posted his results through an auto and low boost, it still make like 270kw....

STATUS has posted results of people on 98 doing about 330kw, should be good for the same on others Id say.

Mate STATUS has posted a few results of people running the T67 on 98...

There was even a guy who posted his results through an auto and low boost, it still make like 270kw....

STATUS has posted results of people on 98 doing about 330kw, should be good for the same on others Id say.

Thanks Scott, clearly i've missed those in my reading. I'll re-attack the posts. :thumbsup:

Just a quick question, ive got my bday coming up soon and my bro' s and sisters asked me what i wanted. I said a turbo lol. There willing to all chuck in some money towards a kando TD06H - 18G internal gate with a 0.5 bar actuator. So do u think this turbo would suit a 4cyl 1.8L engine ?

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Cover-T3-8cm-V-Band-Housing-TD06H-20G-/290664105318?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43acee4566#ht_2744wt_1396

This one states a 20G wheel but they should be able to change it for an 18G for the same price. What do yous think ?

Are you taking the piss or being serious? :thumbsup: I dont care but you could be right. Perhaps the smaller exhaust pulses of the pissy little 2L six means things are a little more sensitive to exhaust flow and back pressure

I was joking lol

Mate STATUS has posted a few results of people running the T67 on 98...

There was even a guy who posted his results through an auto and low boost, it still make like 270kw....

STATUS has posted results of people on 98 doing about 330kw, should be good for the same on others Id say.

cheers gtscott i missed it also ill have to wait for e85 over here in wait awhile (wa)

Just a quick question, ive got my bday coming up soon and my bro' s and sisters asked me what i wanted. I said a turbo lol. There willing to all chuck in some money towards a kando TD06H - 18G internal gate with a 0.5 bar actuator. So do u think this turbo would suit a 4cyl 1.8L engine ?

http://www.ebay.com....#ht_2744wt_1396

This one states a 20G wheel but they should be able to change it for an 18G for the same price. What do yous think ?

Was that a typo mate? TD06H-18g is overkill.

Had you meant TD05H-18g in an internal gate form with T25 SR20 style housing, then go for it :thumbsup: ive done one of those myself and it was a really nice turbo.

And to the others, no worries. I more or less check this thread daily so I have a fairly good recollection of what weve discussed or what has come up over the time. Its just about my favourite thread lol.

Was that a typo mate? TD06H-18g is overkill.

Had you meant TD05H-18g in an internal gate form with T25 SR20 style housing, then go for it :thumbsup: ive done one of those myself and it was a really nice turbo.

I had my doubts that a TD06 would have been a lil big. Thats why i wanted a 2nd opinion, so u think the below option would be better. It will be on a T3 flange manifold not a T25

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-TD05H-18G-w-T3-8cm-V-Band-Internal-Gated-Housing-/270918417854?_trksid=p3286.m7&_trkparms=algo%3DLVI%26itu%3DUCI%26otn%3D4%26po%3DLVI%26ps%3D63%26clkid%3D6453559929143493497#ht_2730wt_1396

I dont have ebay access at work so Ill need to update this from home.

What motor is it? Is there a reason you are limited to a T3 flange? The T3 IWG housings are highly undesirable.

Whilst the gate looks great mounted there im worried it will crack eventually. Isnt that the weak point where the manifolds crack without cutting a 2 inch hole?

I think you are well on your way to the 300 club. :thumbsup:

maybe even mid 300's now its on wild the sphincter of the universe

lol

i wrote wild t u r k ey and i get sphincter of the universe wtf?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...