Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Great work...do the before and after graphs use the same ramp rates etc as the power curve with the cams seems to do a bit of darting around at the start and plays catch up to the std cam curve. Not doubting the result, as the cams do seem to make comfortably more grunt, just trying to understand if the cams actually allow comfortably more grunt at 3,000 & 3,500rpm which seems real surprising

Wow T67 and 3076 are pretty mirrored power wise but the T67 makes more torque, very interesting. Is the T67 something you could use in a street car? Or to laggy? The TD06 be better? I had sold my self on a TD06 but thinking T67 now for more potential in the future.

Great work...do the before and after graphs use the same ramp rates etc as the power curve with the cams seems to do a bit of darting around at the start and plays catch up to the std cam curve. Not doubting the result, as the cams do seem to make comfortably more grunt, just trying to understand if the cams actually allow comfortably more grunt at 3,000 & 3,500rpm which seems real surprising

Same ramp rate. Probably different start RPM but if anything the standard cam curve should have an advantage. It's all fair and reasonable testing, we were all surprised how well it all worked.

Boost was on heaps earlier so there was a fair bit more boost between 3000-3500rpm which helps make the extra grunt.

Same ramp rate. Probably different start RPM but if anything the standard cam curve should have an advantage. It's all fair and reasonable testing, we were all surprised how well it all worked.

Boost was on heaps earlier so there was a fair bit more boost between 3000-3500rpm which helps make the extra grunt.

:thumbsup: Oh well, lets hope Tomei have done their homework with the Poncams on the Rb20. I am not expecting anything near your result as franly I will be amazed if the 20G can flow any more then the 306rwkws its currently flowing

Wow T67 and 3076 are pretty mirrored power wise but the T67 makes more torque, very interesting. Is the T67 something you could use in a street car? Or to laggy? The TD06 be better? I had sold my self on a TD06 but thinking T67 now for more potential in the future.

looks like the t67 would be just like the 3076 on the street , until about 3500rpm where the 67 walks away by 25~ hp :P . That sort of power in a little rwd 32 would be a handful at the best of times! 120klm/h in 5th gear would get interesting real quick!

Lol i don't intend to run a high comp motor much longer, so knowing 8cm works well on an SR means I'd rather chase the response

Status can feel free to comment now lol

Other options are 3071, 3040 and FP3073 in no particular order. FP is 2 grand worth, the others id aim to buy used under a grand or kando it

so whats goin on with the motor..?

Doing a quick rebuild on my DET. Luckily the person I sold it to determined it was to far for for his looking and brought it back.

Basic built etc. Haven't you seen FB?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Keeping in mind that I am currently getting flat 10 L/100km on my RB25DET, which means >>500km/tank. I would test this car for vacuum leaks, check codes and AFM signal with NissDataScan as D says, check plugs, do a compression check while they are out.
    • It is hard to be specific half way across the world...but it *seems* like it might have a minor issue. Is the idle stable and does it rev smoothly? I would not expect any pops out of what I am assuming is a standard ECU, standard tune, standard exhaust. You can use Nissan Data Scan to find out exactly what is happening when it runs, the cable/software is reasonably affordable if you are not planning on changing the ECU (which hopefully you are not with an NA skyline) BTW your mileage may not be that far off, these are heavy old tech cars, and being NA might mean you use a heavy foot to keep up with traffic....
    • Hey guys! Y'all are the masters so figured I'd check in on a few items here. - My engine sounds ever-so-slightly more raspy than the other NA RB25s I've listened to. It's barely noticeable but definitely a slightly different sound. - When I back off the throttle at high RPM, I will sometimes get a pop out of the exhaust, assuming this can be diagnosed as misfire. Some history on the car: - Had an exhaust leak in auction sheet but was claimed to be fixed by seller (bought from USA importer).  - Car's coil packs and sparks were replaced when it was sold to me, but unsure on what the gap is and whether the coil packs are correct.  - A prior mechanic had misdiagnosed a pilot or throwout bearing sound as LSPI/detonation. Had played with timing a bit, pops/raspy sound of engine just got worse. Got timing reset. - Had failed emissions a few times. First time went in as is, failed. Second time, replaced cat, still failed, running rich as hell. Third time replaced o2 sensor, passed. Car still smells gassy though. - Timing belt and valve cover gasket also replaced.  - Gas mileage is... low. about 350-400K per tank.  Any idea if I'm having any serious issues here or does this all sound like normal old NA RB stuff and I'm fine to drive it with the pops/slightly raspy engine? If it'll help, I can get drop a video of the sound of the engine.
    • So....to find any R chassis part number, get your VIN (will be something like ER33-xxxxxx for you) and go to: https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/nissan and enter it. From there you have access to a web version of Nissan's part system, FAST. It is a bit tricky to get used to, so maybe have a shot and post up what you think.  You can also search by general model but note in some cases your car might have different options so VIN is safest.  On diagram 211 I got 14075-75T16 for Connector, Water Hose If I search for part 14053‑21U10 that you posted, that is also a water hose but not the one bolted to the plenum and 14075‑04U00 is the fitting where the water hose goes into the block.
    • Yeah now we are talking I much prefer coolers in the front middle because it lessens the chance of a small bump to a corner stopping the whole event. I was thinking the AT cooler can move out of the radiator, delete the AT/engine coolant interwarmer and mount a separate cooler with a thermoswitch somewhere further back as is common in racing, that would be one thing. Beyond that, the engine oil cooler is an obvious one to move to the wheel arch, potentially one on each side, but unused space is an issue. I did have a earlier pic with the bumper off but it doesn't show how busy the corners are: DS is full of the auto driving sensors and PS is totally fully of windscreen washer fluid reservoir But ultimately I was hoping to keep the AC, and the water/air heat exchanger is fundamental so it is not just the radiator that needs to be in front BTW here's airflow to the rad as it ran at the track (one horn is gone now and I'll remove the lights next time):
×
×
  • Create New...